Florida rebuilt the interested-director contract test — and moved the burden onto the owner who complains
Florida rebuilt the interested-director contract test — and moved the burden onto the owner who complains
2026-09-10 · Florida · Legislation
What happened. The rule that decides whether a Florida association's contract with an interested director is voidable was rewritten, effective 1 July 2026. Chapter 2026-168 substantially reworded s. 617.0832, and reenacted both s. 718.3027 and s. 720.3033 to pull the new test into condominium and homeowners' association law.1
A defined standard where there was a general one
The rewritten section defines a “director's conflict of interest transaction” and, for the first time, defines what it means for one to be fair to the corporation: that the transaction “as a whole, is beneficial to the corporation and its members,” considering the fairness of the dealings and whether the transaction is “comparable to what might have been obtainable in an arm's length transaction.”
Where a transaction is fair when authorised, the statute now says plainly that it “is not void or voidable” and “is not grounds for any equitable relief, an award of damages, or other sanctions.”
The burden shift
This is the operative change. Under subsection (3)(a), the “person challenging the validity… has the burden of proving the lack of fairness” — but only if two conditions were met at the time:
- the material facts and the director's interest were disclosed; and
- the transaction was approved either by a majority of qualified directors — and the statute adds that “the transaction may not be authorized… solely by a single director” — or by a majority of disinterested member votes.
Do the disclosure and the qualified vote properly, and the complaining owner must prove unfairness. Skip either, and the association is defending the transaction on its merits.
A narrower definition for associations specifically
The act also creates s. 617.0143, defining “material interest” — and narrowing it for community associations. For a corporation regulated by Chapter 718, 719, 720, 721 or 723, “a ‘material interest’ is limited to familial, financial, professional, or employment interests.”
Keep reading with the Florida State Pass
The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how Florida compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every Florida topic on HOA Weekly.
$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.
What you unlock
- Why this reaches homeowners' associations directly
- The procedure that now protects the association
- How this interacts with the manager conflict rules
and 2 more sections in detail
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?
Related Florida HOA Topics
- Chapter 2026-168, Laws of Florida — §§ 11, 51, 186, 187 (ss. 617.0143, 617.0832, 718.3027, 720.3033) ↩
- Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares and Mobile Homes — complaint volumes and jurisdiction, DBPR ↩
- Notice of Proposed Rule, Rules 61B-21.001–.003 and new 61B-21.0026, published 31 July 2026 (Vol. 52/148) ↩
Stay on top of Florida HOA law
Every week: new Florida legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.