We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Fannie Mae retired Limited Review — and Alabama condo boards are now the ones being examined

Fannie Mae retired Limited Review — and Alabama condo boards are now the ones being examined
Alabama · Compliance

Fannie Mae retired Limited Review — and Alabama condo boards are now the ones being examined

The quiet route through condominium project eligibility is gone. For Alabama associations, that means a lender question that used to be answered from a two-page form is now answered from the association's actual documents.

Fannie Mae's Selling Guide section on project standards, B4-2.1-01, in the version dated August 5, 2026, contains no Limited Review pathway at all.1 Limited Review was retired for loan applications dated on or after August 3, 2026.

What remains are four routes: a project-eligibility waiver, Full Review through Condo Project Manager, Fannie Mae Review through PERS, or FHA approval.

Why this reaches the board and not just the buyer

Limited Review existed to let a lender approve a well-collateralised loan in an established project without examining the project itself. Under a Full Review, the lender examines the project — and the project's paperwork comes from the association.

That means budgets, reserve figures, the master insurance certificate, litigation disclosures, owner-occupancy and delinquency percentages, and the answers on a lender questionnaire signed by someone at the association or its management company. A Full Review is an audit of the association conducted through the buyer's mortgage file.

The insurance requirement it runs into

The parallel change is in B7-3-03, master property insurance requirements for project developments, also dated August 5, 2026.2 It requires:

  • coverage of at least 100% of the estimated replacement cost value of the project improvements, “including common elements and residential structures”;
  • a deductible no greater than 5% of the master policy coverage amount per occurrence;
  • a deductible no greater than $50,000 per unit, with a per-unit deductible triggering a unit-owner policy requirement; and
  • windstorm among the required perils, “including named storms designated by the U.S. National Weather Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration by a name or number.”

On the Alabama coast those numbers collide with the market. Named-storm deductibles well above 5% are ordinary on Gulf-front buildings, and the state's residual wind market does not write blanket coverage or multi-building schedules at all.

✓ Your Alabama State Pass is active — the full analysis below is unlocked

What it changes for boards and managers

The practical shift is that a board's document housekeeping is now directly connected to whether units in its building can be financed.

The master policy is the first thing to check, not the last. If the deductible exceeds 5% of the coverage amount, or exceeds $50,000 per unit, the project has an eligibility problem that no amount of buyer creditworthiness fixes. That is a renewal-negotiation issue, and it needs to be raised with the broker before renewal rather than discovered when a sale falls through.

Replacement cost, not actual cash value. The standard is 100% of estimated replacement cost value including common elements. An association carrying ACV coverage, or coverage set below full replacement cost to hold the premium down, is outside it.

Somebody has to own the lender questionnaire. Under Limited Review these arrived rarely. Under Full Review they arrive with every conforming purchase in the building. An association without a designated person, a current budget, and a standing set of answers will become the slow step in its own owners' sales.

Expect the questions to be answered honestly. A questionnaire is a representation. Understating delinquencies or omitting pending litigation to keep a project eligible is not a shortcut worth taking, and the board member signing it is the one making the statement.

Why this bites harder in Alabama

Alabama has no statutory reserve requirement and no structural-inspection mandate. Neither the Uniform Condominium Act of 1991 nor the Homeowners' Association Act requires a reserve study, sets a minimum reserve balance, or imposes a milestone inspection schedule; § 35-8A-307 creates a general duty to maintain, repair and replace common elements, and stops there.

The consequence is that the secondary mortgage market, not the Legislature, is what actually sets a floor for Alabama condominium financial practice. When Fannie Mae tightens, Alabama associations have no state standard already sitting above the new line — so the tightening is felt directly.

It is also why an association's reserve and maintenance posture is now a marketability question rather than a purely prudential one. Buildings whose owners cannot get conforming financing sell to cash buyers at cash-buyer prices.

What we could not verify — and would not print

Several widely-circulated summaries of the 2026 condominium changes carry specifics we could not confirm at the source, because the underlying lender letter and the Freddie Mac guide were unreachable to us. We are naming them so nobody treats our silence as confirmation:

  • a reserve requirement rising from 10% to 15% of annual budgeted assessment income, said to apply to loan applications dated on or after January 4, 2027, with a reserve-study alternative;
  • expansion of the project-review waiver to projects of ten or fewer units;
  • a critical-repairs rule making a project ineligible where a recent structural or mechanical inspection shows unaddressed critical repairs, an active evacuation order, or unresolved safety issues;
  • retirement of the inflation-guard requirement on master policies;
  • Freddie Mac's aligned bulletin, reported to carry the $50,000 per-unit deductible cap from July 1, 2026 — a different date from Fannie Mae's August 5, and one that should not be merged with it.

Every figure we do state above comes from the Fannie Mae Selling Guide sections themselves, which we read. A board making decisions on the reserve percentage should have its lender or counsel confirm it against the current guide before acting.

One thing that got easier

On the FHA side, FHA INFO 2026-10 (May 20, 2026, live in FHA Connection from May 26) automated case-number assignment for units in projects eligible for Single-Unit Approval that were previously registered with a status of “Expired” or “Rejected – Register SUA.”3

That matters where an association has let FHA project approval lapse — common enough. But HUD is explicit that this is process only: a case number “is not an approval of the unit or the project,” and the change “does not represent an expansion of FHA's condo program.”

What to watch next

The January 4, 2027 date attached to the reported reserve change is the next threshold, if it is real. Between now and then, the observable signal in Alabama is at renewal: whether coastal master policies come back with deductibles inside the 5% and $50,000 caps, or whether associations start choosing between an insurable premium and a financeable building.

Related Alabama HOA Topics

← All Alabama HOA Topics

  1. Fannie Mae Selling Guide B4-2.1-01, General Information on Project Standards (version 08/05/2026)
  2. Fannie Mae Selling Guide B7-3-03, Master Property Insurance Requirements for Project Developments (version 08/05/2026)
  3. FHA INFO 2026-10 (May 20, 2026) — condominium single-unit approval case numbers, HUD Office of Single Family Housing

Stay on top of Alabama HOA law

Every week: new Alabama legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.