We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Minnesota's Starter Homes Act was voted down 7–5 in March

Minnesota · Legislation

Minnesota's Starter Homes Act was voted down 7–5 in March

What happened. Minnesota's Starter Homes Act — the lead bill of the Yes to Homes coalition and the biggest zoning-reform vehicle of the biennium — was voted down on a 7–5 roll call in the House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee on 23 March 2026. The Senate companion never got a hearing.1

It is not law. It died in a committee, not on a floor, which is a distinction that matters for what happens next.

The HOA provision

The revised 2026 version imposed three mandates on every Minnesota city: allow accessory dwelling units in residential areas; eliminate certain design and aesthetic standards including porch requirements, shutters and garage minimums; and prohibit mandatory homeowners associations.

Around that sat a menu of eleven zoning-reform options from which large cities would pick six, mid-sized cities four, and smaller cities three — options including eliminating parking minimums, allowing eight-plexes, or offering subsidies.

The HOA half is now largely moot

This is the part readers should not miss. The prohibition on cities requiring an association as a development condition passed anyway, in the other bill.

Section 14 of Laws 2026, ch. 82 creates Minn. Stat. § 515B.5-101, barring a local government from conditioning approval of a residential building permit, conditional use permit, subdivision, planned unit development or other residential development permit on the creation of an HOA, on common features necessitating one unless the developer requests them, on terms in the governing documents, or on the adoption or revocation of association rules. Effective 1 January 2027 for communities created on or after that date.

So the Starter Homes Act's HOA provision failed and the policy is law. What did not pass is the rest: the ADU mandate, the design-standard preemption, and the tiered zoning menu.

Who was for and against

The bill was carried by Reps. Spencer Igo (R-Wabana Township) and Michael Howard (DFL-Richfield), a deliberately bipartisan pairing, with Rep. Larry Kraft (DFL-St. Louis Park); the Senate companion was Sen. Lindsey Port (DFL-Burnsville).

Backers included Neighbors For More Neighbors, Housing First Minnesota and the Minnesota Housing Partnership. The League of Minnesota Cities opposed it.2

Keep reading with the Minnesota State Pass

The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how Minnesota compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every Minnesota topic on HOA Weekly.

$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.

What you unlock

  • Why a zoning bill is association news
  • What Chapter 82 does and does not do to architectural authority
  • The coalition's own account of what comes next

and 3 more sections in detail

Unlock Minnesota

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?

Related Minnesota HOA Topics

← All Minnesota HOA Topics

  1. “Revised Starter Homes Act gets informational hearing,” Minnesota House Session Daily (3 Mar. 2026) ↩
  2. “The Starter Homes Act: Explained” — Neighbors For More Neighbors ↩
  3. “2026 Legislative Session Recap” — Neighbors For More Neighbors ↩
  4. “Who is running for Minnesota governor in 2026, with Tim Walz out” — MPR News ↩
  5. Minnesota House Session Daily (27 Apr. 2026) — Strengthen Minnesota Homes funding bill ↩

Stay on top of Minnesota HOA law

Every week: new Minnesota legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.