We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

A DC association beat a Fair Housing claim over master-policy repairs

District of Columbia · Courts

A DC association beat a Fair Housing claim over master-policy repairs

A District of Columbia condominium association has won summary judgment on a Fair Housing Act claim that it refused to fund repairs for a Black townhome owner while paying for similar repairs for white owners. The decision is a clean illustration of what actually defeats a discrimination claim over master-policy access: bylaws that draw a clear line, and a coverage trigger applied evenly.

Reese v. Park Place Condominium Homeowners Ass'n I, No. 22-cv-02660 (CRC), was decided by Judge Cooper of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on March 21, 2025.1

The claim

The owner alleged that the association declined to fund repairs to her unit, including through its master insurance policy, while funding comparable repairs for white owners. The case was removed from DC Superior Court. An earlier ruling in September 2023 had allowed the race-discrimination claim to proceed and dismissed a retaliation claim.

The claim was brought under 42 U.S.C. § 3605, the Fair Housing Act provision covering residential real-estate-related transactions.

Why it failed

The association put forward a non-discriminatory explanation and the owner did not rebut it.

The explanation had two parts. First, under its bylaws the association is responsible only for damage affecting buildings as a whole — not for damage confined to an individual unit. Second, the association's insurance policy provides coverage for casualty damage, and the owner had not alleged a casualty event.

The court found the owner's inference from insurance loss-run reports unreasonable, noting that “the reports do not identify the units for which any insurance funds were used.” It also observed that the plaintiff's counsel had served no interrogatories, made no document requests, and deposed no witnesses.

Keep reading with the District of Columbia State Pass

The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how District of Columbia compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every District of Columbia topic on HOA Weekly.

$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.

What you unlock

  • What it means for a DC board
  • What the case does not establish
  • The record-keeping point

and 1 more section in detail

Unlock the District of Columbia

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?

Related District of Columbia HOA Topics

← All District of Columbia HOA Topics

  1. Reese v. Park Place Condominium Homeowners Ass'n I, No. 22-cv-02660 (CRC) (D.D.C. Mar. 21, 2025) — memorandum opinion ↩
  2. Reese v. Park Place Condominium Homeowners Ass'n I (D.D.C. Sept. 8, 2023) — earlier ruling on the motion to dismiss ↩

Stay on top of District of Columbia HOA law

Every week: new District of Columbia legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.