Florida HOA Fining Authority
Section 1: Overview — Fining authority in Florida
Florida splits its fining authority across two statutes, and the split matters. Section 718.303 governs condominiums; section 720.305 governs homeowners' associations. Both cap a fine at $100 per violation and $1,000 in the aggregate, and both require a hearing before an independent committee of members before the board can collect. The condominium fining power sits in section 718.303(3) of the Florida Condominium Act,1 while the planned-community power sits in section 720.305(2) of the Homeowners' Association Act.2 Under both chapters, a board may not impose a fine or suspend a use right without first giving at least 14 days' written notice and letting the owner appear before a committee of at least three members — none of them board members, association employees, or relatives of either. If that committee votes down the fine, the board cannot impose it.1 The chapters converge on that due-process framework and diverge sharply on liens: a condominium fine can never become a lien against a unit under section 718.303(3), while a homeowners' association fine of $1,000 or more can become a lien against a parcel under section 720.305(2), if the governing documents authorize it and the separate lien-and-foreclosure rules in section 720.3085 are satisfied.3 Florida rewrote both chapters in 2024 — House Bill 1203 for Chapter 720 and House Bill 1021 for Chapter 718 — and both took effect July 1, 2024, so the current statute text controls.4 The Quick-Reference table below lays out the mechanics for each chapter, with every value sourced in the detailed discussion that follows.
Section 2: Quick-Reference Fining Mechanics Table
Here's Florida's fining picture at a glance. The Condominiums column reflects Chapter 718 — section 718.303 and related sections. The Planned Communities column reflects Chapter 720 — section 720.305, section 720.3085, and related sections. The two genuinely differ, most consequentially on whether a fine can become a lien, so confirm the community type before applying any rule below. Every value in the table is sourced in the detailed discussion in Section 3.
| # | Parameter | Condominiums | Planned Communities |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Statutory fining authority | Yes (§ 718.303(3))1 | Yes (§ 720.305(2))2 |
| 2 | Controlling source | Statute (§ 718.303) and governing documents1 | Statute (§ 720.305, § 720.3085) and governing documents2,3 |
| 3 | Pre-fine notice required | Yes (§ 718.303(3)(b))1 | Yes (§ 720.305(2)(b))2 |
| 4 | Minimum notice or cure period | At least 14 days' written notice before hearing (§ 718.303(3)(b))1 | At least 14 days' written notice of right to a hearing (§ 720.305(2)(b))2 |
| 5 | Opportunity to be heard required | Yes, hearing before independent committee (§ 718.303(3)(b))1 | Yes, hearing before independent committee (§ 720.305(2)(b))2 |
| 6 | Hearing request or scheduling deadline | Not specified by statute; hearing follows the 14-day notice (§ 718.303(3)(b))1 | Hearing must be held within 90 days after issuance of notice (§ 720.305(2)(b))2 |
| 7 | Written notice of decision required | Yes; written notice by mail or hand delivery (§ 718.303(3)(b))1 | Yes; committee must give written findings within 7 days after the hearing (§ 720.305(2)(d))2 |
| 8 | Fine amount standard | "Reasonable" fines; $100 per violation, $1,000 aggregate cap (§ 718.303(3))1 | "Reasonable" fines; $100 per violation, $1,000 aggregate, unless governing documents provide otherwise (§ 720.305(2))2 |
| 9 | Per-day / continuing fines permitted | Yes, per day of a continuing violation, subject to the aggregate cap (§ 718.303(3))1 | Yes, per day of a continuing violation, subject to the aggregate cap (§ 720.305(2))2 |
| 10 | Published fine schedule required | Not specified by statute; set by governing documents1 | Not specified by statute; set by governing documents2 |
| 11 | Fines collectible as assessments | No; a fine is not a common-expense assessment and may not be liened (§ 718.303(3))1 | Restricted; a fine is not a common-expense assessment, though a fine of $1,000 or more may be liened if authorized (§ 720.305(2), § 720.3085)2,3 |
| 12 | Fines securable by association lien | No; a fine may not become a lien against a unit (§ 718.303(3))1 | Restricted; a fine of less than $1,000 may not become a lien, a fine of $1,000 or more may if governing documents authorize (§ 720.305(2))2 |
