Maryland HOA Budget Approval
Section 1: Overview — How HOA budgets are approved in Maryland
In Maryland, a homeowners' association does not approve its budget by asking owners to vote it up or down. The board adopts the budget, and the budget takes effect. Two statutes set that pattern. The Maryland Condominium Act, Real Property Title 11, governs condominium budgets; the Maryland Homeowners Association Act, Real Property Title 11B, governs planned-community budgets. And one obligation now drives both: a phased mandate that requires associations to study their reserves and fund them.1,2
Under each statute the steps run the same way. The governing body — the council of unit owners or its board for a condominium, the board of directors for a homeowners association — prepares a proposed budget, sends it to owners before adoption, and adopts it at an open meeting. Maryland uses no owner ratification vote and no UCIOA-style negative-option rejection.1,2 The reserve-study and funding requirement phased in county by county and now covers the whole state. It reaches condominiums and homeowners associations alike, and it requires the budget to fund reserves at the level the most recent study recommends; read the figures, the phase-in, and the effective dates below against the current Maryland Code.3,4
Cooperatives travel a separate track. Cooperative housing corporations follow the Maryland Cooperative Housing Corporation Act, Corporations and Associations § 5-6B-01 et seq., which carries parallel reserve provisions.5 Maryland has not adopted the Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act. It keeps two comprehensive statutes plus the cooperative track, and its reserve-funding regime is recent and still changing. The quick-reference table and the per-statute sequence that follow lay out the mechanics, with reserves built in as part of the budget.
Section 2: The budget approval mechanism
2A. Quick-Reference Budget Mechanics Table
This table reflects the Maryland Condominium Act (Title 11) and the Maryland Homeowners Association Act (Title 11B). Cooperatives follow a separate statute (Corporations and Associations § 5-6B-26.1) and appear in 2C. The reserve rows reflect the phased reserve-study and reserve-funding mandate as it stands after the 2025 amendments.
| Parameter | Condominiums (Title 11) | Homeowners associations (Title 11B) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Governing statute section(s) | Real Property §§ 11-109.2 (budget), 11-109.4 (reserve study), 11-110 (assessments)1,3,6 | Real Property §§ 11B-112.2 (budget), 11B-112.3 (reserve study)2,4 |
| 2. Community types covered | Residential condominiums governed by a council of unit owners; the budget section does not reach a condominium used solely for nonresidential purposes1 | Homeowners associations responsible under their declaration for maintaining and repairing common areas2 |
| 3. Body that adopts the proposed budget | The council of unit owners, or the body it delegates the job to (typically the board of directors)1 | The board of directors or other governing body, or a body the association delegates the job to2 |
| 4. Approval model | The council adopts at an open meeting after sending owners the proposed budget; no owner ratification or negative-option vote1 | The board adopts at an open meeting after sending lot owners the proposed budget; no owner ratification or negative-option vote2 |
| 5. Budget summary distribution deadline | Proposed budget to unit owners at least 30 days before adoption; adopted budget to unit owners no more than 30 days after the adoption meeting1 | Proposed budget to lot owners at least 30 days before adoption; adopted budget no more than 30 days after the adoption meeting2 |
| 6. Ratification meeting notice window | Not a ratification model. A mid-year expenditure raising assessments more than 15% over the adopted budget needs a budget amendment at a special meeting on at least 10 days' written notice1 | Not a ratification model. Notice of the budget meeting goes to each lot owner; a 15% mid-year amendment needs a special meeting on at least 10 days' notice2 |
| 7. Owner rejection threshold | Not specified by statute; Maryland uses no owner-rejection or negative-option mechanism1 | Not specified by statute; Maryland uses no owner-rejection or negative-option mechanism2 |
| 8. Quorum required to ratify | Not applicable; there is no budget ratification vote. The general council quorum is 25% of total votes unless the bylaws say otherwise1 | Not specified by statute; governed by the recorded declaration |
| 9. Effect of owner rejection | Not applicable; no statutory owner-rejection mechanism1 | Not applicable; no statutory owner-rejection mechanism2 |
| 10. Statutory cap on assessment increase absent owner vote | No statutory percentage cap. A mid-year expenditure raising assessments more than 15% over the adopted budget needs a special-meeting amendment; the board may raise the assessment to fund the reserve amount despite any declaration or bylaw cap6 | No statutory percentage cap; the 15% mid-year amendment rule applies2 |
| 11. Special assessment approval threshold | Not set by statute as a fixed percentage; governed by the recorded declaration or bylaws (the 15% mid-year amendment rule applies to expenditures)1 | Not specified by statute; governed by the recorded declaration |
| 12. Reserve study mandate (and frequency) | Required for residential condominiums; updated at least every 5 years3 | Required where the association maintains common areas with a total repair or replacement cost of at least $10,000; every 5 years4 |
