We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Cherokee Village settlement would cut assessment interest to 3% — and the district survives

Cherokee Village settlement would cut assessment interest to 3% — and the district survives
Arkansas · Courts

Cherokee Village settlement would cut assessment interest to 3% — and the district survives

A class action over how the Cherokee Village Suburban Improvement District levied its annual assessments has produced a proposed settlement: $470,000, assessment interest for four tax years cut from 6 percent to 3, and a district that stays in business. The district published the class notice on August 3, 2026 under court order, and a settlement statement on August 12.1

The survival point matters, because an earlier proposal reported in January 2026 would have dissolved the district entirely by September 1, 2026. That date has now passed. The district is still operating.

The case

The action is Mark and Cynthia Kronkosky, et al. v. Cherokee Village Suburban Improvement District No. 1, et al., filed in November 2025 and pending in two circuit courts at once — Fulton County Circuit Court, No. 25CV-25-122, and Sharp County Circuit Court, No. 68CV-25-262. Cherokee Village straddles the county line, and the district's assessments are collected through both counties' tax machinery.

The district's own description of the dispute is that it concerns “annual assessment procedures.” The Kronkoskys are not new to this: the same couple brought an earlier action against the district that settled in August 2021, voiding a 2018 reassessment of benefits, resetting assessments at a proportion of county assessed land value, and expanding the district's board from three elected commissioners to five.

What a suburban improvement district is, and why this matters beyond Cherokee Village

A suburban improvement district is not a homeowners association, and the difference is the whole story here. An Arkansas SID is a creature of statute organised under Title 14 of the Arkansas Code. It levies assessments of benefits on the land, and those assessments are placed on the county tax rolls and collected by the county collector alongside property taxes. Non-payment runs through the tax system rather than through a private lien and a civil suit.

That is a far more powerful collection mechanism than any Arkansas HOA has — and it is bought at the price of a statutory validity requirement that an HOA never faces. An association's right to assess comes from its recorded declaration. A district's comes from a validly levied assessment of benefits, and if the levy is defective, the collection built on top of it is defective too.

Cherokee Village is one of several Arkansas communities run this way, alongside Holiday Island and Horseshoe Bend. For owners in them, the questions that decide a dispute are statutory, not contractual.

✓ Your Arkansas State Pass is active — the full analysis below is unlocked

The proposed terms

From the district's own settlement statement, the package has four moving parts:

  • Money. “A single consolidated payment of $470,000 to the plaintiffs' side, split into two equal annual installments.”
  • Interest relief for owners. “Assessment interest rates for tax years 2023–2026 are reduced from 6% to 3%.” The district frames this as letting owners' payments “pay down principal balances faster.”
  • The counties pay something back. Sharp and Fulton Counties return 1.5 percent of collection fees.
  • Obligations on the named plaintiffs. They pay off remaining balances and refrain from acquiring additional district property.

There is also a Voluntary Payment Declaration form for owners who would rather their share of the interest relief stay in the district's operational budget — an unusual feature, and one worth understanding before signing.

Crucially, on dissolution the district's statement is not silent by accident: it says nothing about winding up and states instead that the district “remains fully operational to maintain local amenities, lakes, golf courses, and infrastructure.”

What is not yet done

This is a proposed settlement, and that is why this report is filed as pending rather than as settled law. The district says the complete settlement document will be posted once it is “officially signed by the judge and processed through the court.” Until a court approves it, none of the terms above binds anyone.

The class notice published on August 3 was issued “pursuant to a court order issued by the Circuit Court in the pending class action lawsuit,” and the district has posted an opt-out route alongside it. Inquiries are directed to Quattlebaum, Grooms & Tull PLLC, attention Andrew S. Dixon, and to the district.

We have not seen the full notice document itself — it sits behind a link the district posts — so this column is not stating the class definition, the opt-out deadline, or the date of any approval hearing. An owner in Cherokee Village who wants to opt out or object should read the notice itself and note its deadline, because a class settlement binds the members who do not.

What it changes for owners in Arkansas improvement districts

Assessment procedure is a real defence, and it is not available to HOA members. The theory in this case is about how the levy was made, not about whether the amenities were worth the money. An owner in an ordinary Arkansas subdivision arguing the same way has no equivalent argument, because a recorded declaration is a contract and its assessment machinery is whatever the instrument says. This is one of the few respects in which a district owner is better placed than an HOA member.

Interest on arrears is a bigger number than most owners realise. Halving the rate across four tax years is the part of this settlement that reaches the largest number of people. Anyone carrying a balance on Cherokee Village assessments for 2023 through 2026 should expect the arithmetic on their account to change if the settlement is approved — and should check it rather than assume it happens correctly.

Counties are exposed too. Both counties are parties, and both are returning collection fees. That is a signal worth noting for every Arkansas district: the county officers who place and collect a district assessment are not merely a conduit, and a defective levy is a problem that travels up the chain.

What to watch next

Three things. Whether the court approves the settlement, and on what terms. Whether the Voluntary Payment Declaration take-up materially changes what the district actually pays out. And whether the dissolution idea returns — it was on the table in January and is absent from the August package, but a district that has now been sued twice by the same plaintiffs over its assessment machinery has not obviously resolved the underlying question.

For the wider picture on how Arkansas districts are governed and what their disclosure duties are, see our reporting on the Improvement District Transparency Act, where a 2025 Court of Appeals decision cost two districts their elected commissioners.

Related Arkansas HOA Topics

← All Arkansas HOA Topics

  1. Cherokee Village Suburban Improvement District, Settlement Statement (Aug. 12, 2026) — the district's own account of the proposed terms
  2. Cherokee Village SID, Class Action Legal Notice (published Aug. 3, 2026 pursuant to court order) — Kronkosky v. Cherokee Village Suburban Improvement District No. 1, Fulton County Cir. No. 25CV-25-122 and Sharp County Cir. No. 68CV-25-262
  3. Cherokee Village Suburban Improvement District — district website, showing continued operations (accessed September 2026)
  4. Hallmark Times, reporting the August 2021 settlement of the earlier Kronkosky action against the district

Stay on top of Arkansas HOA law

Every week: new Arkansas legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.