Georgia HOA Fining Authority
Section 1: Overview — Fining authority in Georgia
Start with the basic question: which of three frameworks governs fining authority in a given Georgia community? In every one, the power to fine comes from the recorded instrument, not from a free-standing grant in the statute itself. The mandatory Georgia Condominium Act, O.C.G.A. § 44-3-70 et seq., governs condominiums, and its fining provision sits at § 44-3-76.1 The Georgia Property Owners' Association Act (POAA), O.C.G.A. § 44-3-220 et seq., governs planned communities at its own fining provision, § 44-3-223 — but only if the community expressly elected into the Act by recorded declaration under § 44-3-222. Communities that did not opt in answer instead to their covenants and the common law of restrictive covenants, supplemented since July 1, 2024 by O.C.G.A. § 44-5-60.2 That opt-in requirement defines Georgia planned-community law, and it trips up more managers and attorneys than any other rule here: the POAA does not apply by default, so you have to confirm a recorded affirmative election before you apply any POAA mechanic. Georgia sets no statutory cap on fine amounts; reasonableness, drawn from case law, does that work instead, and Georgia courts have historically favored associations on liens, treating fines as sums a lien can secure.3 Whether an unpaid fine can become a lien and support foreclosure is the key downstream question, and the Quick-Reference table below — along with Section 3C — answers it. This page assumes you already know which statute governs your community, and it focuses squarely on fining mechanics.
Section 2: Quick-Reference Fining Mechanics Table
The table below lays out Georgia's fining mechanics at a glance. The Condominiums column reflects the mandatory Georgia Condominium Act (§ 44-3-70 et seq.). The Planned Communities column reflects the POAA (§ 44-3-220 et seq.) for communities that opted in by recorded declaration; non-opted-in communities operate on CC&R-derived rules, as Section 3A explains, with a statutory backstop for injunctive relief and conditional fines that § 44-5-60 added. The detailed discussion below sources every value in the table.
| # | Parameter | Condominiums | Planned Communities |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Statutory fining authority | Yes, "if and to the extent provided in the condominium instruments" (§ 44-3-76) | Yes if opted in, "if and to the extent provided in the instrument" (§ 44-3-223); else CC&R-derived, with conditional statutory authority under § 44-5-60(d)(6) for subdivisions of 15+ lots |
| 2 | Controlling source | O.C.G.A. § 44-3-76 | O.C.G.A. § 44-3-223 (if opted in; else declaration + § 44-5-60) |
| 3 | Pre-fine notice required | Not specified by statute; set by declaration | Not specified by statute; set by declaration |
| 4 | Minimum notice or cure period | Not specified by statute; set by declaration (10-day notice applies to injunctive relief, not fines) | Not specified by statute; set by declaration (10-day notice applies to injunctive relief, not fines) |
| 5 | Opportunity to be heard required | Not specified by statute; set by declaration | Not specified by statute; set by declaration |
| 6 | Hearing request or scheduling deadline | Not specified by statute; set by declaration | Not specified by statute; set by declaration |
| 7 | Written notice of decision required | Not specified by statute; set by declaration | Not specified by statute; set by declaration |
| 8 | Fine amount standard | No statutory cap; judicial reasonableness limit | No statutory cap; judicial reasonableness limit |
| 9 | Per-day / continuing fines permitted | Not prohibited by statute; permitted if instrument authorizes and amount is reasonable | Not prohibited by statute; permitted if instrument authorizes and amount is reasonable |
| 10 | Published fine schedule required | Not specified by statute; set by declaration | Not specified by statute; set by declaration |
| 11 | Fines collectible as assessments | Yes; § 44-3-109(a) lien secures sums assessed "for fines, or otherwise" | Yes; § 44-3-232(a) lien secures sums assessed "fines, or otherwise" |
| 12 | Fines securable by association lien | Yes (§ 44-3-109(a)) | Yes (§ 44-3-232(a)) |
| 13 | Fines as basis for foreclosure | Yes, if lien reaches $2,000 minimum (§ 44-3-109); SB 406 registration and payment-priority rules apply from Jan 1, 2027 | Yes currently if lien reaches $2,000; from Jan 1, 2027 fines excluded from the $4,000 / 12-month threshold calculation (SB 406) |
| 14 | Suspension of voting or amenity rights | Voting rights and common-element use may be suspended if instrument provides (§ 44-3-76); suspended vote does not count toward quorum | Fines "shall not impact voting rights"; voting rights suspendable only for unpaid regular/special assessments; amenity use suspendable (§ 44-3-223) |
| 15 | Due-process source | Condominium instruments plus common-law reasonableness | Instrument plus common-law reasonableness; from Jan 1, 2027 SB 406 complaint/hearing process before the Secretary of State |
Condominiums reflects the mandatory Georgia Condominium Act (§ 44-3-70 et seq.). Planned Communities reflects the POAA (§ 44-3-220 et seq.) for communities that opted in by recorded declaration; non-opted-in communities run on CC&R-derived rules. Last verified: July 14, 2026.
