We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Arizona Supreme Court lets HOAs sue builders over homes they do not own

Arizona · Courts

Arizona Supreme Court lets HOAs sue builders over homes they do not own

An Arizona homeowners association may sue a builder for construction defects in homes the association does not own and never bought. The Arizona Supreme Court so held on July 29, 2026 in Gallery Community Association v. K. Hovnanian at Gallery, LLC, a published opinion authored by Justice Montgomery.1

Chief Justice Timmer dissented, joined by Justice King.

The obstacle the case removed

Arizona's implied warranty of workmanship and habitability is a creature of contract. It runs to a home buyer, including a subsequent purchaser, and it has traditionally required the plaintiff to stand in a purchaser's shoes. An association is not a purchaser. It buys nothing from the builder, and in most communities it does not own the houses.

That left associations in an awkward position: the entity with the resources, the standing motive and the professional management to pursue a defect claim across an entire subdivision was the one entity arguably unable to bring it.

What the court held

The question, as the opinion frames it, was “whether, by enacting A.R.S. § 33-2002, the Legislature has authorized a homeowners' association to bring such a suit regarding both common areas it owns and properties owned by individual homeowners.”

The answer was yes:

We hold that, because § 33-2002 and related statutes encompass a cause of action for construction defects arising out of a failure to adhere to community workmanship standards, the Legislature has modified the common law to authorize homeowners' associations to bring what constitutes an implied warranty suit.

Two features of that sentence carry the weight. The court did not find privity or reinterpret the common-law warranty; it held the legislature displaced the common-law limits by statute. And the authorization reaches both categories of property — common areas the association owns, and homes it does not.

Keep reading with the Arizona State Pass

The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how Arizona compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every Arizona topic on HOA Weekly.

$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.

What you unlock

  • What it changes for boards and managers
  • The dissent is worth reading
  • What to watch next
Unlock Arizona

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?

Related Arizona HOA Topics

← All Arizona HOA Topics

  1. Gallery Community Ass'n v. K. Hovnanian at Gallery, LLC, CV-24-0252-PR (Ariz. July 29, 2026) — published opinion ↩
  2. Pointe 16 Community Ass'n v. GTIS-HOV Pointe 16, LLC, CV-24-0182-PR (Ariz. Sept. 4, 2025) — published opinion on assignment of accrued claims ↩

Stay on top of Arizona HOA law

Every week: new Arizona legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.