| 13 | Fines as basis for foreclosure | Prohibited; with no lien available, a fine cannot support foreclosure (§ 718.303(3))1 | Restricted; the § 720.3085 lien-foreclosure mechanism is keyed to assessments, so foreclosure on a fine-based lien is uncertain (§ 720.305(2), § 720.3085)2,3 |
| 14 | Suspension of voting or amenity rights | Yes; amenity use for a 90-day delinquency (§ 718.303(4)) and voting rights for a 90-day delinquency, plus use-right suspension for rule violations after a hearing1 | Yes; amenity use for a rule violation after a hearing (§ 720.305(2)(a)), for a 90-day delinquency (§ 720.305(3)), and voting rights for a 90-day delinquency (§ 720.305(4))2 |
| 15 | Due-process source | Statutory (§ 718.303(3)(b))1 | Statutory (§ 720.305(2)(b)-(d))2 |
The Condominiums column reflects Chapter 718 (§ 718.303); the Planned Communities column reflects Chapter 720 (§ 720.305, § 720.3085). A condominium fine may never become a lien. An HOA fine of $1,000 or more may, once the governing documents authorize it. Confirm the caps and lien rules against the current post-2024 statute text. Last verified: July 14, 2026.
Section 3: Fining mechanics in detail
3A. Source and outer limits of fining authority
Condominiums answer to the Florida Condominium Act. Section 718.303(3) grants the association power to levy reasonable fines when an owner, occupant, licensee, or invitee fails to comply with the declaration, the bylaws, or a reasonable rule.1 The statute caps that power tightly: a fine "may not exceed $100 per violation, or $1,000 in the aggregate." The board can levy a fine for each day a violation continues, after a single notice and hearing, but the aggregate cap still governs the total. And that cap doesn't bend. Section 718.303(3) gives the governing documents no room to raise it, so no condominium declaration can authorize a fine above $100 per violation or $1,000 in the aggregate.
Homeowners' associations answer to a different statute — the Homeowners' Association Act. Section 720.305(2) grants parallel authority to levy reasonable fines for the same kinds of violations: the declaration, the bylaws, or a reasonable rule. But its cap reads differently in one operative respect. The statute says a fine "may not exceed $100 per violation ... unless otherwise provided in the governing documents. A fine may be levied by the board for each day of a continuing violation ... except that the fine may not exceed $1,000 in the aggregate unless otherwise provided in the governing documents. A fine of less than $1,000 may not become a lien against a parcel."2 So the default caps mirror the condominium figures, but a Chapter 720 community can set higher per-violation or aggregate amounts if its governing documents say so. Watch that drafting difference closely — it's the first place a cross-chapter mistake creeps in.
The two chapters run parallel in structure but stand separate in text and effect — Chapter 720 doesn't incorporate Chapter 718, and neither borrows from the other. In both, the governing documents work alongside the statute: they can set lower fine limits, they must supply the substantive rules a fine enforces, and in the HOA context they can raise the aggregate cap. In the condominium context, they cannot exceed the statutory cap, full stop. Both chapters also carry new grounds-based limits. Section 720.305(7), for instance, bars an HOA from fining a homeowner for leaving garbage receptacles out within 24 hours of collection, or for certain holiday decorations.2
3B. The required fining procedure
Both chapters demand a set sequence before a fine becomes enforceable, and the independent committee sits at the center of it. Under section 718.303(3)(b), a condominium board cannot impose a fine or a suspension "unless the board first provides at least 14 days' written notice" and an opportunity for a hearing "before a committee of at least three members appointed by the board who are not officers, directors, or employees of the association, or the spouse, parent, child, brother, or sister of an officer, director, or employee."1 That committee doesn't set the fine — it only confirms or rejects what the board already levied, and if it doesn't approve by majority vote, the board cannot impose the fine. Section 720.305(2)(b) sets the same 14-day notice and the same independent-committee makeup for homeowners' associations, then goes further: the hearing must happen within 90 days of the notice, and the notice itself must describe the alleged violation, spell out the specific action that would cure it, and give the hearing date and access details.2 In both chapters, the hearing runs before the committee — never before the board alone — and a fine the committee rejects stays rejected.
