Hawaii HOA Mediation & Dispute Resolution
Section 1: Overview — How HOA disputes are resolved in Hawaii
Hawaii does something only a few states do: it writes mediation and arbitration directly into its condominium statute and picks up part of the cost through a state trust fund. So in Hawaii, a live condominium conflict usually lands on a statutory dispute-resolution track before it ever reaches a courtroom. Condominiums answer to the Condominium Property Act, Haw. Rev. Stat. ch. 514B1, while non-condominium planned community associations answer to ch. 421J2 — and the two frameworks do not interchange. Chapter 514B lays out mediation (§ 514B-161), arbitration (§ 514B-162), and voluntary binding arbitration (§ 514B-162.5), and it funds condominium dispute resolution through the Condominium Education Trust Fund (CETF), which the Real Estate Commission administers inside the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (DCCA)3. Keep three arbitration tracks separate: statutory condominium arbitration under ch. 514B; contractual arbitration under Hawaii's Uniform Arbitration Act (ch. 658A4, with Federal Arbitration Act preemption when a contract touches interstate commerce); and the court-run Court-Annexed Arbitration Program (CAAP) for certain lower-value tort cases5. The money at stake is real: ch. 514B and ch. 421J each carry their own prevailing-party fee provisions, and the general assumpsit fee statute (§ 607-14) caps contract-action fees at 25 percent of the judgment6. Hawaii is a condominium-dense state with unusually developed statutory and state-supported ADR — a sharp contrast to states that leave association disputes to private contract and the courts. The sections that follow map the statutory framework, the general civil ADR tracks, the role of the recorded declaration, and the path a dispute actually travels.
Section 2: The dispute resolution framework
2A. Statutory dispute resolution under ch. 514B and ch. 421J
For condominiums, ch. 514B builds a graduated ADR structure. Start with § 514B-161: when a unit owner or the board asks to mediate a dispute over the interpretation or enforcement of the association's declaration, bylaws, or house rules, the other side must take part. Mediation here is mandatory on demand, not merely voluntary7. Each party covers its own mediation costs unless everyone agrees otherwise, and if a party refuses to participate, a court can weigh that refusal when it awards fees and costs7. Section 514B-161(b) carves out several categories from mandatory mediation — actions seeking equitable relief for threatened property damage or threats to health or safety, actions to collect assessments that are liens or face foreclosure, and actions above $2,500 where mediating would void insurance coverage7. Under § 514B-162, at any party's request a dispute over the interpretation, application, or enforcement of the chapter or the governing documents "shall be submitted to arbitration." But § 514B-163 preserves a right to trial de novo — demanded within ten days of the award and filed in circuit court within thirty days — so statutory arbitration runs as non-binding unless the parties choose otherwise8,9. Section 514B-162.5 lets the parties agree to voluntary binding arbitration after they have tried evaluative mediation10. Courts enter and review confirmed awards through ch. 658A8.
The Condominium Education Trust Fund is what sets Hawaii apart. Section 514B-71 creates the fund and directs the Real Estate Commission to spend it on education, more efficient administration of associations, and "expeditious and inexpensive procedures for resolving association disputes" — including support for mediation and voluntary binding arbitration11. Section 514B-72 fills the fund through biennial per-unit fees; DCCA's 2025–2027 condominium association biennial registration lists a Condominium Education Trust Fund fee of $7.00 per unit plus a dedicated CETF mediation fee of $3.00 per unit under § 514B-72(a)(2)12. In practice, the CETF subsidizes evaluative mediation run by community mediation centers: through the Mediation Center of the Pacific, each party pays the first hour at $375 and the fund covers the rest, up to a maximum of eight hours13. The results have been mixed. Legislative findings in SB1498 (2025) reported that CETF-subsidized mediation ran "thirty-eight per cent mediated to 'no agreement', thirty-seven per cent mediated 'to agreement', and most of the remaining twenty-five per cent withdrawn because one or more parties declined to participate"14. A repeal-and-reenactment sunset once threatened §§ 514B-71, 514B-72, and 514B-161 — set for June 30, 2023 — but Act 57, Session Laws of Hawaii 2020, deleted it, so those provisions now stand permanently11.
