We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Your master policy deductible is now $250,000. Who pays it is genuinely unsettled.

Your master policy deductible is now $250,000. Who pays it is genuinely unsettled.
New York · Compliance

Your master policy deductible is now $250,000. Who pays it is genuinely unsettled.

The hardest governance question facing New York condominium and cooperative boards this year has no statute behind it, no case law, and no consensus among the lawyers and brokers who advise on it. It is this: when a unit owner's overflowing bath produces a $200,000 claim, and the master policy carries a $250,000 water-damage deductible, who pays?

Historically the answer was the building. The deductible came out of the operating budget, which means it came out of everybody's maintenance or common charges. That answer is now being challenged, because the deductibles have moved far enough to make it untenable.

The numbers, as reported

Habitat Magazine reported in August 2026 that New York deductibles now run to $100,000 and $250,000 for water damage, with $10,000 or $25,000 per-unit deductibles appearing; one Manhattan high-rise condominium case study sat at $10,000 to $15,000 per unit.1

At $250,000, absorbing the deductible on a routine water loss is a special assessment. At $25,000 per unit, it is a number a single owner can be asked to carry.

The people who advise New York boards do not agree

This is why we are grading it unresolved rather than reporting a rule. Two named professionals quoted in the same article take opposite positions.

Sophie Bird, Senior Vice President for Commercial Lines at IMA Financial Group, on shifting the deductible to the owner who caused the loss: “I don't know if I'd want to live in a building like that. It might create a contentious atmosphere.

Jillian Menna, in-house attorney at Genatt V Insurance Solutions and Of Counsel to Braverman Greenspun: “I don't think co-ops and condos should transfer the responsibility of a property-policy deductible to the unit-owner.

The article cites no statute and no case law, because there is none. This is a policy fight being conducted through board resolutions, and the question of whether a New York board may allocate a master-policy deductible to an individual owner — and on what authority — has not been answered by a New York court that we could find.

Why the deductibles moved

Because the market did. FirstService Residential's New York insurance update reported general increases of 20% or more, with buildings pushed out of preferred programmes seeing 50% to 200%.2

✓ Your New York State Pass is active — the full analysis below is unlocked

The market, in the words of the people placing the coverage

Leonor Vivona, Vice President at FS Insurance Brokers: “We're in a hard market – 20%-plus premium increases, fewer carriers offering coverage, and more rigorous underwriting.

Sean Kent, Senior Vice President: “Anything that you can do to prevent or mitigate water damage claims is going to be really impactful.

Shalamar Clarke, Insurance Manager: “Document everything. Take videos, photos, preserve receipts, and keep the damaged property until the adjuster arrives.

And on why New York specifically is priced the way it is, Jillian Menna, General Counsel at Genatt Insurance Solutions, on the construction-liability regime: “Under the law, if there is an injury and the condo or co-op is sued, you are 100% responsible.” The reference is to Labor Law § 240, New York's scaffolding law, which imposes strict liability — and which is one reason a New York association doing facade work pays more than an identical building elsewhere.

The excess and umbrella layer is where the repricing is brutal

The figure that best illustrates it, from Habitat's June 2026 reporting: what used to buy $100 million of umbrella coverage for about $3,000 now buys $25 million for about $25,000.3

Renée A. McFadden of Distinguished: “Twenty years ago, we would sell an umbrella [policy] for pennies on the dollar. But more and more we're seeing claims that are piercing the umbrella...

The cause attributed is rising jury awards and liability settlements, particularly trip-and-fall claims. The mitigation advised is concrete and within a board's control: clear outstanding DOB and HPD violations, install CCTV, maintain sidewalks, and get the risk transfer right in contractor agreements with proper additional-insured and hold-harmless provisions. Our New York insurance requirements page covers the coverage stack.

One New York board solved this through its governing documents

This is the most useful thing in the reporting, because it is a route that does not require deciding the unsettled question at all.