Where the two chapters split is the back end of the procedure, largely a result of the 2024 amendments. For condominiums, section 718.303(3)(b) sets a short fuse: once the committee approves a fine, payment "is due 5 days after notice of the approved fine is provided."1 For homeowners' associations, House Bill 1203 rebuilt that back end entirely. The committee must issue written notice of its findings within 7 days of the hearing under section 720.305(2)(d). A violation cured before the hearing bars the fine outright under section 720.305(2)(e). And if the committee approves the fine, it must set a payment date at least 30 days after that written notice, under section 720.305(2)(f).2 Per-day fines still accrue in both chapters, subject to the $1,000 aggregate default.
The pre-suit posture differs too. Section 718.1255 sets up condominiums' mandatory-arbitration and pre-suit-mediation scheme, defining "dispute" around board authority and governance while expressly excluding disagreements that primarily involve levying or collecting a fee or assessment — so most fine-collection disputes fall outside that mandatory track.5 Section 720.311 requires pre-suit mediation for HOA covenant-enforcement disputes, but it draws the same exclusion: disputes "subject to presuit mediation ... shall not include the collection of any assessment, fine, or other financial obligation."6 The practical takeaway is direct. A fine imposed without the required 14-day notice and independent-committee approval invites a challenge, and in the HOA context, it may be voided outright.
3C. Enforcement of unpaid fines: assessments, liens, and foreclosure
This is where the two chapters split most consequentially. Section 718.303(3) states flatly: "[a] fine may not become a lien against a unit."1 A condominium fine, in other words, is never securable by the association's lien and can never be foreclosed as a fine — period. Section 720.305(2) sets a different rule for homeowners' associations: "[a] fine of less than $1,000 may not become a lien against a parcel."2 Read that against its terms and a fine of $1,000 or more can become a lien against a parcel — but only if the governing documents authorize a lien for that amount. Both the threshold and the authorization requirement matter, and swapping the condominium rule for the HOA rule, or vice versa, is the single most damaging error anyone can make reading this page.
Even a qualifying HOA fine doesn't foreclose automatically. Section 720.3085 builds the association's lien-and-foreclosure machinery around unpaid assessments and the "other amounts" the section provides for, and its foreclosure procedure, notice requirements, and payment-application rules are all keyed to assessments.3 Whether a fine-based lien of $1,000 or more can actually support a foreclosure — as opposed to merely attaching once authorized — depends on the governing documents and on how section 720.3085 gets applied. It is not a settled, mechanical right. Treat fine foreclosure as legally uncertain, and get counsel involved before attempting it.
Because condominium fines can't be liened, associations chase unpaid condominium fines through other means — a civil action on the debt, often in small claims court, backed by Chapter 718's prevailing-party fee provisions, plus suspension of use rights where authorized. Suspension tools exist in both chapters. A condominium can suspend common-element and amenity use, and voting rights, once an owner runs more than 90 days delinquent on a monetary obligation under section 718.303(4), and it can suspend use rights for rule violations after the hearing process.1 An HOA can suspend common-area use for a rule violation after a hearing under section 720.305(2)(a), and it can suspend amenity use and voting rights for a delinquency running past 90 days under section 720.305(3) and (4).2 Delinquency-based suspensions skip the committee hearing, but they still carry their own notice requirements — and in the HOA setting, boards cannot cut off ingress, egress, or parking.
Section 4: Recent legislative and judicial activity
A. Recent bills
Florida didn't sit still in the last two legislative cycles. Lawmakers rewrote the fining procedure for homeowners' associations, expanded regulatory reach over condominium fine records, and passed one more condominium bill that left the fining rules themselves untouched.