For planned community associations, ch. 421J is far thinner. Section 421J-13 says that, at any party's request, a dispute over the interpretation, application, or enforcement of the chapter or the association documents "shall first be submitted to mediation," with exclusions that track ch. 514B — equitable relief for threatened damage or safety, assessment collection, personal injury, and insurance-voiding claims above $2,50015. Chapter 421J carries no statutory arbitration provision to match § 514B-162 and no trust-fund subsidy; DCCA confirms that no government agency oversees ch. 421J or ch. 421I associations16. The two frameworks do not interchange, so every Hawaii association dispute starts with one question: is this community a condominium (ch. 514B) or a planned community association (ch. 421J)? The answer decides which statutory tracks are even on the table.
2B. General civil ADR, arbitration tracks, and the courts
Hawaii governs contractual arbitration through its version of the Uniform Arbitration Act, ch. 658A, which controls whether an arbitration agreement is valid, how parties move to compel or stay, and how courts confirm, vacate, or modify awards4. Where an association's declaration or a related contract touches interstate commerce, the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) can preempt conflicting state limits on arbitration. This contractual track stands apart from the statutory condominium arbitration in § 514B-162.
The Court-Annexed Arbitration Program is a third, distinct track. Established under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 601-20 and run under the Hawaii Arbitration Rules, CAAP is a mandatory, non-binding program that automatically takes in every tort case filed in Circuit Court with a probable jury-award value of $150,000 or less, and it preserves a right to request a trial de novo5,17. The Judiciary warns that if the appealing party fails to improve on the arbitration award by 30 percent or more at the trial de novo, the trial court may impose penalties on that party17. Because CAAP keys to tort cases, most association disputes fall outside it — they sound in contract, governing-document enforcement, or statutory interpretation, not tort. So CAAP rarely handles a routine assessment or covenant fight.
Court-annexed mediation runs through the Judiciary's Center for Alternative Dispute Resolution (CADR), established within the Judiciary under ch. 61318. CADR contracts with community mediation centers statewide — the Mediation Center of the Pacific on Oahu and neighbor-island centers among them — and runs an appellate mediation program for the Intermediate Court of Appeals19. Court ADR is generally voluntary and facilitative; it supplements the statutory condominium tracks rather than replacing them.
2C. CC&R-based dispute resolution and order of precedence
The recorded declaration often adds its own dispute-resolution layer on top of the statutory framework. Common clauses require mediation as a condition precedent to suit, set arbitration provisions (which draw on ch. 658A and, where interstate commerce is present, the FAA), select venue, and award attorney's fees to the prevailing party. Many governing documents also build internal grievance procedures and architectural-review appeals that owners must exhaust before they reach external ADR. Precedence runs from the governing statute (ch. 514B or ch. 421J) down to the declaration, then the bylaws, then the rules — and a governing-document clause cannot override a mandatory statutory requirement1. In practice, a manager has to identify which statute governs, decide whether a statutory ADR track applies (§ 514B-161 mediation or § 514B-162 arbitration for condominiums, or § 421J-13 mediation for planned communities), and then read the declaration's dispute clause against that statutory backdrop.
Section 3: Dispute resolution pathways and obligations
A. Internal / association-level resolution
- Notice-and-hearing rights kick in before an association imposes fines or takes certain adverse actions; separate coverage handles those fining mechanics. Applies to condominiums (ch. 514B) and planned community associations (ch. 421J); statutory and contractual.
- Internal grievance procedures and architectural-review appeals flow from the recorded governing documents. Applies to both; contractual (declaration-based).
