Illinois HOA Budget Approval
Section 1: Overview, how HOA budgets are approved in Illinois
In Illinois, a community association's budget takes effect the moment the board adopts it. Owners never pre-approve it. They can overturn it just one way — by petitioning for a meeting and then voting it down, a process the statutes call petition-to-reject. Two separate laws spell it out: the Condominium Property Act (765 ILCS 605) for condominiums, and the Common Interest Community Association Act, or CICAA (765 ILCS 160), for non-condominium planned and townhome communities. Under both, the board adopts the proposed annual budget. If that budget, together with any separate (special) assessments, would push the year's total regular and separate assessments past 115% of what owners paid the year before, owners holding 20% of the association's votes can petition for a meeting. The budget still stands unless a majority of all the association's votes are cast to reject it. Illinois is not a negative-option (UCIOA) state, and it is not an increase-cap state. The 115% figure caps nothing and forces no advance owner approval; it simply unlocks the owners' right to demand a rejection vote. Reserves work the same practical way: the Condominium Property Act ties the reserve amount to the board's judgment and a set of enumerated factors, not to a fixed reserve-study or minimum-funding mandate. CICAA leaves the smallest communities out entirely — those organized under the General Not For Profit Corporation Act of 1986 with 10 or fewer units, or with annual budgeted assessments of $100,000 or less — unless they choose to opt in. Illinois runs all of this through its own detailed statutes rather than the uniform act, which gives it a distinctive budget-override mechanism instead of the negative-option ratification model. The table and the per-statute walkthrough below lay out the mechanics for each law.
Section 2: The budget approval mechanism
The table below maps the Condominium Property Act (765 ILCS 605) for condominiums against CICAA (765 ILCS 160) for common interest communities; CICAA leaves smaller associations out of its coverage.
2A. Quick-Reference Budget Mechanics Table
| Parameter | Condominiums (765 ILCS 605) | Common interest communities (765 ILCS 160, CICAA) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Governing statute section(s) | 765 ILCS 605/18(a)(8); reserves at 765 ILCS 605/9(c)1 | 765 ILCS 160/1-452 |
| 2. Community types covered | Condominium associations (property submitted to the Act by recorded declaration)1 | Non-condominium common interest communities (townhomes, villas, single-family HOAs)2 |
| 3. Body that adopts the proposed budget | Board of managers1 | Board of managers/directors2 |
| 4. Approval model | Board adoption effective on adoption, subject to owner petition-to-reject if the 115% trigger is met1 | Board adoption effective on adoption, subject to owner petition-to-reject if the 115% trigger is met2 |
| 5. Budget summary distribution deadline | At least 25 days before adoption by the board3 | At least 30 but not more than 60 days before adoption by the board2 |
| 6. Ratification meeting notice window | No ratification meeting required; if a qualifying petition is delivered, the board must call a meeting within 30 days of delivery of the petition1 | No ratification meeting required; if a qualifying petition is delivered, the board must call a meeting within 30 days of delivery of the petition2 |
| 7. Owner rejection threshold | Petition to call a meeting: owners with 20% of the votes, delivered within 21 days of the board action; rejection at the meeting: a majority of the total votes of the association1 | Petition to call a meeting: owners with 20% of the votes, delivered within 14 days of the board action; rejection at the meeting: a majority of the total votes of the association2 |
| 8. Quorum required to ratify | No member ratification vote or quorum required for the budget to take effect; budget is effective on board adoption1 | No member ratification vote or quorum required for the budget to take effect; budget is effective on board adoption2 |
| 9. Effect of owner rejection | If a majority of total votes are cast at the meeting to reject, the budget or separate assessment is rejected; otherwise it is ratified1 | If a majority of total votes are cast at the meeting to reject, the budget or separate assessment is rejected (deemed ratified if not)2 |
| 10. Statutory cap on assessment increase absent owner vote | None; the 115% figure is a petition-to-reject trigger, not a pre-approval cap1 | None; the 115% figure is a petition-to-reject trigger, not a pre-approval cap2 |
| 11. Special assessment approval threshold | Separate assessments adopted by board, subject to the same 115% petition-to-reject; assessments for additions/alterations not in the budget require 2/3 of total votes; emergency or legally mandated assessments exempt1 | Separate assessments adopted by board, subject to the same 115% petition-to-reject; assessments for additions/alterations not in the budget require a simple majority of total members; emergency or legally mandated assessments exempt2 |