HB 1203 · Ch. 2024-221 · 2024 Regular Session
House Bill 1203, now Chapter 2024-221, rewrote the HOA fining procedure in section 720.305. It requires the independent committee to issue written findings within 7 days of the hearing, bars a fine for any violation cured before the hearing, sets the payment date at least 30 days after that written notice, and limits when attorney fees and costs can accrue against an owner.[7]
| Property managers | Rebuild your HOA fining workflow so committee findings go out in writing within 7 days and the payment date lands at least 30 days out. |
| HOA board members | The board still levies the fine, but the independent committee must approve it, and a violation cured before the hearing cannot be fined even if already scheduled. |
| Community association attorneys | Section 720.305's new subsections hand both sides fresh procedural grounds to attack or defend a fine — audit every step for compliance. |
| Homeowners | You now get a written record of the committee's decision and a firm payment deadline, plus protection if you cure the violation before the hearing. |
HB 1021 · Ch. 2024-244 · 2024 Regular Session
House Bill 1021, now Chapter 2024-244, overhauled the Condominium Act. It left the section 718.303 fine caps and the committee requirement untouched, but it expanded the jurisdiction of the Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, and Mobile Homes — after turnover, the Division can now reach financial procedures and records, fines included — and it now requires director education that covers the levying of fines.[8]
| Property managers | Condominium fining records now sit within expanded Division oversight — keep your documentation and recordkeeping complete. |
| HOA board members | Directors must complete education covering fining procedures, and fine-related records are now subject to Division review. |
| Community association attorneys | The Division's broader jurisdiction over fine-related financial records opens a regulatory channel alongside civil litigation. |
| Homeowners | You now have a state regulator with clearer authority over condominium fine records and financial procedures. |
HB 913 · 2025 Regular Session
House Bill 913 amended the Condominium Act on manager licensing, structural reserves, and Division reporting. It left the section 718.303 fine caps, the independent-committee requirement, and the fine-lien rule exactly as they stood.[9]
| Property managers | Your fining workflow doesn't change — HB 913 touches licensing and reserves, not the fine caps or the committee process. |
| HOA board members | Keep following the existing section 718.303 procedure for condominium fines; this bill didn't alter it. |
| Community association attorneys | No new procedural grounds here — fine caps and the fine-lien bar stay intact, though the manager-licensing changes are worth tracking separately. |
| Homeowners | The rules for how your condominium can fine you stayed the same under this bill. |
B. Recent appellate rulings
Florida's appellate courts have stayed close to procedure this cycle rather than rewriting substance — one ruling on when a homeowner can go to court over a contested fine, another on a different track of covenant enforcement that happens to run through the same statute.
Pirman v. South Pointe of Tampa Homeowners Association
In Pirman, 370 So. 3d 701 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023), the court held that a homeowner can sue to challenge and rescind improperly imposed fines without paying them first, because section 720.305(1) lets a member sue "at law or in equity, or both" — and it reversed summary judgment for the association. The opinion recites section 720.305(2)(b)'s 14-day notice and independent-committee requirements, but it never reached whether the association's notice was actually defective.[10]
| Property managers | An owner can litigate a contested fine before paying it, so keep a defensible paper trail on notice and committee approval. |
| HOA board members | Improperly imposed fines can be attacked in court even while unpaid — that raises the cost of any procedural shortcut. |
| Community association attorneys | Pirman confirms a member's standing to seek rescission of fines, and it points to Chapter 720's remedy language as the basis. |
| Homeowners | You don't have to pay a questionable fine first to get into court and challenge it. |
Mooney v. Color Le Palais of Boynton Beach Homeowners Association
The most-publicized recent HOA appellate decision, Mooney addresses injunctive enforcement of restrictive covenants and self-help under section 720.305(1), and it certifies conflict with other districts. It does not, however, touch fines, the fining committee, or the fine-lien rule.[11]
| Property managers | Mooney doesn't change your fining procedure — it governs injunctive covenant enforcement and self-help, a separate track from fines. |
