We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

A bank cannot void its own foreclosure to escape maintenance fees

Hawaii · Courts

A bank cannot void its own foreclosure to escape maintenance fees

A bank that foreclosed defectively, bought the unit itself, paid maintenance fees for a decade and then sued to have its own foreclosure declared void has lost. The Intermediate Court of Appeals vacated the judgment it had won below, and the Hawaii Supreme Court rejected certiorari on July 7, 2026.12

The Bank of New York Mellon v. Association of Apartment Owners of Palm Villas II, No. CAAP-23-0000402, was decided by summary disposition order on February 6, 2026 — unpublished, which under Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 35 limits its citation value, though not its practical significance.

What happened

BNYM nonjudicially foreclosed a mortgage at Palm Villas II in 2009. The auction was postponed three times and no postponement notice was ever published. BNYM bought the unit at its own sale, took a quitclaim conveyance, and paid the association’s maintenance fees for roughly ten years.

Then it stopped, and sued to have the 2009 foreclosure declared “null and void,” the mortgage reinstated, and its lien restored to Land Court — which would have unwound its ownership and the fee obligation that came with it. The circuit court granted it partial summary judgment.

What the ICA held

The bank had standing to seek declaratory relief under HRS § 632-1 — the association “may claim an interest in the Property by virtue of… unpaid maintenance fees,” which is a live controversy. On the merits it lost.

Quoting Delapinia v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC: “[I]f a foreclosure violates a statute governing the nonjudicial foreclosure scheme, or other law extrinsic to the mortgage itself, the sale is voidable at the election of the mortgagor.” And then the sentence that decides the case: “BNYM presented no evidence that either of its mortgagors elected to void the nonjudicial foreclosure.… BNYM’s argument is contrary to the law.”

Keep reading with the Hawaii State Pass

The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how Hawaii compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every Hawaii topic on HOA Weekly.

$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.

What you unlock

  • Why this is the most useful defensive ruling of the year for a Hawaii board
  • What to demand when the letter arrives
  • The flip side, which is not comfortable

and 2 more sections in detail

Unlock Hawaii

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?

Related Hawaii HOA Topics

← All Hawaii HOA Topics

  1. BNYM v. AOAO of Palm Villas II, No. CAAP-23-0000402, Hawaii ICA summary disposition order, February 6, 2026 ↩
  2. Order rejecting application for writ of certiorari, SCWC-23-0000402, July 7, 2026 ↩

Stay on top of Hawaii HOA law

Every week: new Hawaii legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.