Louisiana HOA Short-Term Rentals
Quick-Reference Table
| # | Mechanic | Condominiums | Planned Communities |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HOA authority over short-term rentals | Yes, through the declaration and bylaws, enforced under the Louisiana Condominium Act1 | Yes, through the declaration operating as a building restriction under the Civil Code and the Louisiana Planned Community Act2 |
| 2 | State short-term rental statute | None (no statewide STR statute; regulation is local) | None (no statewide STR statute; regulation is local) |
| 3 | State preemption of local STR regulation | No. Municipalities regulate under La. R.S. 33:4721; this restrains local governments, not associations3 | No. Municipalities regulate under La. R.S. 33:4721; this restrains local governments, not associations3 |
| 4 | State-law limit on HOA rental restrictions | No (no statute comparable to California Civil Code § 4741 or Arizona A.R.S. § 33-1806.01)1 | No (declaration-driven, subject to the Civil Code building-restriction rules)2 |
| 5 | Condominium statute, rental or use provisions | La. R.S. 9:1121.101 et seq.; use governed by the declaration; amendments under La. R.S. 9:1122.1194 | Not applicable |
| 6 | Planned-community statute, rental or use provisions | Not applicable | La. R.S. 9:1141.1 et seq. (Planned Community Act) together with La. Civ. Code arts. 775–78325 |
| 7 | Minimum lease term defining "short-term" | Not specified by statute; the declaration controls (the 30-day line appears only in tax and local ordinances)6 | Not specified by statute; the declaration controls6 |
| 8 | HOA authority to cap rentals by percentage of units | Not specified by statute; permitted if the declaration authorizes it4 | Not specified by statute; permitted if the community documents authorize it2 |
| 9 | Declaration amendment threshold to add a rental restriction | 67% of association votes unless the declaration specifies another percentage (La. R.S. 9:1122.119)4 | Supermajority (more than 80% of all lot owners) to impose a more burdensome use restriction (La. R.S. 9:1141.14, 9:1141.2); absent a community-document provision, two-thirds of lot owners to make building restrictions more onerous (La. R.S. 9:1141.6)78 |
| 10 | Grandfathering of existing owners | Not required by statute; the declaration controls, subject to liberative prescription (art. 781) and abandonment (art. 782)910 | Existing use protected as a nonconforming use (La. R.S. 9:1141.14); also subject to prescription (art. 781) and abandonment (art. 782). No Florida-style or California-style statutory shield7 |
| 11 | State or local registration or permit | Not required by the state; local permits apply where the local government regulates (New Orleans NSTR/CSTR via the Department of Safety and Permits)11 | Not required by the state; local permits apply where the local government regulates11 |
| 12 | Transient occupancy or lodging tax | Applies. State sales tax, local sales and hotel/occupancy taxes, and New Orleans STR taxes; the taxable threshold is a stay of less than 30 consecutive days612 | Applies on the same basis12 |
| 13 | Notice and hearing required before fining for an STR violation | Yes, notice and an opportunity to be heard (La. R.S. 9:1123.102(11))13 | Notice required (La. R.S. 9:1141.38); the community documents' procedures apply and have the force of law (La. R.S. 9:1141.8)1415 |
| 14 | Enforcement remedies available to the HOA | Fines (La. R.S. 9:1123.102(11)), injunction (La. Civ. Code art. 779), and a privilege on the unit (La. R.S. 9:1123.115)1316 | Fines, injunction (La. Civ. Code art. 779), and the association privilege (La. R.S. 9:1141.9)1617 |
| 15 | Trial court to appellate path | District Courts to the five Courts of Appeal to the Louisiana Supreme Court (discretionary writ); jurisprudence constante, not stare decisis; federal STR challenges run through the Fifth Circuit18 | Same structure18 |
Last verified: July 17, 2026.
Section 1 — Overview: Can an HOA restrict short-term rentals in Louisiana?
