A claim payment no longer buys a Louisiana association more time to sue
A claim payment no longer buys a Louisiana association more time to sue
2026-09-10 · Louisiana · Courts
What happened. Louisiana's rule on how long a policyholder has to sue its own property insurer changed twice in 2026, in opposite directions, ninety-five days apart. The net effect for a community association is a hard twenty-four-month deadline with no cushion — and no warning letter.
March 6, 2026: the Supreme Court's holding
Bryan v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, No. 2025-C-00443 (La. March 6, 2026) (Cole, J.), on writ of certiorari to the Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. Affirmed and remanded.
“We agree that an unconditional payment on a first-party insurance claim constitutes an acknowledgment under La. C.C. art. 3464 sufficient to interrupt prescription.”
The court was careful about the limits of that:
“Our holding is limited to unconditional payments—specifically, payments made without qualification, condition, or reservation of rights. See Clark v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 00–3010, p. 18 (La. 5/15/01), 785 So.2d 779, 791. Not all payments constitute acknowledgment sufficient to interrupt prescription. For example, a payment made in settlement of a claim (La. C.C. art. 3071) would not interrupt prescription, nor would a partial payment under protest (La. C.C. art. 1861). Additionally, interruption of prescription is personal in nature, extending only to those who have a right of action under the policy.”
The facts show what was at stake: an unconditional tender of $23,097.55 on March 1, 2022; the insurer placed in receivership in June 2022; an amended petition substituting the Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association filed October 24, 2023 — timely, because it fell within two years of the tender.1
June 9, 2026: the Legislature's answer
Act 876 of the 2026 Regular Session (House Bill 1117, Rep. Firment) amended R.S. 22:868(B). Senate final passage May 31, 2026; enrolled June 1; signed June 9, 2026, effective the same day for the operative sentence:
“An insurer's payment under the terms of a policy of insurance classified and defined in R.S. 22:47(6), (10) through (13), (15), and (19) shall not be considered the acknowledgment of a debt or otherwise serve to extend the contractually defined prescriptive period which begins running at the inception of the loss.”
Why the list of classes is the whole story for an association
Act 876 reaches policies “classified and defined in R.S. 22:47(6), (10) through (13), (15), and (19).” Paragraph (10) is “Fire and allied lines” — the class in which a condominium or subdivision association master policy is written.
So an association is inside the reversal. It has lost the Bryan interruption.
Now read the replacement protection, which takes effect January 1, 2027:
“(2) If an insurer issues an unconditional payment on a claim filed under the dwelling coverage or other structures coverage of a homeowners' policy, the insurer shall provide written notice to the claimant that the payment does not interrupt, suspend, or otherwise extend the prescription period applicable to the claim.”
“[H]omeowners' policy.” And R.S. 22:47(15) defines homeowners' insurance as “[a] policy of insurance on a one- or two-family owner-occupied premises.” An association master policy is not one.
An association therefore loses the interruption and does not get the warning letter. A unit owner, on an HO-6, gets both halves. That asymmetry is not an oversight anyone has announced fixing, and it is the single most consequential Louisiana insurance development of the year for a board.2
The deadline, as it applies to a board
Twenty-four months from the inception of the loss, for a first-party claim as defined in R.S. 22:1692 arising under the enumerated classes. Running from the loss, not from the denial, not from the last payment, and — after June 9, 2026 — not extended by a payment however unconditional.
One question we are not going to answer: whether Act 876 applies to a claim whose prescription had already been interrupted under Bryan before June 9, 2026. The Act's Section 3 makes subsection (B)(1) effective on signature with no stated retroactivity. That is precisely the kind of individual question that turns on dates and facts, and it belongs with counsel rather than in a summary.
What this changes about how a board runs a claim
Three habits become dangerous.
Letting an appraisal drift. A Louisiana association in a supplemental-claim negotiation, or in appraisal, cannot treat interim payments as evidence that the clock is still open. It is not.
Waiting for the association's own decision-making. R.S. 9:1145(E) requires board approval to commence an enforcement action, and boards meet on their own schedule — now under a thirty-day notice requirement unless the meeting is on a previously circulated schedule, under R.S. 9:1141.26(B)(5). Two months of governance lead time inside a twenty-four-month window is not a lot.
Assuming a forum. Where the master policy is a surplus-lines placement, the forum may be split. The Fifth Circuit held in September 2026 that Louisiana law voids the arbitration clause as to domestic insurers on a policy carrying a Contract Allocation Endorsement, while foreign underwriters go to arbitration under the New York Convention — and the case was remanded on whether the litigation should be stayed pending the arbitration. A stay is not a tolling agreement.
And what a board has lost on the remedies side too
Two changes narrow what is recoverable, and both predate this year.
Louisiana repealed one of its two bad-faith statutes outright: R.S. 22:1973 now reads, in full, “§1973. Repealed by Acts 2024, No. 3, §2, eff. July 1, 2024.” R.S. 22:1892 and R.S. 22:1892.2 remain.
And against Louisiana Citizens specifically, 2024 SB 113 barred class actions under both penalty statutes and capped exposure: Citizens “shall not be liable for general damages, special damages, or penalties in excess of the policy's limit; however, this Subsection does not limit the Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation from paying legal interest due from breach or reasonable attorney fees and costs when otherwise provided by this Section.”
What a board can do
- Write the date of loss on the front of the claim file. It is the only date the deadline runs from.
- Log every payment date anyway. They no longer extend anything, but they are what a dispute about the timeline will be reconstructed from — and R.S. 9:1141.36 makes the file an association record.
- Set an internal review at eighteen months. That leaves room for a board meeting on statutory notice and a decision under R.S. 9:1145(E).
- Do not rely on the January 2027 notice duty. It is not addressed to your policy.
What to watch next
January 1, 2027, when the notice duty attaches to homeowners policies. Whether any Louisiana court addresses Act 876's application to losses predating June 9, 2026. And the Law Institute's HOPE Committee, requested by HCR 117 of 2026 to study the Citizens residential claims process — a natural place for someone to point out that the notice duty stops short of association policies.
Related Louisiana HOA Topics
- Bryan v. Louisiana Citizens Property Ins. Corp., No. 2025-C-00443 (La. Mar. 6, 2026) — opinion ↩
- Act No. 876, 2026 Regular Session (HB 1117) — enrolled Act text ↩
- La. R.S. 22:47 — Kinds of insurance defined ↩
- La. R.S. 22:1973 — repealed by Acts 2024, No. 3 ↩
- Transportation Consultants, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, No. 25-30372 (5th Cir. Sept. 3, 2026) ↩
Stay on top of Louisiana HOA law
Every week: new Louisiana legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.