| HOA board members | Nothing here alters how you levy or collect a fine, but the certified conflict on self-help is worth watching if your association considers non-fine enforcement tools. |
| Community association attorneys | Track this case for its certified conflict on self-help remedies, not for anything bearing on the fine caps or the committee process. |
| Homeowners | This ruling doesn't affect the fines you may face; it deals with a different kind of covenant enforcement. |
No qualifying condominium fining decision — a case interpreting section 718.303 — reached a District Court of Appeal or the Florida Supreme Court within the past 36 months. Trial-level fining disputes still run through Florida's circuit and county courts, with appeals landing at the District Courts of Appeal, including the Sixth District Court of Appeal, created effective January 1, 2023 to cover the Ninth, Tenth, and Twentieth circuits, and discretionary review available at the Florida Supreme Court.12
C. Active legislative debates
House Bill 657 (2026) cleared the Florida House by a lopsided 108-2 vote on March 5, 2026, then died in the Senate when the session closed on March 13, 2026. It would have created a Community Associations Court and imposed civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation against board members who don't comply. Its sponsor, Representative Juan Porras, says he plans to refile it in the 2027 session.13
Section 5: National positioning and related coverage
Step back, and Florida fits a two-statute pattern, like Arizona — condominiums and planned communities stay under separate acts rather than converging into one code. Florida pairs that split structure with specific dollar caps and a distinctive requirement: fines must clear an independent committee of non-board members before they stick. That's a different model from single-statute California, where a monetary penalty imposed as discipline "may not be characterized nor treated in the governing documents as an assessment that may become a lien" enforceable by sale of the owner's interest, under California Civil Code section 5725(b). It's different again from the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act states — Alaska, Connecticut, Colorado — which follow a more uniform, code-based framework.14 Because Chapter 718 and Chapter 720 genuinely diverge, confirm the community type before applying any Florida fining rule. The fine-lien split defines Florida enforcement: condominium owners carry more protection, since a condominium fine can never become a lien, while HOA parcels face a possible lien once a fine reaches $1,000 and the governing documents allow it — subject to the section 720.3085 foreclosure analysis.
HOA Weekly updates this coverage quarterly as the Legislature and the Florida courts act, with particular attention to how the 2024 reforms play out. Federal law applies here too, regardless of what Florida's own statutes say — notably the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which can reach third-party collection of fines, along with the Fair Housing Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, and the rules governing satellite dishes and antennas.
- Fla. Stat. § 718.303 (2025), Obligations of owners and occupants; remedies (The Florida Senate) ↩
- Fla. Stat. § 720.305 (2025), Obligations of members; remedies at law or in equity; levy of fines and suspension of use rights (The Florida Senate) ↩
- Fla. Stat. § 720.3085 (2025), Payment for assessments; lien claims (The Florida Senate) ↩
- CS/CS/HB 1203 (2024), Homeowners' Associations, Ch. 2024-221, eff. July 1, 2024 (The Florida Senate); CS/CS/CS/HB 1021 (2024), Community Associations, Ch. 2024-244, eff. July 1, 2024 (The Florida Senate) ↩
- Fla. Stat. § 718.1255 (2025), Alternative dispute resolution; mediation; nonbinding arbitration; applicability (The Florida Senate) ↩
- Fla. Stat. § 720.311 (2025), Dispute resolution (The Florida Senate) ↩
- CS/CS/HB 1203 (2024), Homeowners' Associations, Ch. 2024-221 (The Florida Senate); see History note to Fla. Stat. § 720.305 (2025), "s. 7, ch. 2024-221" ↩
- HB 1021 (2024) Bill Summary, Ch. 2024-244 (The Florida Senate) ↩
- HB 913 (2025), Condominium and Cooperative Associations (The Florida Senate) ↩
- Pirman v. South Pointe of Tampa Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., 370 So. 3d 701 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023), Case No. 2D23-58 (Florida Second District Court of Appeal) ↩
- Mooney v. Color Le Palais of Boynton Beach Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., Case Nos. 4D2024-0967 & 4D2024-2082 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 27, 2025) (Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal) ↩
- Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal (created eff. Jan. 1, 2023; Ninth, Tenth, and Twentieth circuits) (flcourts.gov) ↩
- HB 657 (2026), Homeowners' Associations (The Florida Senate) ↩
- Cal. Civ. Code § 5725(b) (California Legislative Information) ↩