| 13. Reserve funding mandate | Budget reserves must equal the amount the most recent study recommends and be deposited by the last day of each fiscal year; initial-study funding level reached within 5 fiscal years1,7 | Same standard; initial-study funding level reached within 5 fiscal years2,7 |
| 14. Audit or financial review tied to budget cycle | Not specified by statute; no statutory independent-audit mandate. The reserve study must be reviewed during budget preparation and summarized to owners with the proposed budget3 | Not specified by statute; no statutory independent-audit mandate. The reserve study must be reviewed during budget preparation and summarized to owners with the proposed budget4 |
| 15. Provisions variable by declaration | Quorum, special-assessment thresholds, late charges, and assessment allocation may vary by declaration or bylaws; reserve-study and funding requirements are mandatory floors3 | Special-assessment thresholds and related governance may vary by declaration; reserve-study and funding requirements are mandatory floors4 |
2B. The budget and reserve sequence under each statute
Start with a condominium. Real Property § 11-109.2 sets the sequence. The council of unit owners has a proposed annual budget prepared and submitted to the unit owners at least 30 days before adoption.1 That budget must provide for income, administration, maintenance, utilities, general expenses, reserves, and capital items.1 The council — or the body it delegates the job to — adopts the budget at an open meeting, and it must send the adopted budget to the unit owners no more than 30 days after the adoption meeting, by electronic transmission, by posting on the association home page, or in the newsletter.1 There is no owner ratification step and no petition-driven rejection right; the council's adoption is the operative act. One guardrail applies during the year: an expenditure that would push assessments more than 15% above the previously adopted budget — unless it answers a health-or-safety threat or a significant risk of damage — needs a budget amendment adopted at a special meeting on at least 10 days' written notice.1
A planned community follows the same shape. Under Real Property § 11B-112.2, the board of directors has a proposed budget prepared and submitted to lot owners at least 30 days before adoption; notice of the meeting where the board will consider the budget goes to every lot owner; the board adopts the budget at an open meeting; and the adopted budget reaches lot owners no more than 30 days after adoption.2 The 15% mid-year amendment rule and the 10-day special-meeting notice work the same way.2 Neither statute imposes a UCIOA negative-option, and the day-counts match: 30 days before adoption for the proposal, 30 days after for the adopted budget.
Reserves now drive both budgets. Under § 11-109.4 for condominiums and § 11B-112.3 for homeowners associations, a covered community must obtain an independent reserve study from a qualified professional and update it at least every five years.3,4 The funding obligation lives in the budget sections: the reserves in the annual budget must equal the amount the most recent study recommends, and the association must deposit them in the reserve account on or before the last day of each fiscal year.1,2 When the most recent study is an initial study, the governing body has to reach the recommended annual funding level within five fiscal years after the year the study was completed; the 2025 amendment — House Bill 292 and Senate Bill 63 — stretched that window from three fiscal years to five for condominiums, homeowners associations, and cooperatives.7 The 2025 law also requires the governing body to develop a written funding plan, working with the study's preparer and choosing a recognized funding method, and it allows a two-thirds financial-hardship deviation for up to one fiscal year, renewable by another two-thirds vote.7 The phase-in for the initial study depends on county and creation date: communities created before October 1, 2022 outside Prince George's and Montgomery Counties that had not obtained a study since October 1, 2018 had to complete one by October 1, 2023 — the two pioneer counties faced earlier dates — and every five years after that.3,4 Adopting the budget is not the same as levying the assessment that funds it, or enforcing a lien for nonpayment; lien mechanics run through the Maryland Contract Lien Act.8
2C. Cooperatives, variation, and the corporate-law overlay
Cooperative housing corporations answer to the Maryland Cooperative Housing Corporation Act, and the reserve study, the funding plan, the hardship provision, and the five-year initial-funding window all mirror the condominium and HOA tracks under Corporations and Associations § 5-6B-26.1.5,7 Within each statute, the budget distribution day-counts, the open-meeting adoption requirement, and the reserve-study and reserve-funding obligations are mandatory. They form the statutory floor, and a declaration cannot waive them.3,4 Other items — quorum levels, special-assessment thresholds, late charges, and assessment allocation — are left to the recorded declaration or bylaws.1 Many Maryland associations are also incorporated as nonprofit or non-stock corporations under the Corporations and Associations Article. That article supplies corporate formalities such as director duties and meeting procedure, but it sets no budget-approval threshold; the budget rules come from Title 11 or Title 11B, not from the corporate charter.