Rows 12 and 13 — the lien and foreclosure treatment of fines — carry the highest risk. Both liens expressly secure "fines," but starting January 1, 2027, SB 406 excludes fines from the POAA foreclosure threshold.
Section 3: Fining mechanics in detail
3A. Source and outer limits of fining authority
Call the condominium track mandatory but conditional. The Georgia Condominium Act applies to every condominium created under Article 3, and its enforcement provision, O.C.G.A. § 44-3-76, says that "[i]f and to the extent provided in the condominium instruments, the association shall be empowered to impose and assess fines, and suspend temporarily voting rights and the right of use of certain of the common elements in order to enforce such compliance."1 Fining authority does not stand on its own — the declaration or bylaws must authorize it. Where the instruments stay silent, the statute supplies no independent power to fine.
The planned-community track splits in two. For communities that opted in, the POAA governs, and O.C.G.A. § 44-3-223 provides that "[i]f and to the extent provided in the instrument, the association shall be empowered to impose and assess fines, which shall not impact voting rights, to suspend temporarily voting rights for failure to pay regular and special assessments, and to suspend the right of use of certain common areas and services."2 A community opts in only by recording a declaration — or amending an existing declaration under § 44-3-222 — that states an affirmative election to be governed by the Act, executed by or on behalf of all owners of the submitted property (or, for amendments, per the recorded declaration's own terms). The POAA does not reach condominium associations created under Article 3. For communities that did not opt in, fining authority comes from the CC&Rs, and since July 1, 2024, O.C.G.A. § 44-5-60(d)(6) has supplied a statutory backstop for planned subdivisions of no fewer than 15 plots: to the extent the instrument provides, such an association "shall be empowered to impose and assess fines and temporarily suspend voting rights and the right of use of certain common areas and services."4 The Georgia Nonprofit Corporation Code (Title 14, Chapter 3) supplies corporate formalities only — it is not a source of fining authority.
Ask the practical first question for any Georgia planned community: did it record a submission to the POAA? Confirm it by reading the recorded declaration for an express affirmative election; absent that language, the POAA does not apply, and the community operates under its covenants plus § 44-5-60. On amount, Georgia sets no statutory dollar cap on fines. Reasonableness supplies the outer limit instead, a standard the Court of Appeals of Georgia established in Deerlake Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Brown. There, the court affirmed a trial court's finding that "it [was] unreasonable that [the Association] ha[d] chosen to fine [Brown] $25 per day for almost five years for failure to clean and repaint a mailbox rather than simply having the work done and assessing him for the cost," and it rejected $80,225 in accumulated maintenance fines as unreasonable.3
3B. The required fining procedure
Georgia's statutes impose no general pre-fine notice-and-hearing requirement. Neither § 44-3-76 nor § 44-3-223 requires an association to give notice, hold a hearing, or issue a written decision before it levies a fine. The instrument supplies the procedure. If the declaration, bylaws, or rules require written notice, a cure period, or a hearing before fines take effect, the association must follow that process exactly — a procedural misstep can invalidate the fine. Where the instrument stays silent, though, no statutory step fills the gap.
