A developer cannot dissolve your covenants by recording a release
A developer cannot dissolve your covenants by recording a release
2026-09-15 · Ohio · Courts
A developer recorded a document releasing the protective covenants on a subdivided Ohio farm. Ohio's Twelfth District held the release was a nullity and the 2004 covenants remain in effect — and then held the covenants did not prohibit the thing the neighbour objected to.1
Meeker v. Nolt, 2026-Ohio-2644, C.A. No. CA2026-02-005, came out of Brown County. A neighbour sued to stop a commercial egg-production facility on land subject to 2004 recorded restrictive covenants, after the original developer had filed a unilateral “Release of Protective Covenants and Restrictions.”
Standing, and the release
On who may enforce:
“we conclude that the subsequent owners of the subdivided Hall Ring farm were intended beneficiaries of the restrictive covenants. Meeker is one such owner and therefore may maintain an action to prevent cancellation and enforce the covenants.” (¶ 19)
And on the release itself, the court modified the judgment below:
“The trial court's judgment is modified to reflect that Hall Ring's unilateral 'Release of Protective Covenants and Restrictions' was ineffective and that the covenants and restrictions recorded in 2004 remain in effect on the Nolts' land.” (¶ 31)
And then the neighbour lost anyway
“we find that the restrictive covenants remain in effect on the Nolts' property, however they do not prohibit the construction and operation of a commercial egg-production facility, and this planned facility does not constitute an anticipated private nuisance.” (¶ 15)
Standing is not the same as winning. Covenants are construed strictly against the restriction, and a use the drafters did not name is not prohibited.
The court also disposed of a procedural point worth knowing: a trial court entry “approving” a magistrate's decision “was not a final judgment because it was not a clear pronouncement of judgment ordering or declining to order a form of relief.” (¶ 12)
Covenants are construed strictly against the restriction in Ohio. Our Ohio architectural review page shows what that means for design controls.
Who enforces when there is no association
This is the situation Ohio's statutory framework does not really address. R.C. chapter 5312 assumes an owners association exists. A great many Ohio subdivisions — particularly older rural and semi-rural plats — have recorded covenants and no association at all, or an association that was never incorporated or has since had its charter cancelled.
In those communities the individual lot owners are the enforcement mechanism, as intended beneficiaries of the covenants, and Meeker confirms they have standing to act. There is no board to complain to and no assessment funding a lawyer. Enforcement means one owner paying for it. Our Ohio governing statute page covers the difference between a covenanted subdivision and a statutory planned community.
The developer-release problem is more common than it sounds
A declarant that still holds unsold lots, or believes it retains declarant rights, will sometimes record an instrument purporting to release, amend or terminate the covenants — usually because a buyer for a remaining parcel wants a use the covenants forbid.
Meeker says a unilateral release does not work. The covenants belong to the beneficiaries, not to the developer, once the lots have been sold into the scheme.
The related Ohio authority points the same way on amendments. In Alum Cliff Industries v. Hickory Woods Home Owners' Association, 2026-Ohio-2756, the Twelfth District upheld an amendment executed after the development period had expired, because the declaration's own amendment section required only 75 percent owner approval plus the President's and Secretary's signatures at that stage — not the declarant's. The court's reasoning: “The HOA executed the Third Amendment in 2012, well after the Development Period expired in 2001 as set forth in the Declaration.” (¶ 38)
Many Ohio associations believe they cannot amend because a long-departed developer will not sign. Check the post-development-period track in your own amendment section before accepting that.
The drafting lesson for anyone amending covenants
The neighbour in Meeker had valid covenants, standing to enforce them, and no remedy — because the covenants did not name the use.
Ohio courts construe restrictive covenants strictly against the restriction and in favour of the free use of land. That principle appears in essentially every Ohio covenant decision, and it has decided several this year: it is why a “sell and convey to a purchaser” clause did not reach a gift, and why a fee clause covering “enforcing the restrictions” did not cover defending a discrimination complaint.
The practical implication is uncomfortable for drafters. General-purpose language does not stretch to cover uses nobody anticipated. A covenant limiting lots to “residential purposes” will be tested against short-term rental, against a home business, against an accessory dwelling unit, and against agricultural operations — and in each case the question is what the words actually say, not what the community assumes they mean.
Three things to do
If a release or termination has been recorded against your subdivision, do not assume it worked. Get it looked at. A unilateral developer instrument is vulnerable.
If your community has covenants and no functioning association, identify who would enforce. The answer is an individual owner, at their own cost, and it is worth the community knowing that before a dispute rather than during one.
When you amend, name the use. Short-term rental, accessory dwelling unit, commercial agriculture, home business — if the community wants them addressed, the amendment has to say so. Strict construction is not a drafting problem you can argue your way out of afterwards.
Related Ohio HOA Topics
Stay on top of Ohio HOA law
Every week: new Ohio legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.