Connecticut court binds a former condo board president to a settlement she refused to sign
Connecticut court binds a former condo board president to a settlement she refused to sign
2026-09-09 · Connecticut · Courts
A former Connecticut condominium board president who refused to sign a settlement her lawyer had negotiated is bound by it anyway, the Appellate Court held in a decision released August 4, 2026.1
Nunez v. Brown-White, AC 48330, 240 Conn. App. 685, is the year's clearest illustration of how expensive intra-board conflict becomes once it reaches court — and of how little control a litigant retains once counsel is negotiating.
What happened
Soledad Nunez was a resident, association member and former president of the executive board of Seaview Village Condominium Association, Inc. She sued a fellow board member, Gwendolyn Brown-White, and the association itself — suing Brown-White both individually and in her capacity as board secretary.
The complaint ran to four counts: invasion of privacy by false light, defamation per se, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and a claim under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act. She alleged a “campaign of intimidation, harassment, abuse, and blatantly false narratives.”
Her lawyer settled the case. She declined to sign. The defendants moved to enforce the settlement, and the trial court held a hearing under Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc., 225 Conn. 804 (1993).
The holding
The panel — Seeley, Wilson and Flynn, Js., opinion by Judge Seeley — affirmed. The trial court's finding that the parties had reached a meeting of the minds was not clearly erroneous.1
Counsel's emails to opposing counsel, memorialising the pretrial terms and expressly accepting the offer, were properly relied on. The client's failure to sign was unavailing. Her unsworn declaration disputing her lawyer's actual authority carried no evidentiary weight, and she never sought an articulation of the trial court's decision.
Keep reading with the Connecticut State Pass
The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how Connecticut compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every Connecticut topic on HOA Weekly.
$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.
What you unlock
- The part that should worry board members
- CUTPA against a board member, and against the association
- What associations can actually do about this
and 1 more section in detail
Already a subscriber? Sign in
Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?
Related Connecticut HOA Topics
- Nunez v. Brown-White, AC 48330, 240 Conn. App. 685 — slip opinion, Connecticut Appellate Court (officially released August 4, 2026) ↩
- HB 6166 (2025), pilot program for mediation of condominium disputes in the Probate Courts — died in the Judiciary Committee ↩
- Most Common Homeowners Association (HOA) Complaints, Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (March 11, 2026) ↩
Stay on top of Connecticut HOA law
Every week: new Connecticut legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.