This is where Georgia trips up the most people. The 10-day written notice in § 44-3-76 and § 44-3-223 is not a pre-fine requirement. Both sections provide that, after notice per the instrument — or, if the instrument stays silent, ten days' written notice — the association may pursue injunctive relief without first exhausting other remedies, subject to an exception where the violation "presents a clear and imminent danger to life, person, or property" or where injunctive relief would become moot before the notice period expired.1,2 That notice governs the path to court for an injunction. It does not govern the imposition of a fine. For non-opted-in planned communities, the declaration plus common-law reasonableness supply the procedure; § 44-5-60(d)(6) authorizes injunctive relief without exhausting other remedies, and it does not attach the 10-day notice requirement that the two Acts impose.4
Statute does not prohibit per-day or continuing fines, and the instrument may authorize them — but Deerlake bears directly on accumulation. A daily fine that runs unchecked for years, while the association passes up a cheaper self-help remedy, risks a court finding it unreasonable and unenforceable.3 The operative point holds across all of this: an enforceable Georgia fine depends on which framework applies, on express authorization in the instrument, and on strict adherence to the instrument's own procedure.
3C. Enforcement of unpaid fines: assessments, liens, and foreclosure
The condominium lien reaches broadly. O.C.G.A. § 44-3-109(a) makes "[a]ll sums lawfully assessed by the association against any unit owner or condominium unit, whether for the share of the common expenses pertaining to that condominium unit, for fines, or otherwise" a personal obligation of the owner and a lien on the unit — prior and superior to all other liens except ad valorem taxes, a first-priority mortgage or a mortgage recorded before the declaration, the lessor's lien under § 44-3-86, and certain secondary purchase-money mortgages.5 Fines therefore sit within the condominium lien. Foreclosure runs judicially, in superior court, after at least 30 days' notice by certified mail or statutory overnight delivery; no foreclosure may proceed unless the lien reaches at least $2,000; and the lien lapses four years after the assessment first became due.5
The POAA lien runs on a parallel track. O.C.G.A. § 44-3-232(a) secures "[a]ll sums lawfully assessed by the association against any lot owner or property owners' association lot, whether for the share of the common expenses pertaining to that lot, fines, or otherwise," again prior and superior to other liens subject to the same core exceptions.6 Fines sit within the POAA lien too. Foreclosure runs judicially, after 30 days' notice, with a $2,000 minimum and a four-year lapse.
SB 406, the Georgia Property Owners' Bill of Rights Act, changes this picture significantly for POAA communities. Effective January 1, 2027, it raises the foreclosure threshold to the lesser of $4,000 or 12 months of regular assessments — but not less than $2,000 — and it expressly bars any specific assessment, fine, or fee from counting toward that threshold. It also extends the POAA lien lapse from four years to six, and it extends the required notice of foreclosure from 30 days to 60.7 These foreclosure amendments touch only the POAA code sections; they do not modify the condominium provisions, though condominium associations still answer to SB 406's registration and payment-priority rules. Here is the change with the sharpest edge: starting January 1, 2027, any association that fails to register annually with the Georgia Secretary of State forfeits its ability to collect fines or fees, file or record liens, and initiate foreclosure.7 A payment-priority rule applies as well — partial payments must go to regular assessments first, then special assessments, then specific assessments, then fees and fines, which slows how quickly a fine can mature into a lien balance.
