We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Lakewood voters repealed the city's entire zoning overhaul — and covenants were never at stake

Lakewood voters repealed the city's entire zoning overhaul — and covenants were never at stake
Colorado · Legislation

Lakewood voters repealed the city's entire zoning overhaul — and covenants were never at stake

Lakewood voters repealed the city's entire zoning code overhaul on April 7, 2026, by roughly sixty-four percent on all four ballot questions. It is the clearest instance in Colorado of neighbourhood-level opposition to density using a tool associations do not have — the municipal referendum — and it is worth being precise about what it did and did not change.1

It did not change a single covenant. The four questions were about the city's public zoning code, and repeal restored public zoning. A declaration changes only through the amendment process the declaration itself sets out.

The result

QuestionYes (repeal)No (keep)
116,7179,343
216,6329,447
316,6829,373
416,6499,400

Total votes cast: 35,574, roughly 32% of registered voters.

What was repealed

Ordinances O-2025-27, O-2025-28, O-2025-29 and O-2025-30, passed between August 28 and October 13, 2025. Between them they eliminated the term “single-family zoning” citywide; created low-form residential and mid-form residential districts; collapsed housing types into a single “Residential Dwelling” category; permitted up to four or more units per lot, with a special permit required through January 1, 2027; set maximum floor area at 4,000 square feet for one to two units and 5,000 for three or more; capped buildings at three floors and 5,000 square feet in low-form areas; reduced minimum lot sizes; allowed retail up to 750 square feet in residential areas; and allowed duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes from January 2026 in areas previously reserved for detached houses.

The package was framed as compliance with four state laws: HB24-1007 on occupancy, HB24-1152 on accessory dwelling units, HB24-1304 on parking, and HB24-1313 on transit-oriented communities.

✓ Your Colorado State Pass is active — the full analysis below is unlocked

How the referendum got there

Four separate referendum petitions were filed. A protest was filed November 25, 2025; a validity hearing was held December 19, 2025; and a hearing officer validated the petitions under Lakewood Municipal Code § 2.52.150 and C.R.S. § 31-11-110(3). Council voted on January 27, 2026 to call a special election.

Lakewood's Home Rule Charter requires signatures from at least 3% of registered electors as of the last regular municipal election — roughly 3,500. Each petition carried at least 3,600, three of them over 4,000, with organisers reporting more than 10,000 signatures collected overall.

The Article 3 design-standards vote in council had been 9–2 on September 23, 2025, with Councilmembers David Rein and Paula Nystrom opposed.

What the vote did not solve

The state mandates were not repealed by a city election. Councilmember Roger Low put the problem on the record: “One of the many reasons we passed (the ordinances) was to comply with state law, so that we would not be competing for important state resources.”

Lakewood remains on the HB24-1313 transit-oriented communities list, with a December 31, 2026 Housing Opportunity Goal report due to the Department of Local Affairs. And Governor Jared Polis signed an executive order on May 16, 2025 conditioning certain state transportation and energy grant funding on compliance. The compliance problem the repeal creates is Lakewood's, not any association's.

The two points a Lakewood board needs to make to its members

First: the declaration did not change, in either direction. A board that assumed the 2025 overhaul had loosened its own design standards, or that the April 2026 repeal has now tightened them, is wrong both times. Public zoning says what the city will permit. It does not say what a recorded declaration permits.

Second: the one state law that does reach declarations was never on the Lakewood ballot. HB24-1152 (2024) added subsection (4) to C.R.S. 38-33.3-106.5, voiding association provisions that restrict the creation of an accessory dwelling unit in a designated jurisdiction in a way prohibited by C.R.S. 29-35-103. Three limits on that preemption are load-bearing: it operates only in a “subject jurisdiction” or a certified accessory-dwelling-unit-supportive jurisdiction; it applies to an accessory use to a single-unit detached dwelling, so condominium and shared-wall townhome communities are largely outside it; and “reasonable restrictions” survive — defined as a condition that does not unreasonably increase cost, effectively prohibit construction, or extinguish the ability to build.

Whether a particular association restriction is a permitted “reasonable restriction” is a fact question we do not answer for individual disputes.

Why this matters beyond Lakewood

The Lakewood result is now the reference point in Colorado for what organised residential opposition to density can do, and the tool it used is a municipal one. An HOA has no referendum power over a city's zoning code — it has covenants, which bind its members and nobody else, and whatever standing its members have as voters.

The parallel fight is in court. Six home-rule cities — Arvada, Aurora, Glendale, Greenwood Village, Lafayette and Westminster — sued the State of Colorado and Governor Polis in Denver District Court on May 19, 2025, challenging HB24-1313 and HB24-1304 on the ground that land use and zoning are matters of exclusive local concern under Article XX, section 6 of the Colorado Constitution, and asking the court to declare that the two laws “have neither force nor effect in the Cities.” No final ruling has been located. Notably, that complaint does not challenge HB24-1152 — the one statute in the group that reaches into declarations.

One sourcing note: this article does not assert that the four Lakewood ordinances were silent on covenants. Their texts were not obtained, and neither the legal analyses nor the press coverage reviewed mentions HOAs, covenants or metro districts. Anyone wanting to state that silence definitively should pull O-2025-27 through O-2025-30 from Lakewood's own records.

Related Colorado HOA Topics

← All Colorado HOA Topics

  1. "Lakewood voters strike down pro-density zoning," The Colorado Sun, April 8, 2026 — the result and the Roger Low quotation
  2. "Lakewood Puts Zoning Changes to a Vote in Upcoming Special Election," Otten Johnson Robinson Neff Ragonetti — ordinance numbers, referendum chronology and the charter signature threshold
  3. "Lakewood City Council approves reconfiguring of single-family zoning," Colorado Politics, September 23, 2025 — the 9-2 vote and the district framework
  4. HB24-1152 signed act, adding C.R.S. 38-33.3-106.5(4) — the ADU covenant preemption and its "reasonable restriction" exception
  5. Land use preemptions challenged, Colorado Municipal League — the six-city lawsuit

Stay on top of Colorado HOA law

Every week: new Colorado legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.