We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

An unsigned mediation term sheet is not an enforceable settlement

Hawaii · Courts

An unsigned mediation term sheet is not an enforceable settlement

An association that spent nearly seven hours in mediation, believed it had a deal, and twice persuaded a circuit court to enforce it has had both orders vacated — because nobody got the owners to sign anything.1

Association of Apartment Owners of Waikiki Banyan v. Leimkuhler and Hua, consolidated Nos. CAAP-23-0000351 and CAAP-24-0000334, summary disposition order filed February 23, 2026. Unpublished; no certiorari disposition on record as of this writing.

What the association had, and what it did not

The underlying dispute came out of remodeling work on the owners’ unit, with the association threatening a fine of $500 per day that the owners say the governing documents do not authorise. After the mediation, the owners’ then-counsel told the association’s counsel and the mediator that his clients agreed to a term sheet — one that included the association waiving roughly $71,000 in fines.

The owners never signed it. And the term sheet the association’s president approved was not the same document as the one said to embody the deal.

Why the proof failed

“the Gray Declaration asserts that Ogomori confirmed to Gray that Owners agreed to the Exhibit 1 term sheet. This statement was not based on Gray’s personal knowledge and is inadmissible hearsay.… Without the Gray Declaration’s inadmissible statement… there is no evidence of such agreement. The Exhibit 1 term sheet was not signed by Owners, and does not reflect their approval.”

The mismatch between the two term sheets independently created a fact issue under McKenna v. Association of Owners of Hokulani. And because the association “failed to meet its initial summary judgment burden as movant,” the burden never shifted — so “the circuit court must, at minimum, hold an evidentiary hearing as to those genuine issues of fact.”

Keep reading with the Hawaii State Pass

The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how Hawaii compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every Hawaii topic on HOA Weekly.

$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.

What you unlock

  • The practice this decision ends
  • How this sits with the statutory mediation regime
  • The parallel federal case, and what it shows

and 2 more sections in detail

Unlock Hawaii

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?

Related Hawaii HOA Topics

← All Hawaii HOA Topics

  1. AOAO of Waikiki Banyan v. Leimkuhler, Nos. CAAP-23-0000351 and CAAP-24-0000334, Hawaii ICA summary disposition order, February 23, 2026 ↩
  2. Hua v. AOAO of Waikiki Banyan, Civ. No. 23-00424 LEK-WRP (D. Haw. Feb. 12, 2025), order on motion to dismiss ↩

Stay on top of Hawaii HOA law

Every week: new Hawaii legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.