Short-Term Rental Rules Checker
The state-law layer of the short-term rental question: what associations may restrict, how bans happen, and who gets grandfathered.
Three layers decide whether a home in an association can operate as a short-term rental: state statute, the governing documents, and local ordinance. The layers get conflated constantly, and the most expensive confusion is the first one; several states limit what CITIES may do about short-term rentals while leaving associations entirely free to restrict them. This checker reports the state-statute layer for any state and the District of Columbia: whether statute limits association restrictions, whether a ban requires amending the declaration, how existing owners are treated when restrictions arrive, the vote threshold an amendment needs, and any statutory minimum lease terms. Every answer links to the official text. City and county ordinances sit outside this checker by design; a rental that clears the association may still need a local permit.
The summary table below covers every jurisdiction; the interactive checker needs JavaScript.
Association STR authority at a glance: all 51 jurisdictions
The table reports whether state statute limits association restrictions. The checker above adds ban mechanics, grandfathering, thresholds, and the exact statutory text.
| Jurisdiction | State limit on association (HOA) | Association may restrict | Amendment threshold | Condominiums | Key citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | no statutory limit | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Ala. Code § 35-20-8 |
| Alaska | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | same rules | AS 34.08.250(d) |
| Arizona | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | A.R.S. § 33-1806.01(C) |
| Arkansas | no statutory limit | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | AR 2025 Reg. Sess. HB1790 |
| California | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | same rules | Cal. Civ. Code § 4740(a) |
| Colorado | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | same rules | C.R.S. § 38-33.3-217(4.5) |
| Connecticut | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | same rules | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-236(f) |
| Delaware | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | 25 Del. C. § 81-217(a) |
| District of Columbia | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | unsettled | declaration controls | differs; see checker | D.C. Code tit. 42, chs. 1-40 (table of contents) |
| Florida | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Fla. Stat. § 720.306(1)(h)1 |
| Georgia | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | O.C.G.A. § 44-3-223 |
| Hawaii | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | § 46-4(a) |
| Idaho | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Idaho Code § 55-3211 |
| Illinois | no statutory limit | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | 765 ILCS 160/1-20(a) |
| Indiana | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Ind. Code § 32-25.5-3-11(d) |
| Iowa | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Iowa Code § 614.24(1) |
| Kansas | no statutory limit | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | No. 126,318 (Kan. Ct. App. May 31, 2024) (unpublished) |
| Kentucky | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | KRS 381.785(9) |
| Louisiana | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | La. R.S. § 9:1141.1 |
| Maine | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | 33 M.R.S. § 1601-102(a) |
| Maryland | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | Md. Code Ann., Real Prop. § 11B-116(a)(2) |
| Massachusetts | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 64G, § 15 |
| Michigan | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | MCL 450.2231(2) |
| Minnesota | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | Minn. Stat. § 515B.3-102(a)(11) (current text, pre-2027) |
| Mississippi | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | S.B. 2693, 2019 Reg. Sess. (Miss.), died in committee 2019-02-05 per official history record |
| Missouri | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | § 442.404.2(1) |
| Montana | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Mont. Code Ann. § 70-17-901(1)(a) |
| Nebraska | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Neb. Rev. Stat. §18-1758(2) |
| Nevada | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | NRS 116.335(1) |
| New Hampshire | no statutory limit | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | RSA 292:8-m, I |
| New Jersey | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | N.J.S.A. 45:22A-44(a) |
| New Mexico | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | House Memorial 52, 57th Leg., 1st Sess. (2025); work group report filed Dec. 2025 |
| New York | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | N-PCL § 202(a)(13) |
| North Carolina | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | N.C. Gen. Stat. § 47F-3-102(1),(6) |
| North Dakota | no statutory limit | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | N.D. Cent. Code § 47-04-24 |
| Ohio | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | Ohio Rev. Code § 5312.13 |
| Oklahoma | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | 60 O.S. § 854 |
| Oregon | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | ORS 94.630(1), (1)(a) |
| Pennsylvania | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | Staff Study, March 2025, "Planned Communities" section |
| Rhode Island | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-63.1-14(a) |
| South Carolina | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | S.C. Code Section 27-30-130(B)(1)(a) |
| South Dakota | no statutory limit | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | SDCL § 11-5-1 |
| Tennessee | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Tenn. Code § 13-7-605(1) |
| Texas | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | § 209.016(d) |
| Utah | yes | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | Utah Code § 57-8a-209(1)(a)-(b) |
| Vermont | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | 27A V.S.A. § 3-102(a)(15) |
| Virginia | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | Va. Code § 55.1-1806(A) |
| Washington | yes (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | RCW 64.38.170 |
| West Virginia | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | statutory | differs; see checker | W. Va. Code § 36B-1-106(c) |
| Wisconsin | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Wis. Stat. § 66.1014(1)(a) |
| Wyoming | no statutory limit (city law differs; see checker) | yes, within limits | declaration controls | differs; see checker | Wyo. Stat. § 17-19-302(a)(iii) |
Source: state statutes as verified for the HOAWeekly Short-Term Rental Rules Checker, updated 2026-07-02. The checker above adds ban mechanics, grandfathering triggers, lease-term rules, and the full citations.
Questions this checker answers
Can an HOA ban Airbnb?
In most states, yes, through the governing documents, and usually by amending the declaration. 20 jurisdictions impose statutory limits on association rental restrictions. The checker reports whether a limit exists and how a ban would have to happen.
My state passed a law protecting short-term rentals. Does it bind the HOA?
Check who the law binds. Several states restrict what cities and counties may do about short-term rentals without touching associations, and the difference decides the case. The checker quotes the operative text so the scope is visible.
What happens to owners already renting when a ban passes?
Some states grandfather existing owners or existing rental use by statute; elsewhere the amendment's own terms and general law decide. The checker reports the statutory rule and its trigger where one exists.
Methodology
Each state entry is built from the operative statutes. Entries quote the statutory text and link to the official legislature or code site. A second, independent review pass checks every entry against the official text before publication, and each entry displays its verification date. The checker runs entirely in the browser; it sets no cookies, saves no entries, and sends nothing to any server.
This checker reports the state-statute layer only. The governing documents of a specific community and city or county ordinances add their own rules, and either can be stricter than state law. It is not legal advice. A buyer counting on rental income, or a board weighing a restriction, should confirm all three layers or speak with a licensed attorney in that state.