A Louisiana condominium association or homeowners association can restrict or prohibit short-term rentals through the declaration, which in a planned community takes effect as a building restriction under the Civil Code, and separately such rentals face heavy local regulation, most intensely in New Orleans. Two statutes supply the association framework: the Louisiana Condominium Act, La. R.S. 9:1121.101 et seq., for condominiums, and the Louisiana Planned Community Act, La. R.S. 9:1141.1 et seq. (renamed from the Louisiana Homeowners Association Act by Acts 2024, No. 158, effective January 1, 2025), for planned communities, the latter operating together with the Civil Code building-restriction articles, La. Civ. Code arts. 775 to 783.119 Louisiana is the country's only civil-law jurisdiction, so what other states call restrictive covenants or CC&Rs are building restrictions here, enforced under civil-law mechanics such as liberative prescription and abandonment rather than common-law covenant doctrine.3 The dominant, heavily litigated regime is New Orleans, and there is no statewide statute preempting local STR regulation. Local permitting and lodging taxes are owner-facing layers that bind owners and local governments; they neither grant nor remove association authority. The sections below set out the legal framework, the operational mechanics of adoption and enforcement, and recent legislative and judicial activity.
Section 2 — The legal framework for HOA short-term rental restrictions
2A. The civil-law foundation and the two statutes
Louisiana property law derives from the Louisiana Civil Code, not English common law, and it has no common law of covenants. Use restrictions in a residential development are building restrictions, defined by La. Civ. Code art. 775 as charges imposed under a general plan governing building standards, specified uses, and improvements.3 Building restrictions are sui generis real rights likened to predial servitudes, and doubt about their existence, validity, or extent is resolved in favor of the unrestricted use of the immovable (art. 783).20 Common-law concepts such as touch and concern, horizontal privity, laches, and adverse possession have no application.
Two statutes overlay this foundation. The Louisiana Condominium Act (La. R.S. 9:1121.101 et seq., enacted by Acts 1979, No. 682) governs condominiums, where authority over use flows from the recorded condominium declaration and bylaws.1 The Louisiana Planned Community Act (La. R.S. 9:1141.1 et seq.) governs planned communities and operates together with the building-restriction articles; art. 783 provides that the Condominium Act, the Timesharing Act, and the Planned Community Act supersede the Civil Code building-restriction articles in the event of a conflict.20 The two association statutes should not be conflated, and their provisions do not cross-apply: a condominium is governed by the Condominium Act, and a planned community by the Planned Community Act plus arts. 775 to 783. In either setting, the declaration is the source of rental authority, and it is important to distinguish authority over long-term leasing from authority over short-term or transient rentals, which Louisiana courts treat as a commercial use rather than a residential lease.21
2B. Restricting rentals, amendments, prescription, and grandfathering
A condominium adds or tightens a rental restriction by amending the declaration. Under La. R.S. 9:1122.119, the declaration may be amended by vote or agreement of unit owners holding at least 67% of the association's votes, or any other percentage the declaration specifies.4 A planned community establishes or amends a building restriction under the Planned Community Act and the Civil Code. Where the community documents do not provide a method, La. R.S. 9:1141.6 sets defaults: building restrictions may be established by three-fourths of the lot owners, made more onerous by two-thirds, and made less onerous or terminated by more than one-half.8 Separately, La. R.S. 9:1141.14 requires a supermajority (more than 80% of all lot owners, not merely those present) to adopt a more burdensome use restriction by declaration amendment, and it bars an amendment from prohibiting an existing use of a lot.7
Two civil-law mechanics bear on enforceability. Liberative prescription under La. Civ. Code art. 781 bars any action for injunction or damages more than two years after the commencement of a noticeable violation, after which the immovable is freed of the restriction that was violated.9 Abandonment under art. 782 terminates a restriction where the whole plan or a particular restriction has been generally abandoned.10 Grandfathering is therefore resolved through these civil-law routes and, for planned communities, through the nonconforming-use protection in La. R.S. 9:1141.14, not through any Florida-style or California-style statutory shield.7 Neither association statute limits an association's authority to restrict rentals; Louisiana is declaration-driven and has no counterpart to California Civil Code § 4741 or Arizona A.R.S. § 33-1806.01.2
