Santa Fe County capped rentals by community — then started filing criminal charges
Santa Fe County capped rentals by community — then started filing criminal charges
2026-09-15 · New Mexico · Regulation
Santa Fe County limits non-owner-occupied short-term rentals by percentage of each community's housing stock, and in 2025 it began prosecuting violations as petty misdemeanours.1
The ordinance and the caps
Ordinance 2022-07, the Short-Term Rental Regulation, Registration, and Licensing Ordinance, was adopted October 25, 2022 and took effect November 24, 2022, with the registration and licensing requirement phased in to March 15, 2023. It carried a one-year moratorium on new non-owner-occupied licences for property acquired after November 25, 2022, while the Board studied “the impact they may have on affordable housing supply, areas where they conflict with primary residential uses.”
The amendment that produced the caps was approved on a 4–1 vote in January 2024 and took effect February 9, 2024. It limits non-owner-occupied short-term rentals in roughly 35 census-designated communities to 3 percent or 7 percent of that community's housing stock, depending on existing rental numbers and the community's character, and limits a single person, married couple or entity to two non-owner-occupied rentals. Owner-occupied short-term rentals are not numerically capped.
Enforcement escalated in 2025
The County added three code enforcement officers for short-term rental enforcement in 2025. Reporting indicates at least fifteen people faced petty misdemeanour charges from July of that year. Every criminal case filed by a code enforcement officer was dismissed once the owner came into compliance — none went to trial or produced a conviction — but several produced arrest warrants for owners, including out-of-state owners, who missed arraignment.
What a percentage cap does to a covenant fight
A public cap set below existing supply turns a permit into a scarce asset attached to a particular lot. That changes the economics of every covenant dispute inside a capped community, and the mechanism is worth knowing before a board meets it.
The stakes go up. An owner whose short-term rental permit is effectively unobtainable if surrendered will fight an association's enforcement action far harder than an owner who can simply reapply. The permit has value independent of the rental income.
Waiver arguments get stronger. As the permit becomes more valuable, so does the incentive to argue that the association has abandoned or waived its use restriction through years of non-enforcement. A board that has never enforced a “residential use only” clause against a short-term rental, in a community where several have operated openly, is in a weaker position than it believes.
Enforcement has to be community-wide. Picking off one unit is the approach most likely to produce a selective-enforcement defence, and least likely to change anything, since the cap means another owner simply takes the freed capacity.
The criminal turn, and why it reaches the association
It is now possible for an owner inside a Santa Fe County community to acquire a bench warrant over a rental the association separately prohibits. That is not merely a neighbour problem. It touches insurance questions, it appears in the kind of background checks that lenders and purchasers run, and it changes the tenor of an enforcement conversation that a board may have been treating as a civil disagreement.
The same model elsewhere in northern New Mexico
Taos County adopted its own short-term rental ordinance in August 2024, capping permits for the unincorporated county at 400, with exemptions for several categories — a cap set below the number of existing rentals officials expected to be eligible, so it bound immediately. The Town of Taos has a separate cap of 120 permits town-wide, adopted in 2022 and later amended.
The dynamic is identical: where the public cap sits below supply, the permit becomes scarce, and associations in those communities should expect owners to litigate any covenant reading that would strand one.
What a board in a capped community should establish
Whether the declaration actually prohibits the use, in language that reaches a nightly rental rather than merely describing residential use. Whether the association has enforced it, consistently, and what record exists of that. How many units in the community hold county permits — a question the county's licensing records can answer. And whether the board intends to enforce at all, because in a capped community the decision not to decide is itself a decision, and it accumulates into a waiver argument.
Related New Mexico HOA Topics
Stay on top of New Mexico HOA law
Every week: new New Mexico legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.