| 12. Reserve study mandate (and frequency) | Not mandated; board must consider any independent professional reserve study it may obtain4 | Not specified by statute; governed by recorded declaration2 |
| 13. Reserve funding mandate | Budgets must provide for reasonable reserves; the amount is set by board judgment using five enumerated factors; waivable by 2/3 vote4 | Proposed budget must indicate the portion intended for reserves; no enumerated-factor funding standard in the Act2 |
| 14. Audit or financial review tied to budget cycle | Annual itemized accounting to unit owners; no mandatory annual independent audit by statute; GAAP standards apply under Section 18.105 | Annual summary of receipts, expenses and reserves, or a consolidated annual independent audit; associations of 100+ units must use GAAP2 |
| 15. Provisions variable by declaration | Quorum percentages, surplus/deficit handling, and reserve requirements in the instruments may vary by declaration1 | Administration governed by the declaration, bylaws or operating agreement except where the Act controls2 |
2B. The petition-to-reject sequence under each statute
The two statutes run the same play, and they differ in only two details. For condominiums, the board first hands the proposed annual budget to every unit owner at least 25 days before it adopts the budget. The board then adopts the budget, and the budget is effective on adoption. If the adopted budget — or any separate assessment the board adopts — would push the sum of all regular and separate assessments payable in the current fiscal year past 115% of the sum payable the year before, unit owners holding 20% of the association's votes may deliver a written petition to the board within 21 days of the board action. The board must then call a meeting of the unit owners within 30 days of delivery. Unless a majority of the association's total votes are cast at that meeting to reject the budget or separate assessment, it is ratified. The Condominium Property Act lays out these steps at 765 ILCS 605/18(a)(8).
For common interest communities, the board distributes the proposed annual budget at least 30 but not more than 60 days before adoption, adopts the budget (effective on adoption), and works under the same 115% trigger. Two things change. Under CICAA, members holding 20% of the votes must deliver the petition within 14 days of the board action, not 21; the board then calls a member meeting within 30 days, and unless a majority of the total votes are cast to reject, the budget is deemed ratified. CICAA sets out these steps at 765 ILCS 160/1-45(c).
Some assessments sit outside the 115% calculation. Under the Condominium Property Act, the board may adopt separate assessments for emergencies or for expenditures the law mandates without exposing them to the 115% petition-to-reject; the Act defines an "emergency" as an immediate danger to the structural integrity of the common elements or to the life, health, safety or property of the unit owners (765 ILCS 605/18(a)(8)(iv)). CICAA carries a parallel exclusion for emergency or legally mandated separate assessments and defines "emergency" as a danger to or compromise of the structural integrity of the common areas or facilities, or a danger to the life, health or safety of the membership (765 ILCS 160/1-45(e)).
This is petition-to-reject — not negative-option ratification, and not an increase cap. No required meeting automatically ratifies the budget the way the UCIOA negative-option model does, and no ceiling forces advance owner approval before an increase takes effect the way California's cap does. The budget is effective on board adoption; the 115% threshold only decides whether owners may force a rejection vote. Adopting the budget is one step; levying the assessment is another. The board adopts the budget and then assesses each owner's proportionate share, and it separately assesses any common expense the budget left out or any increase over the budgeted amount (765 ILCS 605/18(a)(8)(iii)).
2C. Reserves, CICAA exemptions, and variation
Under the Condominium Property Act, every budget a board adopts on or after July 1, 1990 must provide reasonable reserves for capital expenditures and deferred maintenance to repair or replace the common elements. To set the amount, the board weighs five enumerated factors: the repair and replacement cost and estimated useful life of the property the association must maintain; the current and anticipated return on the association's invested funds; any independent professional reserve study the association obtains; the financial impact on unit owners, and on unit market value, of any assessment increase needed to fund reserves; and the association's ability to borrow (765 ILCS 605/9(c)(2)). That is a board-judgment-plus-factors standard, not a fixed reserve-study mandate or a minimum-funding percentage. An association whose condominium instruments set no reserve requirement may waive the reserve requirement in whole or in part by a 2/3 vote (765 ILCS 605/9(c)(3)). CICAA requires the proposed budget to indicate the portion intended for reserves (765 ILCS 160/1-45(a)) but carries none of the enumerated-factor standard found in the Condominium Property Act.
