Connecticut's largest housing co-op starts its handover back to residents — with the steam pipes still failing
Connecticut's largest housing co-op starts its handover back to residents — with the steam pipes still failing
2026-09-09 · Connecticut · Compliance
Success Village, the 924-household cooperative straddling Bridgeport and Stratford and Connecticut's largest common interest community in court-ordered receivership, has begun the transition back to resident control. Judge Dale Radcliffe ordered the creation of a seven-member resident advisory board, with a first meeting set for September 15, 2026. The receiver expects to exit within six to twelve months.1
It is the closing chapter of the most consequential Connecticut community-association story of the last two years, and it is not a tidy one.
How it got here
Built in 1941 and governed as a housing cooperative, Success Village went into Superior Court receivership in 2024 after a governance and financial collapse that left residents without reliable heat and hot water. Attorney Barry Knott was appointed receiver — an extraordinary intervention into privately owned housing.
In his own account of the appointment: “It's unusual for a court to take over ownership of private property. Judges don't like to do that. Especially 924 households.”1
What the receivership did
In March 2026 Knott closed a $6 million loan from the Connecticut Department of Housing — sixteen years at 0.5% interest, with one year of payments waived — and used it to clear the community's municipal debts: roughly $3 million in delinquent Bridgeport taxes and interest, $965,000 to Bridgeport's Water Pollution Control Authority for sewer, and $422,515 in back Stratford taxes.2
He also did what any receiver eventually has to do. The average monthly common charge rose 20%, from $550 to $660 — the first increase in five years — and a special assessment was imposed specifically to absorb an insurance increase: a one-time $300 payment in July, then $100 a month for three years.2
On May 27, 2026, FBI agents spent hours at a unit listed to the co-op's former board president, bagging evidence for an unspecified investigation. He maintains his innocence through counsel.3
What the residents are being handed back
The emergency is over. The underlying capital problem is not, and the numbers are the story.
Knott has put the cost of patching the community's aged underground steam pipes at $700,000 to $800,000 a year — roughly 10% of the annual budget — with a permanent fix requiring “tens of millions of dollars.” His assessment of the system: “It's untenable. … It's out of control and it's not going to get any better.”1
His fees to the point of the September report were approximately $433,000.
On the limits of his mandate: “The emergency for which I was appointed — a lack of heat and hot water — is over. Could I spend the next 10 years making this place Valhalla? Yes. But it's not the court's job.”1
Not every resident thinks the timing is right. One told the CT Post: “I personally didn't think we were ready to control ourselves for at least another maybe two, three years.”1
The legislative rescue that failed — and the local one that worked
Success Village is the reason House Bill 5500 existed. The bill would have let a municipality waive or refund interest on delinquent property taxes owed by a common interest community of more than 500 units in court-ordered receivership, and House Amendment A extended the same power to sewer charges.
It cleared Planning and Development 21-0, passed the House on April 22, 2026, reached the Senate calendar on April 24 — and was never called before adjournment on May 6.4
The relief happened anyway, locally. The mayors of Bridgeport and Stratford filed joint testimony supporting the bill in March, stating: “The residents of Success Village are the victims of this mismanagement, not the cause.”5 In June, after the session had ended, the Bridgeport City Council approved a refund reported at roughly $437,000.6
So the community got its relief through municipal decisions in a case with two mayors, a court-appointed receiver and sustained press attention behind it. The statutory authority that would have made that route available to any qualifying Connecticut community died on a calendar.
What this means for other Connecticut boards
Deferred increases are not savings. Common charges had not risen in five years before the receiver raised them 20%. Connecticut's ratification rule — a proposed budget passes unless a majority of all owners rejects it — makes modest annual increases easier to pass than most boards assume, and the alternative to a series of small increases is one large one imposed by someone else.
Insurance is now a special-assessment driver in its own right. The assessment here was raised specifically to absorb an insurance increase. Connecticut's homeowners market contracted in 2025, with four carriers notifying the Insurance Department of intent to withdraw.
A single failing system can dominate everything. A central steam plant consuming a tenth of the annual budget in patching is the kind of liability a reserve study exists to surface decades in advance. Connecticut requires no such study — a mandate was proposed in 2025 and died without a hearing — though Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac raise their replacement-reserve floor to 15% of budgeted assessment income on January 4, 2027.
Receivership is a real endpoint. It is rare, and Connecticut has just demonstrated that a court will use it on a community of 924 households when heat and hot water fail.
What to watch next
The resident advisory board met for the first time this month, and the receiver's exit is the decision point. What happens after Knott leaves — a newly self-governing board inheriting a steam system he describes as out of control, an unresolved federal investigation, and a $6 million state loan to service — has not yet been reported by anyone.
The second thing to watch is whether HB 5500 returns in the 2027 long session. It passed one chamber unanimously and drew no recorded opposition, but Connecticut bills do not carry over, and nobody has said it will be reintroduced.
Related Connecticut HOA Topics
- CT's Success Village begins transition back to resident control, CT Post (September 9, 2026) ↩
- Troubled Success Village co-op pays Bridgeport, Stratford debts, CT Post (March 6, 2026) ↩
- FBI raid reinforces concerns behind Success Village takeover, CT Post (May 29, 2026) ↩
- HB 5500 (2026) bill status and complete history — passed the House April 22, 2026; died on the Senate calendar ↩
- Joint testimony of the mayors of Bridgeport and Stratford in support of HB 5500, City of Bridgeport (March 11, 2026) ↩
- Bridgeport Council Approves $437K Refund for Success Village Residents, CT Examiner (June 2, 2026) ↩
Stay on top of Connecticut HOA law
Every week: new Connecticut legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.