The Freedom to Display the American Flag Act and HOAs
Section 1: Overview — The Flag Act and community associations
The Freedom to Display the American Flag Act overrides any community association policy that would prevent a member from displaying the flag of the United States on residential property the member owns or has a right to use exclusively.1 The statute is the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-243, 120 Stat. 572. President George W. Bush signed it on July 24, 2006, and it appears as a note to 4 U.S.C. § 5.2 The "of 2005" in the title reflects the Congress in which the bill was introduced, not the year it became law.3
The Act reaches three entity types: condominium associations, cooperative associations, and residential real estate management associations.4 It preserves an association's authority to impose reasonable restrictions on the time, place, or manner of display that are necessary to protect a substantial interest of the association.5 It does not reach flagpole installation, flags other than the U.S. flag, or common areas in which a member holds no exclusive possession or use right.6 Separately, the U.S. Flag Code supplies etiquette for display rather than obligations enforceable against owners or associations.7 The sections below set out the statutory framework, the operational limits on associations, recent activity, and the interaction with state law.
Section 2: The statutory framework
2A. The Act: enactment, codification, and the operative prohibition
Congress enacted the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005 as Public Law 109-243, printed at 120 Stat. 572.1 It began as H.R. 42 in the 109th Congress. Representative Roscoe Bartlett introduced it on January 4, 2005; the House passed it on June 27, 2006; the Senate passed it on July 17, 2006; and President George W. Bush signed it on July 24, 2006.3 The title carries the year of introduction, which is why a statute titled "of 2005" bears a 2006 enactment date.3
Congress did not place the Act in the running text of the United States Code. Each of its sections carries the designation "4 USC 5 note," meaning the Act appears as a statutory note under 4 U.S.C. § 5 rather than as a numbered Code section.2 A researcher who searches for a section number will not find one; the Act sits in the notes to Section 5, and lawyers cite it to the public law and the Statutes at Large.2
The Act defines its covered entities by reference to other federal law. "Condominium association" and "cooperative association" take their meaning from section 604 of Public Law 96-399 (15 U.S.C. 3603), and "residential real estate management association" takes its meaning from section 528 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 528).4
Section 3 states the operative rule word for word: "A condominium association, cooperative association, or residential real estate management association may not adopt or enforce any policy, or enter into any agreement, that would restrict or prevent a member of the association from displaying the flag of the United States on residential property within the association with respect to which such member has a separate ownership interest or a right to exclusive possession or use."8
Two features control the Act's reach. The prohibition runs against both adopting new restrictions and enforcing existing ones. And the protection attaches only to property in which the member has a separate ownership interest or a right to exclusive possession or use.8 In a condominium, that includes the unit itself and a limited common element, such as a balcony or patio, that the declaration assigns to the unit for exclusive use.9 It excludes general common areas open to all owners.9 Within its scope, the Act preempts a contrary covenant, rule, or architectural guideline, which no association may adopt or enforce to the extent it conflicts.8
2B. The reasonable-restriction savings clause
Section 4 preserves association authority. It provides that nothing in the Act permits any display or use inconsistent with "any reasonable restriction pertaining to the time, place, or manner of displaying the flag of the United States necessary to protect a substantial interest of the condominium association, cooperative association, or residential real estate management association."5 The clause imposes two conditions on a restriction: it must pertain to time, place, or manner, and it must be necessary to protect a substantial interest of the association.5
This clause carries the practical weight of the statute. The Act removes an association's power to decide whether a member may display the U.S. flag on qualifying property, while leaving the association its authority over how and where the flag is displayed.8 The Act supplies no definition of "reasonable" or "substantial interest," so the content of the standard comes from the statutory text itself, since no reported federal decision has construed the substantial-interest standard under the Act.10 The statutory structure marks the line where a rule stops regulating time, place, or manner and instead prevents display, which is what Section 3 forbids. A restriction that permits display in name while eliminating it in practice sits on the far side of that line, though no court construing the Act has settled the point.8
2C. What the Act does not reach
The Act addresses display of the flag, not the installation of a permanent structure, so by its terms it guarantees no member the right to erect a flagpole.8 Flagpole rights, where they exist, come from state statutes. Texas, for example, bars a property owners' association from prohibiting the display of the U.S. flag and separately protects a homeowner's right to install a flagpole, subject to enumerated conditions.11 Florida bars an association from preventing display of a U.S. flag and, per Fla. Stat. § 720.304(2)(b), grants a homeowner the right to "erect a freestanding flagpole no more than 20 feet high on any portion of the homeowner's real property … if the flagpole does not obstruct sightlines at intersections and is not erected within or upon an easement," from which one U.S. flag "not larger than 4 1/2 feet by 6 feet" may be flown.12 The state Flag Display columns in the state matrix map these provisions jurisdiction by jurisdiction.
