We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Delaware: a manufactured-home resident who is not the owner or leaseholder has no standing

Delaware: a manufactured-home resident who is not the owner or leaseholder has no standing
Delaware · Courts

Delaware: a manufactured-home resident who is not the owner or leaseholder has no standing

Delaware's manufactured home community protections attach to a legal position, not to living somewhere. A resident who is neither the titled owner of the home nor the leaseholder of the lot cannot bring the statute's retaliation or arbitrary-enforcement claims at all.

Buhler v. Winterset Farms, MHC, LLC, C.A. No. 2025-1022-SEM, was dismissed by Senior Magistrate in Chancery Selena E. Molina on January 20, 2026.1

What the court held on standing

The plaintiff lived in the community but held neither title to the manufactured home nor the lot lease. On that footing the court held he lacked standing to assert:

  • 25 Del. C. § 7019 — retaliation by a community owner
  • 25 Del. C. § 7018(b) — arbitrary or capricious enforcement of occupancy and use rules
  • 42 U.S.C. § 3617 — federal interference, coercion and intimidation

— or to seek a declaratory judgment on any of them, absent well-pleaded facts establishing his own property rights or interests.2

Three further holdings on what does not exist

The court cleared away three theories that recur in Delaware housing disputes.

The Landlord-Tenant Code displaces the common-law claim for quiet enjoyment. A resident cannot plead around the statutory scheme by reaching for the common law.

Delaware recognises no private civil cause of action for harassment.

There is no Delaware tort of “interference with a housing relationship.”

The court also flagged that Chancery was not the right forum in any event, given parallel eviction proceedings.

✓ Your Delaware State Pass is active — the full analysis below is unlocked

Why this is a real problem and not a technicality

The gap this decision marks out is occupied by a lot of people.

Delaware's manufactured-home framework assumes a homeowner who owns the structure and leases the lot. Actual households frequently do not match that: an adult child living in a parent's home; a spouse or partner not on the title; someone occupying a home held by an estate; a family member with a partial interest. On this holding, none of them can invoke § 7019 or § 7018(b) in their own name.

The remedy has to run through whoever holds the legal position. Where that person is unavailable, unwilling, or dead, the occupant's statutory route closes.

What the legislature did about part of it — and when

Delaware has moved on the inheritance half of this problem, though not on the general standing question.

Senate Substitute 2 for SB 56, effective September 3, 2025 (85 Del. Laws c. 206), substantially rewrote § 7013. It added a definition of “Heir” — “someone who obtains an interest in a manufactured home as the result of the death of another person,” including by will, intestate succession or transfer-on-death designation. It provides for automatic lease transfer to heirs who occupied the home at death, and for one year to heirs who did not, or to the estate. It bars a community owner from terminating a lease due to the death of a tenant where the estate or heirs transfer to non-tenant occupants already living in the home, allowing only the criminal-background portion of the application to be required. And it provides that a community owner “may not prohibit an heir with only a partial ownership interest… from residing in the community,” with partial occupancy not a subletting violation.3

It also bars a summary possession action for at least 90 days after the death of the tenant, and gives a defence where estate administration prevented rent payment for up to 90 days — provided heirs or the personal representative notify the community owner within 90 days with owner names, addresses, phone numbers and intended residents.

Our report on that package sets it out in full. Note the timing: those protections were in force before this decision, and they address succession specifically. They do not confer general standing on a non-titled, non-leaseholding occupant, which is what failed here.

What an occupant can actually do

Get on the paper, before there is a dispute. This is the whole practical lesson. Being added to the lot lease, or holding a recorded interest in the home, is what converts an occupant into someone the statute protects. It costs little and it is the difference between having a claim and not having one.

Where succession is the issue, use the § 7013 machinery and its clocks. The 90-day notification window is short and it is the trigger for everything else.

Note the forum. Manufactured-home possession actions run in the Justice of the Peace Court, with appeals to a three-judge panel for a full trial de novo — the route taken in a Sussex County subletting case decided in May 2026. Filing in Chancery while an eviction is running in JP Court is likely to draw the observation this court made.

Where enforcement authority does sit

Since 2025, a resident is not the only possible enforcer. SB 40, effective September 3, 2025 (85 Del. Laws c. 205), made a landlord's pattern or practice of Chapter 70 violations an unlawful practice under Delaware's consumer fraud statute, and gave the Attorney General power to petition for a receivership under § 7061 and to intervene in any such action.

For an occupant without standing, that is the realistic route: a complaint to the DOJ's Manufactured Housing Ombudsperson rather than a lawsuit of one's own. That office received 50 complaints in its most recent reporting year — 27 of them from Sussex County — and reports lot-boundary and drainage disputes as recurring themes.

What to watch next

This is a Magistrate's order granting a motion to dismiss, so it decides standing on these pleadings. No Delaware appellate decision has addressed whether a non-titled household member may invoke § 7018(b) or § 7019, and the question will recur.

Separately, Delaware's newest tenant protection may matter more here than the standing rule does: the right of redemption at the new 25 Del. C. § 5716A, in force since September 1, 2026, expressly covers a lot in a manufactured home community and runs to “the tenant” — which leaves the same identity question open in a new statute.

Related Delaware HOA Topics

← All Delaware HOA Topics

  1. Buhler v. Winterset Farms, MHC, LLC, C.A. No. 2025-1022-SEM, Order Granting Motion to Dismiss (Del. Ch. Jan. 20, 2026) (Molina, Sr. Mag.)
  2. 25 Del. C. ch. 70, subch. II — §§ 7013, 7016, 7018, 7019 (lot leases, enforcement, retaliation)
  3. 85 Del. Laws c. 206 (Senate Substitute 2 for SB 56), approved September 3, 2025 — manufactured home title transfers and heir protections

Stay on top of Delaware HOA law

Every week: new Delaware legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.