We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Half of Stowe's short-term rentals are condo units

Vermont · Regulation

Half of Stowe's short-term rentals are condo units

Stowe's selectboard voted 5–0 on July 22, 2026 to adopt a revised short-term rental ordinance with an “aspirational” cap of 850 licences town-wide. The fight that produced it was, to a remarkable degree, a fight among condominium associations.1

The numbers behind the ordinance

Reporting from January 2026, while the ordinance was in draft, put Stowe's registered short-term rentals at 1,039 — of which 483, nearly half, were condominium units. Three hundred and sixty registrations sat in resort and ski zoning districts. Nine hundred and thirty had no homestead declaration.

Stowe has 55 condominium complexes, and 37 of them have at least one registered short-term rental. More than two-thirds of the condominium rentals sit in six complexes.2

What the ordinance does

The 850 figure is derived from roughly 1,450 current short-term rentals minus roughly 600 deemed commercial or inactive; town officials expect actual counts to exceed 850 for years. Non-residents are barred from obtaining new licences after September 15, 2026, with existing non-resident registrants grandfathered subject to annual renewal. Stowe homestead owners may hold at most two licences. New non-resident entry runs through a lottery that opens once inventory drops below 850.

✓ Your Vermont State Pass is active — the full analysis below is unlocked

The classification fight

Resort planned unit developments were excluded from the cap. Two condominium communities were told they could appeal their commercial designations to the selectboard.

The consequence, reported at the time, is the part that generalises: condominium associations outside the resorts began seeking their own exemptions. A municipal ordinance that distinguishes commercial from residential inventory forces every association in town into an argument about which one it is — an argument with no analogue in the association's own governing documents.

Counsel for one resort warned the selectboard that without an exemption, a planned expansion project “will become immediately irretrievably infeasible.”

The per-bedroom model further south

Stowe capped licences. Southern Vermont ski towns went after the money instead, and the numbers reach individual unit owners inside associations.3

  • Winhall — ordinance adopted December 4, 2024; an estimated 400 to 600 short-term rentals; $500 per bedroom, capped at $4,000 annually; wastewater-permit and fire-safety focus.
  • Londonderry — roughly 100 registered; $250 per bedroom annually for unhosted rentals; a 50-day cap on future unhosted units; no overall licence cap.
  • Dorset — about 45 units; $300 annually; registration triggered at 14 nights in 12 months.
  • Village of Manchester — $300. Sunderland — $50.

Statewide there are roughly 12,000 short-term rental units, and Act 183 of 2024 imposed a 3 percent surcharge on short-term rentals effective August 1, 2024.

What Vermont state law does not do

There is no statewide short-term rental licensing statute and no statewide registry. H.242, which would have created one along with a host-occupancy requirement and a one-rental-per-parcel cap — amending the definition in 18 V.S.A. § 4301 to cover “a furnished house, condominium, or other dwelling room or self-contained dwelling unit” — was introduced February 18, 2025, heard once in committee on March 21, 2025, and died with the biennium.

Operators are subject to meals and rooms tax registration, the short-term rental surcharge, and the Rental Housing Health and Safety Code. Those govern operators, not association authority.

Where the association's own authority comes from

The declaration. VCIOA does not itself restrict rentals; it authorises the declaration to impose use restrictions, and 27A V.S.A. § 3-120(f)(3) frames what a rental restriction may do. Pre-1999 Vermont condominiums operate under the Condominium Ownership Act plus their declarations, and § 3-120 does not reach them at all.

The result for a Stowe unit owner is three layers of regulation that do not coordinate: the town's licence and cap, the state's tax and safety code, and the declaration — which may permit what the town now limits, or prohibit what the town would licence.

What to watch next

The bill that would have overridden association leasing bans, S.305, expressly carved out short-term rentals as defined in 18 V.S.A. § 4301. Item (1) of the Act 179 study due November 15, 2026 covers leasing of residential units; whether it carries the same carve-out is the question for Vermont resort communities.

Related Vermont HOA Topics

← All Vermont HOA Topics

  1. Patrick Bilow, “After years of debate, Stowe caps short-term rentals,” Stowe Reporter / VTDigger, July 30, 2026 ↩
  2. “Stowe resorts lobby for short-term rental cap carveouts,” Stowe Reporter / VTDigger, Jan. 16, 2026 ↩
  3. Andrew McKeever, “The region’s short-term rental market and regulations are evolving,” Brattleboro Reformer, May 1, 2025 ↩

Stay on top of Vermont HOA law

Every week: new Vermont legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.