The Act protects the flag of the United States and no other. State flags, military service flags, POW/MIA flags, foreign flags, and political or decorative flags all fall outside it.8 Several states reach some of these categories by statute. Florida, for instance, permits under Fla. Stat. § 720.304(2)(a) "one portable, removable United States flag or official flag of the State of Florida … and one portable, removable official flag … not larger than 4 1/2 feet by 6 feet, which represents the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard, or a POW-MIA flag, regardless of any covenants."12 Texas protects the state flag and military service flags.11
Common areas in which a member holds no exclusive possession or use right remain subject to association control, because the Section 3 protection attaches only to property in which the member has a separate ownership interest or a right to exclusive possession or use.8 The Act does not address flag size, illumination, mounting method, or quantity directly; those are questions for the savings clause or for state law.5
Finally, the U.S. Flag Code, codified at 4 U.S.C. §§ 5-10, supplies etiquette rather than enforceable obligations. The Congressional Research Service states in Report RL30243: "the Flag Code does not prescribe any penalties for non-compliance nor does it include enforcement provisions; rather the Code functions simply as a guide to be voluntarily followed by civilians and civilian groups."7 Associations sometimes cite the Flag Code to members as if it bound them, but per CRS Report R45945 (Frequently Asked Questions About Flag Law): "Most of the flag code contains no explicit enforcement mechanisms, and relevant case law would suggest that provisions without enforcement mechanisms are declaratory and advisory only."13
Section 3: What associations can and cannot do about U.S. flag display
A. Covenants, rules, and architectural guidelines
An association may not enforce a covenant, rule, or architectural guideline that would restrict or prevent display of the U.S. flag on qualifying property, and it may not adopt a new one.8 A conflicting provision may remain in a recorded declaration, but it has no effect to the extent it conflicts with the Act, because the Act bars both adoption and enforcement.8 An architectural approval requirement applied so as to prevent qualifying display runs into the same prohibition.8
B. Time, place, and manner restrictions in practice
An association retains authority to impose reasonable restrictions on the time, place, or manner of display where necessary to protect a substantial interest.5 The clause contemplates restrictions directed at how and where a member displays a flag rather than whether the member may display it at all.5 The statutory text conditions any such restriction on a substantial interest, so the interest an association asserts, and its documentation of that interest, sits at the center of whether the restriction fits within the clause.5
C. What remains under association control
Flagpoles as permanent structures fall outside the Act; whether a member may install one is a state-law question that the state Flag Display columns address.8 Non-U.S. flags fall outside the Act; state statutes govern which additional flags an association must permit, and the state matrix maps them.12 Common areas without an exclusive-use right remain subject to association control.8 Architectural review continues to apply to structures and to non-flag questions, with state statutes supplying the limits set out in the state Flag Display columns.11
D. Enforcement, remedies, and dispute practice
The Act contains no enforcement mechanism, and on the reported federal authority it creates no private right of action. In Murphree v. Tides Condominium at Sweetwater by Del Webb Master Homeowners' Ass'n, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the Act "does not provide any enforcement mechanism, or explicitly create a private right of action for individuals such as Murphree to bring a lawsuit against a condominium association."10 A separate federal district court reached the same conclusion in Costanza v. Tchefuncte Harbour Ass'n, Inc., 31 F. Supp. 3d 849 (E.D. La. 2014), noting the absence of any express private right of action, enforcement mechanism, remedy, or penalty in the text.14 Because the Act itself supplies no remedy, parties generally litigate U.S. flag display disputes in associations under state statutes that do provide a cause of action, and any claim to damages or attorney fees must rest on that state law rather than on the federal Act.12
Section 4: Recent litigation and legislative activity
A. Recent decisions
No court decision issued in the past 36 months construes or applies the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act against a community association. A review of federal and state court sources, government databases, and current legal commentary, as verified on July 28, 2026, turned up no such decision; the controlling federal authority on the Act remains the two 2014 district-court decisions discussed in Section 3.10 One recent appellate decision on flag display in a residential setting arose under a different statute, and it appears here to mark the boundary.
Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC
The Seventh Circuit affirmed dismissal of a tenant's Fair Housing Act claim after a landlord invoked a "neutrality" policy to require removal of a Palestinian flag; the court held the tenant had not plausibly alleged national-origin discrimination.[15] The decision construes the Fair Housing Act, not the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act, and it concerns a flag the Act does not cover.[15]
| Property managers | A facially neutral display policy can still draw a fair-housing claim if you enforce it selectively, so document your enforcement and keep it consistent. |
| HOA board members | Farhan involves a non-U.S. flag under fair-housing law and does not change the federal U.S. flag rule, which continues to run through the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act and state statutes. |
| Community association attorneys | The case turns on how the plaintiff framed the claim, viewpoint versus national origin, and it confirms that disputes over non-U.S. flags sound in other bodies of law, not the Act. |
| Homeowners | Protection for a U.S. flag comes from the Act and state statutes; protection for other flags depends on state law or, in narrow circumstances, anti-discrimination law. |
B. Federal legislative activity
No bill amending the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act, extending it to flagpoles, or extending display protection to military service flags or other categories appears in the current or immediately preceding Congress. Recent federal flag legislation has addressed a separate subject: the All-American Flag Act, Pub. L. 118-74, 138 Stat. 1505, which President Joe Biden signed on July 30, 2024, and which originated as S. 1973, sponsored by Sen. Sherrod Brown. It requires that U.S. flags procured by the federal government be domestically made, and it does not touch association display rights.16
C. State legislative pattern
State legislatures continue to legislate in the area the federal Act leaves open. Florida amended its flag statute to expand the categories of protected flags to include, among others, a first responder flag, alongside its existing protection for the U.S. flag, the state flag, military service flags, and a POW/MIA flag.12 Disputes also continue at the community level. The Ambiance Homeowners Association, which manages 112 townhomes in San Marcos, California, adopted a 2024 policy banning residential flag displays and, per inewsource (June 29, 2026, reporter Katie Futterman), threatened residents Amy Cooke and Terri Collins with a $100 fine. The parties litigated that dispute against California's own flag statute rather than the federal Act; HOA attorney Michael Kushner said the association was "barking up the wrong tree" and that "the law is crystal clear."17 The state Flag Display columns track these developments jurisdiction by jurisdiction.
Section 5: Interaction with state law and related coverage
The Freedom to Display the American Flag Act sets a federal floor, not a ceiling. It guarantees a member the right to display the U.S. flag on owned or exclusive-use property, and state statutes commonly go further, protecting flagpoles, military service flags, state flags, and other categories the federal Act does not reach.11,12 For a multi-state operator, the practical consequence is that the federal answer is identical in every jurisdiction, so the variation that matters, on flagpoles, non-U.S. flags, size, and remedies, sits entirely on the state side.8 Readers should consult the state Flag Display column for their jurisdiction, and the political signs page for the broader display question.
HOA Weekly's federal flag display coverage updates quarterly as Congress and the courts act. Flagpole rights, military service flags, and state flags are state-law questions, covered in the Flag Display column for each jurisdiction in the state matrix.
Related Federal HOA Topics
Footnotes
- GovInfo, Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-243, § 3, 120 Stat. 572 ↩
- Office of the Law Revision Counsel, 4 U.S.C. § 5 and Statutory Notes, Freedom To Display the American Flag ↩
- Congress.gov, H.R. 42, 109th Congress (2005-2006), Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005 ↩
- GovInfo, Pub. L. 109-243, § 2 (definitions) ↩
- GovInfo, Pub. L. 109-243, § 4 (limitations) ↩
- GovInfo, Pub. L. 109-243, §§ 3-4 ↩
- Cong. Research Serv., RL30243, The United States Flag: Federal Law Relating to Display and Associated Questions ↩
- GovInfo, Pub. L. 109-243, § 3 (operative prohibition) ↩
- The Florida Senate, Fla. Stat. ch. 718 (limited common elements) as applied to exclusive-use property; see Fla. Stat. § 720.304 ↩
- Murphree v. Tides Condo. at Sweetwater by Del Webb Master Homeowners' Ass'n, No. 3:13-cv-713-J-34MCR (M.D. Fla. Mar. 31, 2014) ↩
- Texas Legislature, Tex. Prop. Code § 202.012 (Flag Display) ↩
- The Florida Senate, Fla. Stat. § 720.304(2) (display of flags; flagpole) ↩
- Cong. Research Serv., R45945, Frequently Asked Questions About Flag Law ↩
- Costanza v. Tchefuncte Harbour Ass'n, Inc., 31 F. Supp. 3d 849 (E.D. La. 2014) ↩
- Farhan v. 2715 NMA LLC, 161 F.4th 475 (7th Cir. 2025) (case analysis) ↩
- Congress.gov, All-American Flag Act, Pub. L. 118-74, 138 Stat. 1505 (2024) (S. 1973) ↩
- inewsource, San Marcos HOA Fines Residents Over American Flags (June 29, 2026) ↩