B. Mediation
- Statutory condominium mediation under § 514B-161 becomes mandatory the moment a unit owner or board requests it, for disputes over the declaration, bylaws, or house rules — subject to the § 514B-161(b) exclusions; each party pays its own costs unless it agrees otherwise7. Condominiums (ch. 514B); statutory.
- CETF-subsidized evaluative mediation runs through community mediation centers, with the fund covering costs beyond each party's $375 first-hour fee13. Condominiums (ch. 514B); statutory / administrative.
- Planned community association mediation under § 421J-13 is required on request before a higher-court filing, with parallel exclusions and no state subsidy15. Planned community associations (ch. 421J); statutory.
- The Judiciary's CADR and community mediation centers offer voluntary, generally confidential mediation for referred civil matters18. Both; rule-based / statutory (ch. 613).
C. Arbitration
- Statutory condominium arbitration under § 514B-162 proceeds at any party's request but stays non-binding, because § 514B-163 preserves a trial de novo8,9. Condominiums (ch. 514B); statutory.
- Voluntary binding arbitration under § 514B-162.5 is available by agreement after evaluative mediation10. Condominiums (ch. 514B); statutory.
- Contractual (declaration) arbitration runs under ch. 658A, with FAA preemption for interstate-commerce contracts; it binds the parties subject to limited statutory review4. Both; contractual / federal.
- CAAP is mandatory and non-binding for tort cases at or under $150,000 and generally does not capture contract-based association disputes5. Both (rarely applicable); rule-based (Hawaii Arbitration Rules).
D. Litigation and appeals
- Trial-level association disputes proceed in the Circuit Courts (general jurisdiction) or District Courts (lower-value matters), and appeals run to the Intermediate Court of Appeals, with discretionary review by the Hawaii Supreme Court. Both; statutory / rule-based.
- Condominium fee awards run through § 514B-157, which is mandatory — fees "shall be awarded": a substantiated owner claim entitles the owner to fees, and an unsubstantiated owner claim entitles the association to fees unless the owner first tried mediation or arbitration in good faith20. Condominiums (ch. 514B); statutory.
- Planned community fee awards run through § 421J-10 on a prevailing-party basis, with a comparable pre-suit mediation safe harbor21. Planned community associations (ch. 421J); statutory.
- Section 607-14 governs assumpsit (contract) fees and caps them at 25 percent of the judgment, but planned community associations escape that cap for collection, foreclosure, and governing-document enforcement6. Both; statutory.
- The general limitations period for contract actions runs six years under § 657-122. Both; statutory.
E. Administrative and agency pathway (Hawaii-specific)
- The DCCA, the Real Estate Commission, and the condominium specialists provide education, information, and referral for condominiums under ch. 514B; these functions are facilitative and educational, not adjudicative23. Condominiums (ch. 514B); administrative.
- The Regulated Industries Complaints Office (RICO) receives and investigates a narrow set of condominium complaints — chiefly records access under §§ 514B-154 and 514B-154.5 and fund-handling under § 514B-149; it does not adjudicate private condominium disputes, and neither the Real Estate Branch nor the Attorney General represents individuals in them24. Condominiums (ch. 514B); administrative.
- The Condominium Education Trust Fund supports condominium dispute resolution by subsidizing mediation and voluntary binding arbitration — a funding role, not an adjudicative one11. Condominiums (ch. 514B); statutory / administrative. No comparable agency oversees planned community associations under ch. 421J16. Separate coverage addresses the fining and collections-and-liens mechanics that often precede these disputes.
Section 4: Recent legislative and judicial activity
A. Recent bills
Hawaii's dispute-resolution debate is moving in one clear direction: toward a state office that would sit between owners and their associations. The leading vehicle is an ombudsman proposal that would restructure how the state funds and delivers association ADR.
