We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Colorado's turf law names common interest community property — and most boards misread it

Colorado's turf law names common interest community property — and most boards misread it
Colorado · Regulation

Colorado's turf law names common interest community property — and most boards misread it

Colorado's nonfunctional turf prohibition names common interest community property expressly, and it has been operative since January 1, 2026 — but it does not say what most boards assume it says. HB25-1113 was signed May 20, 2025 and took effect August 6, 2025, extending the regime SB24-005 created. Its sponsors were Representatives Lesley Smith and Karen McCormick with Senator Dylan Roberts.1

What the regime actually prohibits

Under SB24-005, on and after January 1, 2026, local entities may not install or allow the installation of nonfunctional turf, artificial turf, or invasive plant species on commercial, institutional or industrial property, common interest community property, or a street right-of-way, parking lot, median or transportation corridor.

HB25-1113 extends the regime to multifamily residential premises with more than twelve dwelling units beginning January 1, 2028, and requires local entities to enact or amend their own development regulations accordingly by that date.

The three things boards get wrong

It is a duty on local entities, not a command to a board. Cities, counties and districts are the addressees. The statute does not make an association liable for anything, and no state agency enforces it against an association.

No existing turf must be removed. The prohibition is on installation, in new or redeveloped projects. A Colorado community with an established bluegrass common area is not required to tear it out.

And it does not let a board force turf on anyone. Running the other way, Colorado's water-wise landscaping provisions in C.R.S. 38-33.3-106.5, added by SB23-178, provide that an association “may not prohibit the use of xeriscape, nonvegetative turf grass, or drought-tolerant vegetative landscapes to provide ground covering to property.” A board enforcing a must-maintain-living-lawn covenant against an owner who wants to convert is on the wrong side of law that predates all of this.

✓ Your Colorado State Pass is active — the full analysis below is unlocked

Where it does bite an association

The exposure is not enforcement. It is procurement.

A board planning a common-element replant or a redevelopment on association land needs to check whether the local government's development regulations now bar the grass the landscape architect specified. The prohibition operates through the local entity's approvals, so an association project that requires a permit, a site plan approval or a landscape review can be refused on that basis — not because the association broke the statute, but because the city can no longer approve nonfunctional turf.

“Nonfunctional turf” is the term to understand. Denver's own definition, used in its landscape work, is “cool-season, bluegrass turf such as kentucky bluegrass, tall fescue, and perennial ryegrass that requires a lot of water to maintain its appearance” when found in areas like medians, roadsides or parking lots. The concept is turf nobody walks on.

The practical sequence for a board is therefore: confirm whether the project needs a local approval; ask the jurisdiction whether its regulations have been amended yet, because many have not; and specify the planting palette accordingly rather than discovering the problem at review.

Colorado towns are already writing it into local code

Two examples confirm the pattern. The Town of Basalt adopted Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2025 on non-native turf. The Town of Ridgway adopted Ordinance No. 03-2025. Neither is in a major metro, and both show smaller Colorado jurisdictions putting the state floor into their own codes during 2025 — ahead of the 2028 deadline.

Denver is drafting the biggest version. The Denver Resilient Landscapes zoning text amendment would update the city's landscape requirements and ban planting nonfunctional turf in residential, commercial and industrial development and along roads and medians. No council bill number has been assigned; the project ran Phase 1 engagement from March to September 2025 and Phase 2 from September to December 2025, with an advisory committee meeting through December 2025, and final review and City Council approval anticipated in 2026. That makes it a proposal, not law.

Denver's own materials are explicit about scope, and this is the sentence that answers a panicked member: the rules under consideration “would apply to new development and some redevelopment sites only. Denver residents who are interested in changing their landscape will have access to project resources … but this will not be a requirement for existing property.”

The project materials contain no discussion of HOA covenants or of enforcement against homeowners' existing landscaping.

The combined picture, stated once

Put the three Colorado instruments together and the position is coherent, if rarely explained:

An association cannot force turf on an owner who wants xeriscape — C.R.S. 38-33.3-106.5, since SB23-178.

A local government can no longer approve new nonfunctional turf on common-element projects, and from 2028 on larger multifamily projects — SB24-005 as extended by HB25-1113.

And an association may still fine an owner who is not watering to the maximum a local restriction permits — the reading the state's own HOA Information and Resource Center published on July 23, 2026, after Colorado entered Phase 3 of its Drought Response Plan on June 4, 2026. The shield in C.R.S. 38-33.3-302(k)(II) protects the owner watering at the permitted ceiling, not the owner who stopped.

Three rules, three directions, and none of them says a Colorado association must replace its lawn.

What to watch next

January 1, 2028 is the date to diary: the multifamily extension takes effect and local entities must have amended their development regulations. For an association that owns or manages buildings above twelve units, that is when the procurement problem arrives.

Nearer term, watch the Denver text amendment for a council bill number, and watch your own jurisdiction's landscape code. The state's own summary of HB25-1113 is published by the Division of Real Estate's HOA Information and Resource Center, which has been running landscaping education for boards — a March 4, 2026 forum on lawn conversion resources and water-wise landscaping, and the July 2026 drought advisory. Twenty-three complaints reached the state in 2025 in its xeriscaping and landscaping category.

Related Colorado HOA Topics

← All Colorado HOA Topics

  1. HB25-1113, "Limit Turf in New Residential Development" — bill page, sponsors, signing and effective dates, Colorado General Assembly
  2. SB24-005 — bill page, the underlying nonfunctional turf prohibition naming common interest community property
  3. HB25-1113 summary, Colorado Division of Real Estate, HOA Information and Resource Center
  4. SB23-178, "Water-wise Landscaping in Homeowners' Association Communities" — bill page, Colorado General Assembly
  5. Denver Resilient Landscapes text amendment project page, City and County of Denver (scope and timeline)
  6. Ordinance No. 22, Series of 2025 (Non-Native Turf), Town of Basalt

Stay on top of Colorado HOA law

Every week: new Colorado legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.