We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

No non-waiver clause, nobody enforcing — and the covenant still held

Kentucky · Courts

No non-waiver clause, nobody enforcing — and the covenant still held

What happened. The Kentucky Court of Appeals upheld enforcement of subdivision covenants in a community that had no non-waiver clause and where no entity was enforcing the outbuilding restrictions at all — affirming an order that the offending structure be removed.1

Muth v. Phillips, No. 2024-CA-1033-MR, was rendered on 15 August 2025 on appeal from Madison Circuit Court. Judge Cetrulo wrote. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

The test the court applied

Following Colliver and Bagby, the court held that non-enforcement defeats a covenant only where it has produced a fundamental change in the character of the neighbourhood. Relaxation short of that does not extinguish the restriction. Quoting Hardesty v. Silver, covenants remain enforceable despite relaxation when “there still remains something of substantial value to those entitled to benefit [from the restrictive covenants].”

The circuit judge had personally inspected the subdivision twice and found no such change. That finding carried the case.

Removal of the outbuilding was affirmed as the remedy for what the court treated as an intentional breach.

Why the absent non-waiver clause matters

Kentucky declarations written from the 1990s onward usually contain a clause stating that failure to enforce is not a waiver. Declarations from the 1960s and 1970s frequently do not, and boards in those communities are often told their covenants are effectively dead.

Muth says otherwise. Kentucky law does not require a non-waiver clause. The doctrine that protects the covenant is the fundamental-change test, and it operates whether or not the document anticipates it.

Keep reading with the Kentucky State Pass

The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how Kentucky compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every Kentucky topic on HOA Weekly.

$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.

What you unlock

  • Reading this against the case decided a week later
  • What that means you have to be able to prove
  • The site visit is worth noticing

and 2 more sections in detail

Unlock Kentucky

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?

Related Kentucky HOA Topics

← All Kentucky HOA Topics

  1. Muth v. Phillips, No. 2024-CA-1033-MR (Ky. App. 15 Aug. 2025) (not to be published) — opinion PDF ↩
  2. Strause v. Bradford Grove Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., No. 2024-CA-0788-MR (Ky. App. 22 Aug. 2025) ↩
  3. Russell v. Nunn, No. 2025-CA-1349-MR (Ky. App. 7 Aug. 2026) — the separate limitations bar ↩

Stay on top of Kentucky HOA law

Every week: new Kentucky legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.