Utah has the country’s highest insurance nonrenewal rate
Utah has the country’s highest insurance nonrenewal rate
2026-09-19 · Utah · Compliance · Reported — unconfirmed
Reported, and the underlying dataset has not been published: about 4.5% of Utah homeowners policies were not renewed in 2025 — roughly one in twenty, said to be the highest rate in the country and more than double Utah's own 1.73% the year before.
The figures were reported in September 2026 in a public-radio piece carried by several Mountain West stations, citing a former state insurance regulator now at UC Berkeley.1 Utah has no FAIR plan — no state-organised residual market — so an owner dropped by a carrier falls to surplus-line coverage, described in that reporting as pricier, thinner, and subject to mid-year cancellation. The same piece put the share of Utah homes carrying no insurance at all at 11.3%.
Why this reaches an association and not just a household
A community association's master policy is written in the same market. Section 57-8a-403(1) requires an association to maintain, “to the extent reasonably available,” blanket property insurance or guaranteed replacement cost insurance on attached dwellings, appurtenant limited common areas and common areas, plus liability insurance. Section 57-8a-405(2) sets the floor at “not…less than 100% of the full replacement cost of the insured property” at purchase and at each renewal.
“To the extent reasonably available” is the phrase carrying the weight in a hardening market, and the section requires notice to owners when the insurance is not reasonably available.
The deductible is an owner's problem by statute
The part of this that lands directly on a household is the deductible allocation. Section 57-8a-405(6):
“If a loss occurs that is covered by a property insurance policy in the name of an association and another…in the name of a lot owner: (a) the association's policy provides primary insurance coverage; and (b)…(i) the lot owner is responsible for the association's policy deductible; and (ii) building property coverage…of the lot owner's policy applies to that portion of the loss attributable to the association's policy deductible.”
When a carrier responds to wildfire exposure by raising a master-policy deductible, the increase does not sit with the association. It sits with whichever owner has the loss. Section 57-8a-405(7)(b) allocates it across several damaged units by lot damage percentage, and (8) requires the association to set aside an amount equal to the deductible, or at least $10,000 where it exceeds that. Our Utah insurance requirements page sets out the mechanics.
The new wildfire regime underneath it
House Bill 48, effective January 1, 2026, built a statewide wildland-urban interface risk map at the Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands using a structure exposure score, with a score of 7 or above marking a high-risk WUI property.2 It attached an annual per-structure fee of $20 to $100 for 2026–27 based on square footage, collected through the county property tax bill, with a vegetation-and-materials triage assessment folding into the figure from 2028 and reductions available for mitigation work.
Local reporting in December 2025 named North Summit, Park City and South Summit among the affected fire districts, with the Wasatch Back expected to be classified WUI more or less entirely — and recorded the Park City fire chief saying, three weeks before the law took effect, that the district had still not seen the administrative rules implementing it.3
The rule that followed
The Utah Insurance Department made rule R590-291, “Use of Fire Hazard Data in Rating and Underwriting,” filed October 22, 2025. Its stated purpose:4
“The purpose of this rule is to identify the circumstances under which a property and casualty insurer may use fire hazard data other than the wildfire risk assessment mapping tool maintained by the Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands.”
An insurer writing in the designated high-risk WUI boundary has to show that its use of additional fire hazard data complies with the state's own map. The department delayed the effective date from January 1 to July 1, 2026 — in its own words, “to give insurers more time to comply” — and exempted inland marine and surplus lines insurers.
That last exemption is the one to sit with. Surplus lines is where nonrenewed owners end up, and the rule does not reach it.
The covenant collision, which the legislature has already addressed
House Bill 215 of the 2026 session bars an association rule from stopping an owner in a designated WUI area removing vegetation required for defensible space under the adopted International Wildland Urban Interface Code.5 Utah resolved that conflict before most boards had encountered it. Our Utah water conservation page sets out how the landscaping limits fit together.
What to watch next
The Business and Labor Interim Committee's approved 2026 study items include homeowners' insurance, with the instruction to “consider proposals to address wildfire-related cost increases, such as creating state-supported high-risk pooled insurance or establishing a home mitigation grant program.”6 That is the committee naming the FAIR-plan question directly, ahead of the January 2027 session.
Related Utah HOA Topics
- Utah homeowners, insurance, wildfires and climate change, Wyoming Public Media (Sept. 17, 2026) ↩
- Wildland-urban interface risk, Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands ↩
- New wildfire preparedness law affecting Wasatch Back homeowners takes effect Jan. 1, Park Record (Dec. 16, 2025) ↩
- Rule filing, R590-291, Use of Fire Hazard Data in Rating and Underwriting, Utah Insurance Department (Oct. 22, 2025) ↩
- H.B. 215, Landscaping Restrictions Amendments, 2026 General Session (enrolled copy) ↩
- Approved 2026 interim study items, Utah Legislature ↩
Stay on top of Utah HOA law
Every week: new Utah legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.