We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Sturgis made Rally camping a by-right use in residential yards

South Dakota · Regulation

Sturgis made Rally camping a by-right use in residential yards

Sturgis has legalised what a great many of its residents were already doing during Rally week, and set the floor above what many covenants allow.

Ordinance 2026-03, Temporary Residential Rally Camping, was adopted on second reading at the May 4, 2026 council meeting after drafts through February, March and April. It “repeals and replaces Chapter 91” in its entirety and was reported effective June 11, 2026. The staff report was prepared by City Attorney Eric Davis and approved by City Administrator Aaron Jordan on April 29, 2026.1

City officials' stated reason for the rewrite is worth recording: the old code was too restrictive for Rally season and, in practice, had been selectively enforced.

The by-right allowance

“§ 91.07 BY-RIGHT RALLY RESIDENTIAL CAMPING. . . . By-right Rally camping shall not exceed, at any given time: Three (3) camping units and Ten (10) campers.”

No permit, no application, no fee. Above that level a permit is required, and the ordinance is candid about how light a control that is: “The permit fee shall be zero dollars ($0.00). No universal ordinance-wide maximum number of camping units or individual campers is established for Rally camping authorized by permit under this section.” Permit applications are due June 15.

The window got longer

The definition as presented for second reading carries its own redline, showing the April council direction:

“RALLY WINDOW. The official dates of the annual Sturgis Motorcycle Rally as set by the Common Council, plus the seven (7) calendar days immediately preceding and the three (3) calendar days immediately following those official dates.”

Three days before became seven. The camping season around the Rally is now a fortnight and a half.

✓ Your South Dakota State Pass is active — the full analysis below is unlocked

Outside the Rally window, the rules are strict

Non-Rally camping is capped at “Three (3) camping units… Ten (10) campers… and Seven (7) calendar days per year” under § 91.06(D), and it must be non-commercial:

“No fee, rent, charge, donation, contribution, or other consideration may be required or accepted.”

It also may not be publicly advertised. So the ordinance draws a sharp seasonal line: a commercial free-for-all inside the Rally window, and a strictly non-commercial seven days for the rest of the year.

Eligibility keys to an “OWNER-OCCUPIED RESIDENTIAL DWELLING… receiving the owner-occupied tax designation by Meade County” — which ties a zoning privilege to a property tax classification, and means an investor-owned house in a Sturgis subdivision cannot host by right.

What it does to a covenant

Nothing directly, and the ordinance says as much: “Nothing in this chapter authorizes nuisance conduct, conduct prohibited by other City ordinances or state law.” A city cannot repeal a recorded restriction by ordinance, and this one does not try.

What it removes is the city as an ally. A Sturgis-area association enforcing a no-recreational-vehicle, no-transient-occupancy or residential-use-only covenant is now enforcing against conduct the city expressly permits without paperwork. The owner's answer — “the city allows this” — is no defence to a covenant, but it changes the temperature of every conversation.

And there is a sharper risk in the background. In Hood v. Straatmeyer, the South Dakota Supreme Court affirmed the cancellation of an entire subdivision's covenants where violations were widespread and unchallenged. An association that watches campers appear on lot after lot for a fortnight each August without acting is accumulating exactly the record that case turns on. The city's own staff described the prior regime as selectively enforced; selective enforcement is the phrase at the centre of Hood.

The wider Black Hills picture

The Rally reaches well beyond Sturgis, and the surrounding jurisdictions have gone in different directions.

Deadwood prohibits transient commercial use of residential property outright, with one carve-out that is itself Rally-shaped: the ban does not apply for “a period of fourteen (14) days or less during the month of August, commencing four days immediately preceding the official start of the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally and ending three days after the end of the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally each year.”2

Rapid City, by contrast, now permits vacation homes by right in low-density residential districts at five bedrooms or fewer. Spearfish states it “does not currently regulate short-term rentals” at all.

Four Black Hills jurisdictions, four regimes. Our short-term rentals page covers how a residential-use covenant reads against transient occupancy in the first place, which is the question that survives whichever city a community sits in.

What to watch next

The first Rally under the new ordinance has now passed. The figures worth following are the permit count above the by-right threshold — free permits produce data, and that data is public — and whether the city's nuisance provisions get used at all, since the ordinance leans on them as the only backstop on by-right camping.

Related South Dakota HOA Topics

← All South Dakota HOA Topics

  1. City of Sturgis, Ordinance 2026-03, Temporary Residential Rally Camping — staff report and ordinance text for second reading ↩
  2. City of Deadwood, Short-Term Rental Information (ch. 17.53, Transient Commercial Use of Property—Prohibited) ↩
  3. City of Spearfish, Short-Term Rentals page ↩

Stay on top of South Dakota HOA law

Every week: new South Dakota legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.