Arizona HOA boards cannot vote in executive session, and the ruling is now final
Arizona HOA boards cannot vote in executive session, and the ruling is now final
2026-09-10 · Arizona · Courts
The Arizona Supreme Court declined on September 8, 2026 to review a decision holding that a planned community board may discuss matters privately but must vote in the open. The denial makes A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association final and binding on Arizona associations.1
Division One of the Court of Appeals issued the published opinion on April 28, 2026. The Supreme Court's order, entered as docket entry 8 in CV-26-0167-PR, reads simply that the petition for review is denied.2
What the board had been doing
The facts are unusually concrete for a statutory-construction case, and they explain why the dispute was worth taking to the Supreme Court. In its closed meetings, the Sunland Springs board had, among other things:
- approved a $917,000 budget item;
- granted the community manager up to $7,000 in discretionary spending authority;
- addressed 13 waivers of the community's minimum age requirement for residents; and
- authorized foreclosures against two homeowners.
For notice, the association supplied members the date, time and place of closed meetings and quoted the language of A.R.S. § 33-1804(A). A homeowner filed a declaratory judgment action in December 2023.
The holding on voting
Section 33-1804(A) allows a portion of a meeting to be closed if the closed portion is “limited to consideration of” seven listed subjects. The association argued that consideration includes deciding.
The court's answer turned on a different sentence of the same subsection — the one requiring a board to let a member speak “once after the board has discussed a specific agenda item but before the board takes formal action on that item.” As the opinion puts it, if § 33-1804(A) allowed associations to vote in a closed meeting, “then a member could not speak after discussion but before formal action on a closed-meeting agenda item. We cannot adopt an interpretation that renders statutory language a nullity.”
Consideration, in other words, is deliberation. Action belongs in the open meeting.
Keep reading with the Arizona State Pass
The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how Arizona compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every Arizona topic on HOA Weekly.
$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.
What you unlock
- The second holding, on agendas
- What it changes for boards and managers
- How this sits with the new statute
and 1 more section in detail
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?
Related Arizona HOA Topics
- A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village HOA, 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. App. Div. One, Apr. 28, 2026) — published opinion ↩
- Arizona Supreme Court docket, CV-26-0167-PR — petition for review denied September 8, 2026 ↩
- A.R.S. § 33-1804, Open meetings; exceptions; notice; agenda ↩
- SB 1290, Chapter 222, Laws 2026 — the “without action” amendment, effective September 12, 2026 ↩
Stay on top of Arizona HOA law
Every week: new Arizona legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.