Residents would get 90 days to buy their park
Residents would get 90 days to buy their park
2026-09-15 · Pennsylvania · Legislation · Pending — not yet law
What would happen. SB 746 would give the residents of a Pennsylvania manufactured-home community the right to make a competing offer when the community is put up for sale. It is not law — but it is the furthest advanced of any bill in this field, having been reported as amended from committee 11-0 on 8 June 2026 and re-referred to Senate Appropriations on 30 June 2026.1
What the bill requires
A new § 11.4 of the Manufactured Home Community Rights Act. The notification duty, verbatim:
"When a manufactured home community owner markets or offers the community for sale, or receives a bona fide purchase offer that the community owner intends to accept or counter, the community owner shall notify prospective purchasers that the sale, acceptance or counteroffer is subject to the residents' right to purchase the community under this section."2
Ninety days' written notice by certified mail must go to each resident, the resident association, the Department of Community and Economic Development, the local housing authority and the municipality. The notice "shall specify the price, terms and conditions of the proposed sale and state that residents have 90 days to submit a competing offer."
Who may exercise it
A resident association or a nonprofit representing at least 25% of the spaces. And there is an anti-evasion clause: sale agreements "shall not include terms that favor a nonresident purchaser or impose penalties on the community owner for complying."2
The amendment worth noting
The committee amendment, A03471, adopted 7-4 before the bill was reported 11-0, changed the state agency receiving notice from the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency to the Department of Community and Economic Development — the strike-through is visible in the amended printer's number.
That is not housekeeping. PHFA is the Commonwealth's housing finance body, with the capacity to help a resident group actually raise money. DCED is an economic-development department. Moving the notice from the financier to the administrator changes who is positioned to help residents act on the right.
Why a right of first refusal is the intervention that works
Because it addresses the structural problem rather than its symptom. A rent cap constrains what an owner may charge; a purchase right changes who the owner is.
The recurring Pennsylvania fact pattern — an out-of-state buyer acquires a community, raises lot rents, reduces on-site management — turns on a transaction the residents learn about after it has closed. A notification duty plus a competing-offer window inserts the people with the most at stake into a process they are currently absent from.
It is also the version of the agenda with the broader political coalition, which is visible in the numbers. The amendment passed 7-4 and the bill was then reported 11-0. Its co-sponsors include Republicans Baker, Pennycuick, Vogel, Gebhard, Malone and Mastriano alongside Democrats Costa, Saval, Kearney and Kane. A unanimous committee report on a housing bill in Pennsylvania is unusual.
The contrast with its own package
SB 746 was introduced as part of Sen. Judith Schwank's "Manufactured Homeowner Equity Preservation Package," alongside SB 745. Both were introduced on 3 June 2025 and referred to the same committee on the same day.
SB 746 — the purchase right — was amended, reported 11-0, given first and second consideration, and sent to Appropriations.
SB 745 — which covers resident associations, fee disclosure and rent-increase limits — has had no action at all.3
Same sponsor, same committee, same day, same package. One moved unanimously and one did not move at all. That split is the clearest available statement of what the Pennsylvania Senate is prepared to do in this area: it will give residents a chance to buy, and it will not tell an owner what to charge.
What Appropriations means
It is the last procedural stop before a Senate floor vote, and it is a fiscal review rather than a policy one. A bill in Appropriations has cleared its policy committee and is being costed.
What the Commonwealth would actually spend here is modest — the duties created fall on community owners, with DCED receiving notices. The harder question the fiscal review raises is the one the amendment already touched: if residents are to exercise a 90-day purchase right, someone has to finance a multi-million-dollar acquisition in 90 days, and the bill as amended routes the notice away from the agency that finances housing.
The practical limits to understand
Three, and they matter for anyone reading this as a solution:
- Ninety days is short for an acquisition. Organising residents, forming an entity, conducting diligence and securing financing on a community sale inside three months is demanding even with professional support.
- Twenty-five percent of spaces is a real threshold. In a community where residents are elderly, dispersed or unorganised, assembling that participation is itself the obstacle — which is exactly why HB 1250's separate guarantee of the right to form an association and meet on site is a precondition for this right being usable.
- A competing offer is not a right to buy at a discount. The residents must compete on the stated price, terms and conditions.
The related bill on closures
A parallel measure addresses the other way a community ends. HB 843 would amend MHCRA § 11.2 on closures, requiring notice to residents, the resident association, PHFA and the municipality "within 60 days of deciding to close the community[.], at least 120 days prior to the discontinuance of the use of the land as a manufactured home community or the proposed closing upon the sale …, whichever is earlier. The notice shall include the estimated date residents and tenants will be expected to vacate the community, which shall be no less than 180 days from the date of the notice."4 It would also extend the purchase right to a resident association "notwithstanding if the association is formally recognized."
HB 843 was referred to the House Housing and Community Development Committee on 10 March 2025 and has had no action.
What to watch next
Whether Senate Appropriations reports SB 746 before the session ends on 30 November 2026. If it does and the Senate passes it, the bill still needs House action and a signature inside the remaining session days. If it does not, the furthest-advanced manufactured-housing bill in fifteen years dies with everything else and restarts in 2027-2028.
Related Pennsylvania HOA Topics
- SB 746, 2025-2026 session — bill history (reported as amended 11-0, 8 June 2026) ↩
- SB 746, Printer’s No. 1793 — bill text as amended (proposed MHCRA § 11.4) ↩
- SB 745, 2025-2026 session — the package partner with no recorded action ↩
- HB 843, Printer’s No. 873 — community closure notice requirements ↩
Stay on top of Pennsylvania HOA law
Every week: new Pennsylvania legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.