Section 3: Budget-adjacent obligations
A. Reserves in the budget
The reserve-study and funding mandate is the highest-stakes budget obligation in Maryland, and it applies under both statutes. For condominiums, § 11-109.4 requires a reserve study for residential condominiums, updated at least every five years, and § 11-109.2 requires the budget to fund the amount the study recommends, deposited by fiscal year-end, with the initial-study level reached within five fiscal years.1,3 For homeowners associations, § 11B-112.3 imposes the study requirement wherever the association maintains common areas whose total repair or replacement cost runs to at least $10,000, and § 11B-112.2 carries the matching funding obligation.2,4 The study must be available for inspection, reviewed as part of budget preparation, and summarized for owners with the proposed budget; the 2025 law adds the written funding plan and the hardship provisions.4,7 These are mandatory floors.
B. Special assessments
Neither statute sets a fixed percentage threshold for owner approval of a special assessment; approval, and any owner-vote requirement, comes from the recorded declaration or bylaws.1,2 What the statutes do impose is the 15% rule: a mid-year expenditure that would raise assessments more than 15% above the adopted budget needs a budget amendment adopted at a special meeting on at least 10 days' notice, under § 11-109.2(e) for condominiums and § 11B-112.2(f) for homeowners associations.1,2
C. Assessment increase limits
Neither statute caps regular assessment increases by a percentage; Maryland's principal budget constraint is the reserve-funding obligation, not a ceiling.1,2 The Condominium Act pushes further in the reserve direction. Section 11-110(b)(1)(ii) lets a residential condominium board raise the assessment to cover the reserve funding amount, notwithstanding any declaration, articles, or bylaw provision that restricts or caps assessment increases.6 House Bill 107 extended comparable cap-override authority to homeowners associations and cooperatives.9
D. Financial review, audit, and disclosure
Neither Title 11 nor Title 11B requires an independent audit tied to the budget cycle. The statutory financial-disclosure duty that touches the budget is the reserve-study review and summary: under § 11-109.4(e) and § 11B-112.3(e), the association must review the study during budget preparation and summarize it to owners with the proposed budget, and its books and records stay available for owner inspection.3,4 Any audit requirement comes from the declaration or bylaws, not the statutes.
Section 4: Recent legislative and judicial activity
A. Recent bills
Two measures built Maryland's current reserve framework, and both are now law.
HB 107 · Chapter 664 · 2022 Regular Session
This is the anchor measure. It took the reserve-study requirement that once applied only in Prince George's and Montgomery Counties and extended it across the entire state. In doing so it amended the Condominium Act (§§ 11-109, 11-109.2, 11-109.4, 11-110), the Homeowners Association Act (§§ 11B-106.1, 11B-112.2, 11B-112.3, 11B-117), and the Cooperative Housing Corporation Act (§ 5-6B-26.1).9
| Property managers | Make sure every condominium and qualifying HOA you manage has a current reserve study and stays on the five-year update cycle. |
| HOA board members | Treat a missing or stale study as a fiduciary exposure, not a chore you can put off. |
| Community association attorneys | The statute overrides declaration caps on reserve-driven assessment increases, which narrows a common defense to fee hikes. |
| Homeowners | Expect your assessments to cover the long-term repairs the community used to put off. |
HB 292 / SB 63 · Chapter 519/518 · 2025 Regular Session
This measure turned Maryland's disclosure-oriented framework into a funding mandate. It requires the budget to carry reserves at the level the most recent study recommends, requires the association to deposit those funds by the last day of each fiscal year, stretches the initial-study funding window from three fiscal years to five, calls for a written funding plan developed with the study's preparer, and adds a two-thirds financial-hardship deviation.7
| Property managers | Build the funding plan and the fiscal year-end deposit into the budget calendar for every covered community. |
| HOA board members | Your board now picks a funding method and records any hardship deviation by a two-thirds vote. |
| Community association attorneys | Tell boards the five-year initial window and the hardship process are the current standard — the old three-year figure no longer controls. |
| Homeowners | The extra two years soften the phase-in, but they do not erase the duty to reach the recommended funding level. |
B. Recent appellate rulings
No reported decision in the past 36 months squarely construes the budget or reserve-funding mechanics of Title 11 or Title 11B. The regime is recent, and it has not yet produced reported appellate construction. Maryland also renamed its high courts in 2022 — the Appellate Court of Maryland was the Court of Special Appeals, and the Supreme Court of Maryland was the Court of Appeals.10 One assessment decision still comes close enough to note.
