California HOAs can no longer charge any fee for an ADU
California HOAs can no longer charge any fee for an ADU
2026-09-09 · California · Compliance
A California homeowners association may still impose reasonable restrictions on an accessory dwelling unit. It may no longer charge anything for the privilege.
The change is one sentence, added to Civil Code section 714.3(b) by AB 130, Chapter 22, Statutes of 2025, effective June 30, 2025:
“'Reasonable restrictions' shall not include any fees or other financial requirements.”1
The Legislative Counsel's Digest describes the effect in the same terms: the bill “would prohibit fees and other financial requirements from being included in the above-described reasonable restrictions.”
What the section does
Section 714.3(a) voids any covenant or governing document provision that “effectively prohibits or unreasonably restricts” an ADU or junior ADU on a lot zoned for single-family residential use, where the unit meets the applicable Government Code standards. Civil Code section 4751 is its Davis-Stirling counterpart.
What survives is a genuine safe harbour: restrictions that “do not unreasonably increase the cost to construct, effectively prohibit the construction of, or extinguish the ability to otherwise construct” an ADU or JADU.
Design and aesthetic standards therefore remain available. Money does not.
The state has said the same thing in its own handbook
The Department of Housing and Community Development's Accessory Dwelling Unit Handbook, March 2026 edition, carries a dedicated homeowners association FAQ. Asked whether CC&Rs can prohibit ADU construction or use, it answers:
“No. Sections 714.3 and 4751 of the Civil Code nullify covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) that either effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the construction or use of an ADU or JADU on lots zoned to permit single-family residential uses. Such CC&Rs, including operating rules, are void and unenforceable.”2
The handbook's glossary repeats the fee prohibition verbatim, sourced to section 4751(b) and section 714.3(b). It also states what associations may still do: impose “some limited objective standards on an ADU or JADU, such as requiring, within reason, specific materials, architectural styles, or other design and aesthetic restrictions” — provided those standards are not more stringent than state ADU law.
Keep reading with the California State Pass
The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how California compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every California topic on HOA Weekly.
$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.
What you unlock
- What it changes for boards and managers
- The rental rules that travel with this
- What has not been settled
and 1 more section in detail
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?
Related California HOA Topics
- Civil Code § 714.3, California Legislative Information — operative text ('Amended by Stats. 2025, Ch. 22, Sec. 1. (AB 130) Effective June 30, 2025.') ↩
- Accessory Dwelling Unit Handbook, California Department of Housing and Community Development (March 2026 edition) — homeowners association FAQ and the 'reasonable restrictions' glossary definition ↩
- AB 130, California Legislature — chaptered text and Legislative Counsel's Digest (Chapter 22, Statutes of 2025) ↩
- CalMatters, 'California HOA triumphs over ADU law' (April 2026) — San Diego County Superior Court ruling on condominium application of the ADU statutes ↩
Stay on top of California HOA law
Every week: new California legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.