HB837 · 2025 Regular Session
HB837 would establish an ombudsman's office for homeowner associations inside the DCCA — an office that would receive complaints, run dispute intervention, and fold the existing condominium specialists in as intake specialists — funded by the Condominium Education Trust Fund and by new assessments on ch. 421I and 421J associations.25 The bill's findings assert that "Hawaii has the nation's highest number of association directors' and officers' liability insurance claims," a figure the findings call more alarming because the state "has a disproportionately small number of homeowners associations compared to other states."25 As of the last verification, it had not become law and carried over to the 2026 session.25
| Property managers | Nothing changes yet — but watch for a new DCCA complaint and dispute-intervention channel that would sit alongside statutory mediation. |
| HOA board members | If it passes, board members could face mandatory education requirements and a state office stepping into disputes. |
| Community association attorneys | Track this one — it would restructure the CETF ADR model and create administrative enforcement that doesn't exist today. |
| Homeowners | Owners could gain a low-cost state office to hear complaints — but the bill isn't law yet. |
B. Recent appellate rulings
Two recent decisions show Hawaii's appellate courts holding associations to the limits of their authority — one on the damages an association owes when it forecloses without the power to do so, and one on what an association must prove before it enters units and then collects its fees.
Wong v. Association of Apartment Owners of Harbor Square
The court held that damages for a wrongful non-judicial foreclosure by an association that lacked foreclosure authority equal "the plaintiff's positive equity in the property, if any, (property's market value minus outstanding mortgage debt), plus lost use arising from the wrongful foreclosure, minus assessments owed to the AOAO." On this record — a unit worth $448,000 in 2011 against $481,298 of mortgage debt, with the debt later discharged at $711,699 — the court affirmed summary judgment for the association because the owner "failed to establish lost use value."26
| Property managers | Confirm the association has clear statutory authority before any nonjudicial collection remedy; a defective foreclosure creates damages exposure. |
| HOA board members | Boards can face liability for foreclosures that exceed statutory authority — even when the owner is underwater. |
| Community association attorneys | The decision sets the damages formula for wrongful-foreclosure claims against associations. |
| Homeowners | An owner wrongly foreclosed on must prove positive equity or lost-use value to recover. |
Association of Apartment Owners of Regency Park v. Harder
The ICA vacated part of a final judgment and the attached attorney-fee award because the association had not shown that installing fire alarms inside owners' units was legally required, or that no practicable alternative existed; the court affirmed the other rulings and remanded.27
| Property managers | Document the legal basis and the alternatives before you enter units to make alterations; an unsupported record can undo a fee award. |
| HOA board members | A fee award tied to enforcement can be vacated if the underlying enforcement authority isn't proven. |
| Community association attorneys | Build the evidentiary record on statutory or code compulsion before seeking summary judgment and § 514B-157 fees. |
| Homeowners | Owners can challenge both the enforcement action and any attached fee award where the association's authority is unproven. |
C. Active legislative debates
The policy debate keeps circling the same ground: condominium owner education and a possible DCCA dispute-resolution office. Ombudsman proposals recur across sessions — HB837 carried into 2026 — and lawmakers have 2026 measures on the Condominium Education Trust Fund and a condominium ombudsman office under consideration rather than enacted25.
Section 5: National positioning and related coverage
Hawaii sits at the interventionist end of the spectrum for association dispute resolution. Rather than leaving conflicts to private contract and the courts, as many states do, or folding everything into a single comprehensive common-interest statute, Hawaii writes mediation and arbitration into its condominium statute and backs them with a dedicated state fund. The statutory condominium ADR tracks — §§ 514B-161, 514B-162, and 514B-162.5 — together with the Condominium Education Trust Fund's mediation subsidy, shape how condominium disputes play out, pushing many conflicts into evaluative mediation before anyone files suit. For multi-state operators, the threshold questions in Hawaii are structural: is a community a condominium under ch. 514B or a planned community association under ch. 421J, and which statutory ADR track does that classification trigger? The answer determines whether mandatory mediation, statutory arbitration, and state subsidy are even available.