Logan v. Dietz
This is the closest the courts have come to the budget question, and it is really about who the HOA Act covers. A small Ocean City development ran under a self-executing declaration. The Appellate Court of Maryland held that the development was not subject to the Homeowners Association Act, and that a pro rata common-area contribution was not a "mandatory fee" that triggers the Act. The result: a minority of owners could not use § 11B-116 to amend the declaration.11
| Property managers | Whether the HOA Act and its budget rules apply can turn on the declaration's language, not on how the community has informally operated. |
| HOA board members | Confirm the community is actually a statutory HOA before you lean on Title 11B budget powers. |
| Community association attorneys | Treat "mandatory fee" status as a threshold question, both for HOA Act coverage and for less-than-unanimous declaration amendments. |
| Homeowners | Sharing costs under an old declaration does not by itself make your community a statutory HOA. |
C. Active legislative debates
The General Assembly keeps working on community-association measures. One to watch is House Bill 956 (2026). According to the Maryland General Assembly's bill summary, it would require "the Department of Housing and Community and Development to conduct a study on buildings in the State that are more than 40 years old and contain a condominium; and requiring the Department to report its findings to the General Assembly on or before December 1, 2026" — a subject that sits right next to reserve and structural-funding policy.9
Section 5: National positioning and related coverage
Maryland belongs to a growing group of states that require both a reserve study and reserve funding. California reaches the same place through the Davis-Stirling Act, Civil Code § 5550, which calls for a reserve study whenever "the current replacement value of the major components is equal to or greater than one-half of the gross budget," at least "once every three years," reviewed annually. Florida moved after tragedy: Senate Bill 4-D, the Building Safety Act, signed May 26, 2022 in the wake of the June 24, 2021 Champlain Towers South collapse, mandates Structural Integrity Reserve Studies for condominium and cooperative buildings three or more stories tall, and under Fla. Stat. § 718.112(2)(g)(2) it bars associations from waiving structural-component reserves for budgets adopted on or after December 31, 2024. Hawaii sets its own floor: the Condominium Property Act, HRS § 514B-148(b), requires associations to "assess the unit owners to either fund a minimum of fifty per cent of the estimated replacement reserves or fund one hundred per cent of the estimated replacement reserves when using a cash flow plan." Maryland stands apart from the UCIOA negative-option budget family on one side and from states with no reserve requirement at all on the other.12
What sets Maryland apart is the route it takes. It reaches the mandate through two separate statutes plus a cooperative track, not a single unified code. So a multi-state operator has to apply Title 11 to condominiums and Title 11B to planned communities, and confirm the $10,000 threshold for the latter. For anyone with Maryland exposure, the practical point is the same: reserve studies and phased funding now drive the budget across both condominiums and homeowners associations. The reserve number sets the floor for the assessment, and the board can raise the assessment to meet it.
HOA Weekly's Maryland Budget Approval coverage updates quarterly as the General Assembly and the Maryland courts act, and the reserve rules in particular are re-verified each quarter because they remain the most actively amended part of the framework. Federal frameworks — FHA, ADA, FDCPA, SCRA, and OTARD — apply to Maryland associations no matter what the state budget framework says.
- Md. Code, Real Property § 11-109.2 (Annual Proposed Budget), Maryland General Assembly ↩
- Md. Code, Real Property § 11B-112.2 (Annual Budget), Maryland General Assembly ↩
- Md. Code, Real Property § 11-109.4 (Reserve Study of Condominium Common Elements), Maryland General Assembly ↩
- Md. Code, Real Property § 11B-112.3 (Reserve Study of Homeowners Association Common Areas), Maryland General Assembly ↩
- Md. Code, Corporations & Associations § 5-6B-26.1 (Reserve Study of Cooperative Housing Corporation), Maryland General Assembly ↩
- Md. Code, Real Property § 11-110 (Common Expenses and Profits; Assessments; Liens), 2025 Maryland Code ↩
- Senate Bill 63 (2025), Cooperative Housing Corporations, Condominiums, and Homeowners Associations – Funding of Reserve Accounts and Preparation of Funding Plans, enrolled text, Maryland General Assembly; cross-filed with House Bill 292, effective October 1, 2025 ↩
- Md. Code, Real Property § 14-203 (Maryland Contract Lien Act), Maryland General Assembly ↩
- House Bill 107 (2022), Chapter 664, Reserve Studies, Maryland General Assembly; see also House Bill 956 (2026), Maryland General Assembly ↩
- Voter-approved constitutional change renames high courts to Supreme Court of Maryland and Appellate Court of Maryland (Dec. 14, 2022), Maryland Courts ↩
- Logan v. Dietz, Appellate Court of Maryland, No. 1761, Sept. Term 2021, reported at 258 Md. App. 629 (2023) ↩
- Reserve Requirements and Funding for Community Associations, Community Associations Institute (state comparison: California Civil Code § 5550; Florida Senate Bill 4-D and Fla. Stat. § 718.112(2)(g)(2); Hawaii HRS § 514B-148(b)) ↩