An Upper West Side condominium built in 2010 had three major water-damage claims in four years, the largest $60,000. It was pushed into the non-admitted market and its premium tripled from $50,000 to $130,000.4

The diagnosis was in the declaration rather than the plumbing. Sophie Bird found that the governing documents made the association responsible for repairing original unit floors — and because few owners had renovated, the building was absorbing nearly every water claim in the building.

The fix was a supermajority vote to amend the bylaws, shifting floor-repair responsibility to unit owners and their own HO-6 policies. First-year premium reduction: $15,000.

Bird: “We helped the board make the case that bringing down the number of claims would bring down premiums, which would result in significant savings over the years.

Note what that board did and did not do. It did not decide who pays a deductible. It changed which losses are the association's at all — which is a question the declaration answers, which a board can amend by the ordinary route, and which does not require any new legal theory.

What New York law does say about who repairs what

The courts have been mapping this, and two 2026 decisions are worth a board's attention.

On limited common elements, the First Department held that where balconies “are defined in the governing documents as 'Residential Limited Common Element[s]' and are part of the broader common elements of the building,” the condominium owns them, so a defect claim is derivative rather than individual — and a unit owner “lacks standing to bring a claim alleging injury due to a common element.” It also drew the ordinary/extraordinary maintenance line the bylaws set up as the live factual question.5

On access to make a repair, the First Department granted summary judgment to a co-op declaring that under the proprietary lease a shareholder had to repair a shower-pan leak or grant access “at her own expense,” and held that “the determination as to the manner and extent of repairs is generally protected by the business judgment rule” — notwithstanding a city-agency inspection that found no leak.6

So: the declaration and proprietary lease decide whose repair it is, and the board's judgment about how to do it is protected. What neither decision addresses is the deductible.

Where a board stands while the question is open

Read the declaration before the renewal, not after the loss. The Upper West Side building's problem was a repair-responsibility clause nobody had connected to the loss run. Ask the broker which categories of loss are driving the claims, then ask counsel whether the governing documents make those the association's responsibility at all.

Do not adopt a deductible-shifting resolution without advice. It is not settled that a New York board can do it, the professionals advising boards disagree about whether it should, and a resolution that reallocates a cost the declaration assigns to the association is the kind of act that gets challenged. If a board wants owners to bear these losses, amending the document is the defensible route and a resolution is not.

Require and verify HO-6 coverage at the deductible level. This is the quiet piece that protects everyone. Fannie Mae now independently requires a unit owner's HO-6 policy to be at least equal to the master policy's per-unit deductible where one exists — so a board that is raising its deductible has both a reason and a lever to require matching owner coverage.

Our budget approval page covers the premium line, our reserve studies page covers why an absorbed deductible is a reserve problem, and our governing statute page covers the amendment route.

One note on sourcing. The coastal and residual-market angle — carriers withdrawing from coastal New York, rising demand at the New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association — is something we could not source properly. NYPIUA and the Coastal Markets Assistance Program are oriented to individual units and small dwellings, and we found nothing indicating NYPIUA writes association master policies. We are not going to imply otherwise.

Related New York HOA Topics

← All New York HOA Topics

  1. Habitat Magazine, August 31, 2026 — the controversy over shifting the master-policy deductible to unit owners
  2. FirstService Residential New York 2026 insurance update, November 17, 2025 — premium increases and the named brokers quoted
  3. Habitat Magazine, June 9, 2026 — the hard market and the repricing of umbrella and excess coverage
  4. Habitat Magazine, March 6, 2026 — the Upper West Side condominium that amended its bylaws to shift floor-repair responsibility
  5. Etkin v Sherwood Residential Management LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 01301 (1st Dept, March 10, 2026) — limited common elements and derivative standing
  6. Castle Village Owners Corp. v Girardi, 2026 NY Slip Op 01153 (1st Dept, March 3, 2026) — access for repair at the shareholder’s expense and the business judgment rule

Stay on top of New York HOA law

Every week: new New York legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.