2C. State law, New Orleans, tax, and the local layer
There is no statewide statute preempting local STR regulation. Municipalities regulate under their zoning power (La. R.S. 33:4721), and the Fifth Circuit confirmed that this authority reaches the regulation of short-term rentals.18 New Orleans has the most contested regime in the country. In Hignell-Stark v. City of New Orleans, 46 F.4th 317 (5th Cir. 2022), decided August 22, 2022, the court held that the city's requirement tying a residential STR permit to the owner's primary residence and homestead exemption discriminated against out-of-state owners and violated the dormant Commerce Clause.22 The city rewrote its ordinance in 2023, replacing owner residency with an operator-residency rule (a licensed operator on-site while guests are present), capping residential permits at one per city square (four city streets forming a square) awarded by lottery effective July 1, 2023, and later requiring platforms to verify permits.12 On October 7, 2025, the Fifth Circuit issued a second decision (No. 24-30160) striking the ban on business-entity permit holders (Equal Protection) and a one-listing advertising rule, while upholding the operator-residency requirement, the permit scheme, and advertising disclosures.18 Louisiana imposes state sales tax on lodging (5%, raised from 4.45% effective January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2029 by Act 11 of the 2024 Third Extraordinary Session) plus local sales and hotel/occupancy taxes, and New Orleans layers on additional STR taxes (an occupancy tax capped at 6.75% under La. R.S. 47:338.221, plus city STR fees), all keyed to stays of less than 30 consecutive days.623 This local layer governs the owner-to-government relationship only. An owner who holds a valid New Orleans permit may still violate the building restrictions in the declaration, and an owner in compliance with the declaration may still lack a required city permit.
Section 3 — Operational mechanics and enforcement
A. Adopting a valid restriction (the tools)
The most common mechanism is a minimum-lease-term restriction, which in a planned community takes effect as a building restriction and in a condominium as a declaration provision. Louisiana sets no statewide statutory minimum lease term for associations, so the day-count that defines "short-term" comes from the declaration itself; the 30-day line found in tax and local ordinances does not bind associations.6 Rental caps by percentage of units are likewise not addressed by either statute and depend on express authority in the declaration or community documents, adopted through the amendment thresholds in Section 2B (67% for condominiums under La. R.S. 9:1122.119; a more-than-80% supermajority for a more burdensome planned-community use restriction under La. R.S. 9:1141.14).47 An association may also impose internal registration, owner-information, and lease-filing requirements; the Planned Community Act expressly allows an association to require an occupant to execute and file documentation.2
B. Enforcement
Before fining, a condominium association must provide notice and an opportunity to be heard under La. R.S. 9:1123.102(11), which authorizes reasonable fines for violations of the declaration, bylaws, and rules and is expressly subject to the declaration.13 In a planned community, the community documents' procedures apply and have the force of law under La. R.S. 9:1141.8, and the Planned Community Act sets notice methods (mail, electronic mail, hand delivery, or another reasonable method) under La. R.S. 9:1141.38.1415 The liberative-prescription period of La. Civ. Code art. 781 is the sharpest practical constraint: an association that lets a noticeable STR violation run for two years loses the right to enjoin it or recover damages, and the property is freed of the restriction that was violated.9 Remedies include fines, injunctive relief (building restrictions may be enforced by mandatory and prohibitory injunctions under La. Civ. Code art. 779, without regard to the ordinary injunction limits), and enforcement of unpaid amounts as a privilege on the unit or lot (La. R.S. 9:1123.115 for condominiums; La. R.S. 9:1141.9 for planned communities).1617 Association enforcement runs on a separate track from local-government enforcement: the city can fine an owner for permit violations while the association separately enjoins the same conduct as a building-restriction breach, and neither displaces the other. Most of these rules are declaration-driven; the statutory fine and notice provisions may be supplemented or made stricter by the governing documents.