Federal frameworks also bear on Hawaii association disputes, regardless of the state framework — the Federal Arbitration Act above all, along with the FHA, ADA, FDCPA, SCRA, and the OTARD rule.
- Haw. Rev. Stat. ch. 514B, Condominium Property Act (chapter contents and § 514B-1 short title) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. ch. 421J, Planned Community Associations (chapter contents) ↩
- DCCA Real Estate Branch, "What Services Does the Real Estate Branch (REB) Provide to the Condominium Community?" (CETF and Real Estate Commission role) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. ch. 658A, Uniform Arbitration Act ↩
- Hawaii State Judiciary, Court-Annexed Arbitration Program (CAAP): tort cases with probable jury-award value of $150,000 or less; non-binding; trial de novo ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 607-14, Attorneys' fees in actions in the nature of assumpsit (25 percent cap; planned community association exception) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 514B-161, Mediation (mandatory participation on request; cost allocation; subsection (b) exclusions; CETF-supported mediation fee provisions) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 514B-162, Arbitration (dispute "shall be submitted to arbitration"; exclusions; award confirmation under ch. 658A) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 514B-163, Trial de novo and appeal (ten-day demand; thirty-day filing in circuit court) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 514B-162.5, Voluntary binding arbitration (available after evaluative mediation; CETF support) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 514B-71, Condominium education trust fund (uses include support for mediation and voluntary binding arbitration; June 30, 2023 repeal-reenactment sunset deleted by L 2020, c 57, § 2) ↩
- Hawaii Condominium Association Registration (DCCA/eHawaii), CETF fee $7.00 per unit and CETF-Mediation fee $3.00 per unit under HRS § 514B-72(a)(2) ↩
- Mediation Center of the Pacific, Condominium Mediation ($375 first-hour party fee; CETF subsidy up to eight hours) ↩
- Hawaii SB1498 (2025 Reg. Sess.), legislative findings on CETF-subsidized mediation outcomes (38% no agreement, 37% to agreement, ~25% withdrawn) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 421J-13, Mediation of disputes ("shall first be submitted to mediation"; parallel exclusions) ↩
- DCCA Real Estate Branch, Condominium FAQs (no government agency has oversight of HRS ch. 421J or 421I; ADR options for non-condominium associations) ↩
- Hawaii State Judiciary, CAAP (non-binding; 30 percent improvement threshold at trial de novo may trigger penalties) ↩
- Hawaii State Judiciary, Center for Alternative Dispute Resolution (CADR) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 613-2, Establishment of the Center for Alternative Dispute Resolution within the Judiciary ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 514B-157, Attorneys' fees, delinquent assessments, and expenses of enforcement (mandatory fee awards; mediation/arbitration safe harbor) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 421J-10, Attorneys' fees and expenses of enforcement (prevailing-party awards; pre-suit mediation exception) ↩
- Haw. Rev. Stat. § 657-1, Six years (limitations period for contract actions) ↩
- DCCA Real Estate Branch, "Can the Real Estate Commission Step in to Resolve Disputes...?" (self-governance model; limited government intervention) ↩
- DCCA Real Estate Branch, "Where Do I File a Condominium Complaint?" (RICO's limited investigative authority; disputes outside it go to mediation, arbitration, or litigation) ↩
- Hawaii HB837 (2025 Reg. Sess.), Relating To Homeowner Associations (ombudsman's office; findings on D&O insurance claims; carried over to 2026) ↩
- Wong v. Association of Apartment Owners of Harbor Square, No. SCAP-22-0000552 (Haw. Feb. 29, 2024), 154 Hawai'i 58, 545 P.3d 547 ↩
- Association of Apartment Owners of Regency Park v. Harder, No. CAAP-20-0000373 (Haw. Ct. App. Sept. 16, 2024) (memorandum opinion) ↩