Non-opted-in planned communities carry no statutory assessment lien at all — lien and foreclosure rights exist only if the recorded declaration creates them, and the restrictive covenants themselves answer to the duration and renewal rules of § 44-5-60.4 On suspension, the two Acts diverge. Under the Condominium Act, a unit owner's voting rights and common-element use may be suspended if the instrument provides, and a suspended vote does not count toward quorum.1 Under the POAA, fines "shall not impact voting rights"; voting rights may be suspended only for failure to pay regular and special assessments, and no suspension may deny an owner access to the lot.2 And § 44-3-76 lets a condominium association — condos only — terminate water, gas, electricity, heat, and air conditioning for nonpayment, but only after a final judgment or judgments exceeding a total of $750, and never in a way that denies access or creates a hazardous condition.1
Section 4: Recent legislative and judicial activity
4A. Recent bills
Two developments define Georgia's current fining landscape: a sweeping 2026 oversight law that reshapes enforcement statewide, and the 2024 act that already rewrote the rules on injunctions and voting-rights suspensions.
SB 406 · Act 715 · 2025–2026 Regular Session
Governor Brian Kemp signed SB 406 — enacted as Act 715 — on May 12, 2026, after it passed the Senate 51-0 (Senate Vote #918) and the House 155-10 (House Vote #796) on March 31, 2026.[7] The act adds a new Chapter 17A to Title 43 and amends O.C.G.A. § 44-3-232, and it builds Georgia's first statewide HOA oversight framework: annual registration with the Secretary of State (a $100 fee, with registrations expiring December 31 each year), a State Board for Review of Complaints, a homeowner complaint-and-hearing process that automatically stays collection of disputed fines and fees, a 10-year records-retention requirement, a mandated payment-application order, and higher foreclosure thresholds that exclude fines.[7] Section 7 — the attorney's-fee prerequisites and judicial review for reasonableness — took effect July 1, 2026 for actions filed on or after that date; the rest of the act takes effect January 1, 2027. On fining specifically, the change that cuts sharpest is this: an unregistered association forfeits its ability to collect fines or fees, file or record liens, and initiate foreclosure.
| Property managers | Register every managed association with the Secretary of State before January 1, 2027, and reorder collection ledgers so partial payments hit regular assessments before fines — miss it, and the client loses fine-collection authority. |
| HOA board members | Confirm the association is registered, and keep 10 years of fine, lien, and foreclosure records — a missed registration voids the board's ability to collect fines or foreclose. |
| Community association attorneys | Advise clients that from July 1, 2026, attorney's fees require prior written notice, a 30-day cure window, and an itemized statement subject to judicial reasonableness review — and that fines no longer count toward the POAA foreclosure threshold from January 1, 2027. |
| Homeowners | A fine alone can no longer push a lot toward foreclosure, an unregistered HOA cannot collect fines at all, and filing a Secretary of State complaint automatically pauses collection of the disputed fine. |
HB 220 · Act 388 · 2023–2024 Regular Session
The governor signed HB 220 into law on April 22, 2024, and it took effect July 1, 2024.[4] The act amended §§ 44-3-76, 44-3-223, 44-3-106(a), 44-3-231(a), 44-3-230, and 44-5-60 to let associations pursue injunctive relief without first trying self-help — overriding Deerlake's exhaustion holding — added the "fines shall not impact voting rights" language to § 44-3-223, and added § 44-5-60(d)(6), empowering common-law associations in subdivisions of 15 or more plots to impose fines and suspend rights to the extent their instruments provide.
| Property managers | Associations can now go straight to court for an injunction after giving the required notice, instead of exhausting self-help first. |
| HOA board members | Fines can no longer strip an owner's vote in a POAA community — unpaid fines and voting-rights suspensions must stay de-linked. |
| Community association attorneys | Even non-opted-in communities of 15-plus lots now have a statutory basis for fines and injunctive relief under § 44-5-60(d)(6), to the extent the covenants provide. |
| Homeowners | An HOA can seek a court injunction more quickly, but it cannot take away voting rights over unpaid fines. |
4B. Recent appellate rulings
Between July 2023 and July 2026, no decision from the Court of Appeals of Georgia or the Supreme Court of Georgia squarely addresses HOA or condominium fine enforceability, the reasonableness of a fine amount, lien validity for fines, or foreclosure on an association lien for fines. The most recent association-enforcement decision comes closest without reaching the question — and, as the case card below shows, it does not decide fining or liens at all. The operative reasonableness limit on fine amounts therefore still traces back to Deerlake Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Brown, as HB 220 modified it by removing the self-help-exhaustion requirement.
