We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Eleventh Circuit affirms judgment for condo association on Fair Housing fines claims

Federal · Courts

Eleventh Circuit affirms judgment for condo association on Fair Housing fines claims

What happened. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on August 7, 2026 affirmed summary judgment for a Miami condominium association and its directors on a unit owner's Fair Housing Act disparate-treatment and hostile-housing-environment claims. The decision in Derhem v. Bay House Miami Condominium Ass'n, No. 24-13378, is unpublished and not binding precedent.1

What the court held

  • Stray remarks. An alleged racial remark by the board president was not direct evidence of discrimination, because “remarks by non-decisionmakers or remarks unrelated to the decisionmaking process itself are not direct evidence,” and the president “did not have the final say about whether to impose fines.” The court described the alleged remarks as “undoubtedly repugnant, if true.”
  • Legitimate reasons. The association documented violations “on a constant and ongoing basis” — unregistered guests, short-term room rentals and cloned key fobs. Its governing documents “clearly allow for fines and suspensions,” and “many residents faced similar consequences.”
  • Comparators. Other residents who had roommates did so under “rental agreements with the Association”; the plaintiff did not, so they were not similarly situated.
  • Hostile environment. The standard is harassment “sufficiently severe or pervasive so as to interfere with or deprive the plaintiff of her right to use or enjoy her home,” and “a single racial epithet, as abhorrent as it is, does not suffice.”1

The framework

The panel analysed the Fair Housing Act claims using employment-discrimination case law under Title VII, as the Eleventh Circuit does generally. Under that framework, an association's documented, evenly applied enforcement under its governing documents supplies the legitimate, non-discriminatory reason, and the plaintiff must then show it was a pretext. Here the record of comparable enforcement against other residents defeated the pretext showing.

What to watch next

No rehearing petition had been reported. Because the opinion is unpublished, it is persuasive only.

Related Federal HOA Topics

← All Federal HOA Topics

  1. Derhem v. Bay House Miami Condominium Ass'n, No. 24-13378 (11th Cir. Aug. 7, 2026) (unpublished) ↩

Stay on top of federal HOA law

Every week: new federal legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.