Section 4 — Recent legislative and judicial activity
A. Recent bills
Act 158 (SB 23) · 2024 Regular Session
Act 158 of the 2024 Regular Session created the Louisiana Planned Community Act, replacing the nine-section Homeowners Association Act (La. R.S. 9:1141.1–1141.9) with a 50-section framework (La. R.S. 9:1141.1 through 1141.50) modeled on the 2008 Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act, and it amended La. Civ. Code art. 783 to reference the new Act; it is prospective, applying to associations formed on or after the effective date, with its default rules filling gaps left by existing community documents.[19]
| Property managers | Newly formed planned communities operate under detailed budget, records, meeting, and voting rules, so onboarding checklists must be rebuilt around La. R.S. 9:1141. |
| Condominium and HOA board members | Boards of new planned communities cannot amend the declaration or terminate the community, and a more burdensome use restriction now needs a supermajority of all lot owners. |
| Community association attorneys | Drafters must align declarations with the Act's suppletive rules or risk default provisions overriding developer intent. |
| Homeowners | Existing uses are protected as nonconforming, so an owner already renting short-term when a stricter rule passes may continue that use within the Act's limits. |
Act 387 (HB 610) · 2025 Regular Session
Act 387 of the 2025 Regular Session concerns New Orleans short-term rentals and requires online platforms to give renters a line-by-line itemization of all assessments, fees, and taxes owed; the statutory occupancy-tax cap in La. R.S. 47:338.221 remained at 6.75%.[24]
| Property managers | Platform bookings for New Orleans units must display itemized taxes and fees, adding a disclosure checkpoint. |
| Condominium and HOA board members | The Act touches owner-to-government tax mechanics, not association authority, so board powers are unchanged. |
| Community association attorneys | Advise owner-clients that the change is a tax-transparency measure, not a grant of new rental rights. |
| Homeowners | Short-term renters in New Orleans should see clearer itemized charges at booking. |
B. Recent rulings
Hignell-Stark v. City of New Orleans
In Hignell-Stark v. City of New Orleans, No. 24-30160, the Fifth Circuit struck the city's ban on business-entity permit holders (Equal Protection) and a one-listing advertising rule (First Amendment), while affirming the operator-residency requirement, separate owner and operator permits, and advertising disclosures, and reaffirming that operating a short-term rental is a commercial privilege, not a right.[18]
| Property managers | LLC and corporate owners may hold New Orleans permits, but the one-per-square cap and operator-on-site rule still constrain operations. |
| Condominium and HOA board members | The ruling addresses city permitting only; a board's authority to bar STRs through the declaration is unaffected. |
| Community association attorneys | The decision confirms STRs are a commercial use under Louisiana law, which supports enforcing "residential use only" building restrictions. |
| Homeowners | A city permit does not immunize an owner from a declaration that prohibits transient rentals. |
Deslonde v. St. Tammany Parish
In Deslonde v. St. Tammany Parish, 2023 CA 0948, 391 So.3d 706, the First Circuit affirmed judgment for the parish, holding that operating a short-term rental is a strictly commercial use prohibited in a single-family residential zoning district and rejecting the owners' nonconforming-use, vagueness, and constitutional claims.[25]
| Property managers | In parishes that zone against STRs in residential districts, a residential-zone unit may be ineligible regardless of any permit application. |
| Condominium and HOA board members | The "strictly commercial use" characterization strengthens reliance on residential-use building restrictions to bar STRs. |
| Community association attorneys | Deslonde is a parish-zoning decision, not an association case, but its commercial-use holding is persuasive for building-restriction enforcement. |
| Homeowners | Owners in residentially zoned areas should confirm both zoning eligibility and declaration limits before listing. |
C. Active legislative or local debates
State proposals to regulate unlicensed STRs statewide and to create a neighbor right of action (for example, SB 225 of the 2025 session) have been discussed but not confirmed as enacted, and New Orleans continues to adjust its ordinance, including the March 2025 City Council elimination of permit exceptions and phased platform-verification enforcement.