Kinnaird v. Morningview Homeowners Association, Inc.
Kinnaird v. Morningview Homeowners Association, Inc. concerns a covenant not to sue over architectural-review decisions. The court reversed summary judgment for the association, holding that the covenant did not bar the homeowners' declaratory-judgment claim over a denied solar-panel installation — but the ruling does not touch fining or liens.
| Property managers | No new appellate ruling in the past three years limits fines further — the governing document and the reasonableness standard still control. |
| HOA board members | Architectural-review "covenant not to sue" clauses do not bar every owner suit, and this ruling does not expand fining power. |
| Community association attorneys | Fine disputes still turn on contract interpretation of the instrument and the Deerlake reasonableness limit — there has been no post-2023 appellate reset. |
| Homeowners | A challenge to a fine still rests on the covenants and on reasonableness, not on any recent case creating new fine-specific rights. |
4C. Active legislative debates
Lawmakers considered broader owner-protection measures during the 2026 session too, including proposals to let owners petition to dissolve an association (HB 1036) and to bar foreclosures for unpaid HOA fees (HB 1035). Neither advanced to enactment alongside SB 406, and expect further HOA legislation as the Secretary of State's oversight framework takes effect.
Section 5: National positioning and related coverage
Georgia occupies an unusual middle position. It runs a mandatory condominium statute alongside an opt-in planned-community statute, the POAA — a combination that sets it apart from mandatory comprehensive-statute states such as California and Florida, and from Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act states such as Alaska, Connecticut, and Colorado. Across all three Georgia frameworks, the statutes grant fining power only as the recorded instrument authorizes it, rather than conferring that power directly — a meaningful contrast with states that hand associations fining authority by statute. Georgia has leaned comparatively association-favorable on liens, letting associations secure and foreclose on fines, but SB 406 pushes the state toward stronger owner protection: it excludes fines from the foreclosure threshold and conditions enforcement powers on registration. The opt-in framework remains Georgia's defining feature — before you apply any POAA rule, confirm the community recorded a submission. On lien treatment of fines specifically, Georgia's long-standing willingness to secure and foreclose them still runs more association-favorable than owner-protective states like California, though SB 406 narrows that gap.
HOA Weekly's Georgia Fining Authority coverage updates quarterly as the legislature and the Georgia appellate courts act. Federal frameworks — including the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which can reach third-party collection of fines, the Fair Housing Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, and the FCC's OTARD rule — apply to Georgia associations regardless of the state framework.
Footnotes
- O.C.G.A. § 44-3-76, Compliance with condominium instruments, rules, and regulations; means of enforcement ↩
- O.C.G.A. § 44-3-223, Compliance with provisions of instrument and with rules and regulations; penalties for noncompliance ↩
- Deerlake Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Brown, 361 Ga. App. 860, 864 S.E.2d 202 (Ct. App. Ga. 2021), No. A21A1090 ↩
- Ga. HB 220 (2024), Act 388, enrolled text (legis.ga.gov); adds O.C.G.A. § 44-5-60(d)(6), eff. July 1, 2024 ↩
- O.C.G.A. § 44-3-109, Lien for assessments; personal obligation of unit owner; notice and foreclosure; lapse (Condominium Act) ↩
- O.C.G.A. § 44-3-232, Assessments against lot owners as constituting lien in favor of association; procedure for foreclosing lien (POAA) ↩
- Ga. SB 406 (2026), Act 715, "Georgia Property Owners' Bill of Rights Act," signed text (gov.georgia.gov) ↩