CICAA also exempts the smallest communities. A common interest community association organized under the General Not For Profit Corporation Act of 1986 with either 10 units or fewer or annual budgeted assessments of $100,000 or less falls outside CICAA unless a majority of its directors or members elects coverage (765 ILCS 160/1-75(a)).6 A separate, narrower exemption — 10 units or fewer, or annual budgeted assessments of $50,000 or less — relieves certain associations from specified board, meeting and fidelity-insurance sections (765 ILCS 160/1-75(b)). Many budget provisions default to the recorded declaration, bylaws or operating agreement, which governs administration except where the Act controls. On top of all this sits a corporate-law layer: many Illinois associations are organized under the General Not For Profit Corporation Act of 1986 (805 ILCS 105), which supplies corporate formalities but imposes no budget-approval threshold of its own.
Section 3: Budget-adjacent obligations
A. Reserves in the budget
The Condominium Property Act requires condominium budgets to provide reasonable reserves, sets the amount by board judgment under five enumerated factors, and lets a board waive that requirement only by a 2/3 vote (765 ILCS 605/9(c)). CICAA requires the proposed budget to identify the portion intended for reserves but fixes no funding formula (765 ILCS 160/1-45(a)). Both are mandatory disclosure obligations rather than fixed-percentage funding mandates.
B. Special assessments
Under the Condominium Property Act, the board may adopt separate (special) assessments, which count toward the 115% calculation and so can trigger the same petition-to-reject right; assessments for additions and alterations not in the budget require 2/3 of total votes, and emergency or legally mandated assessments are exempt (765 ILCS 605/18(a)(8)). CICAA treats separate assessments the same way for the 115% trigger, requires a simple majority of total members for additions and alterations, and exempts emergency or legally mandated assessments (765 ILCS 160/1-45(e), (f)).
C. Assessment increase limits
No statutory cap requires advance owner approval before an assessment increase takes effect. The 115% figure in both statutes is the trigger for the owners' petition-to-reject right, not a ceiling. A board may adopt a budget that exceeds 115% of the prior year, and the increase takes effect on adoption unless owners petition and then reject it (765 ILCS 605/18(a)(8); 765 ILCS 160/1-45(c)).
D. Financial review, audit, and disclosure tied to the budget cycle
The Condominium Property Act requires the board to give unit owners an annual itemized accounting of common expenses, reserves, capital expenditures and real estate taxes, with a tabulation of amounts collected and the net excess or deficit (765 ILCS 605/18(a)(7)); it does not mandate an annual independent audit, though Section 18.10 applies generally accepted accounting principles. CICAA requires a reasonably detailed annual summary of receipts, common expenses and reserves, with either an itemized accounting available for review or a consolidated annual independent audit, and it requires associations of 100 or more units to use generally accepted accounting principles (765 ILCS 160/1-45(b), (i)).
Section 4: Recent legislative and judicial activity
A. Recent bills
No bill that would change the budget-approval mechanism — the 115% petition-to-reject right — or the reserve-funding standard became law in the past 24 months. The most active budget-adjacent proposal was a reserve-study mandate.
HB 2563 · 104th General Assembly
HB2563 would have required condominium associations and common interest communities with major shared components to conduct and update a reserve study at least every five years; any association without a study completed on or after January 1, 2024 would have had to finish one by January 1, 2028. The bill would have opened the study to prospective purchasers and exempted associations of 15 or fewer units, while still holding those boards to the budgeting and reserve requirements elsewhere in the Act. Democratic sponsors carried it; the last recorded action added a co-sponsor on August 26, 2025, after which it stayed in committee and never became law. A companion reserve-study bill (HB220) in the prior General Assembly also failed.7
| Property managers | You would need to schedule and budget for a reserve study at least every five years and retain it for resale disclosures. |
| HOA board members | Boards would face a fixed study cadence instead of the current board-judgment reserve standard, with an exemption only for associations of 15 or fewer units. |
| Community association attorneys | You would advise on study timing and exemption eligibility and on conforming governing documents to the new statutory cadence. |
| Homeowners | You would gain a recurring, independent read on reserve adequacy and access to the study when buying or selling. |
B. Recent appellate rulings
One recent appellate decision speaks directly to a board's authority over the common elements and to its power to bill enforcement costs; an older, non-precedential ruling rounds out the picture on the limits of unilateral assessment power.