Section 5 — National positioning and related coverage
Louisiana is the country's only civil-law jurisdiction, so association use restrictions are building restrictions under the Louisiana Civil Code (arts. 775 to 783) rather than common-law covenants, and they are administered through two separate statutes, the Louisiana Condominium Act and the Louisiana Planned Community Act, against the backdrop of a dominant, heavily litigated New Orleans STR regime. This sets Louisiana apart from states that preempt local bans (such as Florida and Arizona) or that limit HOA rental authority directly by statute (such as California and Arizona); Louisiana does neither, leaving rental authority to the declaration and the civil-law enforcement rules of prescription and abandonment. Local STR permitting and lodging taxes restrain local governments and owners, not associations, so satisfying a city permit is not a defense to a building-restriction violation. For a multi-state operator entering Louisiana, the practical implications are three: use building restrictions and the declaration rather than common-law covenant theories, keep the two statutes distinct and never cross-apply them, and treat the New Orleans regime as a separate owner-facing compliance layer.
HOA Weekly's Louisiana Short-Term Rentals coverage updates quarterly as the Legislature, the Louisiana Courts of Appeal and Supreme Court, the Fifth Circuit, and local governments act. Federal frameworks (the FHA, ADA, FDCPA, SCRA, and OTARD rule) also apply to Louisiana associations regardless of the state framework.
Footnotes
- Louisiana Condominium Act, La. R.S. 9:1121.101 et seq. (Acts 1979, No. 682), Louisiana State Legislature ↩
- Louisiana Planned Community Act, La. R.S. 9:1141.1 et seq., Louisiana State Legislature ↩
- La. Civ. Code arts. 775–783, Building Restrictions (LSU Law Center, Louisiana Civil Code) ↩
- La. R.S. 9:1141.1 et seq., together with La. Civ. Code arts. 775–783 ↩
- La. Civ. Code art. 781, Termination; liberative prescription (two years from commencement of a noticeable violation) ↩
- La. Civ. Code art. 782, Abandonment of plan or of restriction ↩
- La. Civ. Code art. 783, Matters of interpretation and application (as amended by Acts 2024, No. 158) ↩
- La. Civ. Code art. 779, enforcement by mandatory and prohibitory injunctions ↩
- La. R.S. 9:1122.119, Amendment of declaration (at least 67% of association votes) ↩
- La. R.S. 9:1123.102(11), Powers of unit owners' association (fines after notice and an opportunity to be heard) ↩
- La. R.S. 9:1141.6, Establishment, amendment, or termination of building restrictions ↩
- La. R.S. 9:1141.14 and 9:1141.2 (supermajority; nonconforming use), Acts 2024, No. 158 ↩
- La. R.S. 9:1141.8, Community documents; force of law ↩
- La. R.S. 9:1141.9, Homeowners association privilege ↩
- La. R.S. 9:1141.38, notice methods, Acts 2024, No. 158 ↩
- Acts 2024, No. 158 (SB 23), Louisiana Planned Community Act, effective January 1, 2025 ↩
- Hignell-Stark v. City of New Orleans, 46 F.4th 317 (5th Cir. 2022) (discussed in No. 24-30160) ↩
- Hignell-Stark v. City of New Orleans, No. 24-30160 (5th Cir. Oct. 7, 2025); La. R.S. 33:4721 municipal zoning authority ↩
- Edwards v. Landry Chalet Rentals, LLC, 51,883 (La. App. 2 Cir. 02/28/18), 246 So. 3d 754, writ denied, 2018-0502 (La. 06/01/18), 244 So. 3d 437 ↩
- Deslonde v. St. Tammany Parish, 2023 CA 0948 (La. App. 1 Cir. 06/04/24), 391 So. 3d 706 ↩
- City of New Orleans, Short Term Rental Administration (Department of Safety and Permits) ↩
- City of New Orleans, STR Taxes, Fees, and Fines; residential permit density (one per city square, lottery, effective July 1, 2023) ↩
- La. R.S. 47:338.221, City of New Orleans short-term rental occupancy tax (cap 6.75%; less than 30 consecutive days) ↩
- Louisiana Department of Revenue, state sales tax on sleeping rooms and accommodations (5% effective January 1, 2025, per Act 11 of the 2024 Third Extraordinary Session) ↩
- Acts 2025, No. 387 (HB 610), New Orleans short-term rentals, effective January 1, 2026 ↩