Claymoor Condominium Ass'n v. Majewska
The Third District held that a unit owner may not modify any common element — even a limited common element the owner alone uses — without board approval, and that an association need not prove it took a formal vote before suing to enforce its declaration. The court affirmed a fee and cost award of $96,155.08 charged to the owner's account under the declaration and Section 9.2 of the Act. The decision confirms a board's authority to enforce its governing documents and to charge enforcement costs to an owner's account.8
| Property managers | Document board approvals and notice steps before you charge enforcement costs to an owner's account. |
| HOA board members | Your authority over the common elements is broad, but enforcement and charge-back depend on following the declaration. |
| Community association attorneys | A board can ratify earlier action by filing suit, and fee awards under a declaration can run high. |
| Homeowners | You cannot alter common or limited common elements without board approval, and you may end up paying the enforcement costs. |
A separate, older decision — Morgan's Orchard Lake Homeowners' Ass'n v. Morgan, 2022 IL App (3d) 220006-U — held that a CICAA board could not collect regular assessments it levied on its own where the declaration handed that authority to the voting members. It predates the 36-month window and is a non-precedential Rule 23 order, but it makes the point plainly: CICAA does not displace declaration-based assessment authority.
C. Active legislative debates
Reserve-study mandates remain the most active area of debate, and lawmakers keep reintroducing bills modeled on the failed HB2563 and HB220. Separately, the Illinois Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Greenswag v. Lieberman Management Services, Inc. (No. 1-24-0289) on September 24, 2025, taking up Section 22.1 resale-disclosure fees — a budget-adjacent disclosure question that is still pending.
Section 5: National positioning and related coverage
Illinois is a non-UCIOA state that runs on its own detailed statutes — the Condominium Property Act and CICAA — with a distinctive petition-to-reject budget mechanism. That model parts ways with the UCIOA negative-option family, in which a required member meeting automatically ratifies a board-proposed budget unless owners reject it; with California's increase-cap model, which limits how much a board may raise assessments without an owner vote; and with declaration-only states, which leave budget approval entirely to recorded documents. The contrast with the negative-option states is sharp: in Illinois the budget is effective on board adoption, and no meeting happens at all unless owners petition after the 115% trigger is met, while the negative-option model requires a ratification meeting and treats owner silence as approval. For a multi-state operator entering Illinois, the practical point is simple — the budget takes effect on adoption, and the questions that decide everything are whether the increase crosses the 115% threshold and whether owners exercise the petition right.
HOA Weekly's Illinois budget-approval coverage updates quarterly as the General Assembly and the Illinois courts act. Federal frameworks — the FHA, the ADA, the FDCPA, the SCRA, and OTARD — apply to Illinois associations no matter what the state budget rules say.
- 765 ILCS 605/18, Condominium Property Act, Contents of bylaws (Illinois General Assembly) ↩
- 765 ILCS 160/1-45, Common Interest Community Association Act, Finances (Illinois General Assembly) ↩
- 765 ILCS 605/18(a)(6) (Illinois General Assembly) ↩
- 765 ILCS 605/9(c), Budget and reserves (Illinois General Assembly) ↩
- 765 ILCS 605/18.10, Generally accepted accounting principles (Illinois General Assembly) ↩
- 765 ILCS 160/1-75, Exemptions for small common interest communities (Illinois General Assembly) ↩
- Illinois HB2563, 104th General Assembly, CONDO-RESERVE STUDY (status and synopsis) ↩
- Claymoor Condominium Ass'n v. Majewska, 2024 IL App (3d) 230171 (Illinois Courts) ↩