Rhode Island told insurers they cannot drop a homeowner over a blurry roof photo
Rhode Island told insurers they cannot drop a homeowner over a blurry roof photo
2026-09-15 · Rhode Island · Regulation
Rhode Island's insurance regulator has told carriers that a satellite photograph of a roof is not, by itself, a reason to drop a policy — and that the rule follows the imagery into the vendors' scoring products.
Insurance Bulletin Number 2025-3, “Aerial Imagery Used by Homeowners Insurers”, was issued August 18, 2025 by Elizabeth Kelleher Dwyer, Superintendent of Insurance, at the Department of Business Regulation's Insurance Division. It applies, in its own words, “to the initial consideration of risks, the tiering of risks, and the non-renewal of policies using aerial imagery as well as the determination of causes and amounts of loss.”1
Why it was issued
“The Department is aware that some insurers are non-renewing or refusing to write Rhode Island homeowners insurance policies based on property characteristics identified through aerial imaging.”
The standards
Currency, with a number. “Images used to evaluate a property risk must provide a clear, accurate, and current (less than 15 months old) view of the property.”
Quality. “Images of insured property that are low-resolution, out-of-focus, blurry, or not current do not provide an accurate and clear representation of the property, and thus cannot alone justify a cancellation or nonrenewal based on the condition of the property without further investigation into the condition of the property.”
Cosmetic damage is not enough. “[A]erial images of a roof that show only cosmetic damage such as streaking or discoloration without functional or structural damage are not sufficient to independently support cancellation or nonrenewal based on roof degradation, as cosmetic damage alone is not reason to justify these actions. To justify underwriting action, there must be clear evidence of significant material degradation or damage that increases the risk of loss.”
And the consequence of ignoring it. “It is the Department's position that failure to follow these guidelines may constitute an unfair trade practice under R.I. Gen Laws Chapter 27-29 Unfair Competition and Practices.”
The vendor clause, which is the sharpest line in the bulletin
“Lastly, the Department reminds insurers that this bulletin applies to not only their direct use of aerial imagery, but also the use of any third-party roof scores or similar mechanism that leverage aerial imagery to generate the information provided to the insurer.”
That closes the obvious route around the rule. An insurer that does not look at an image, but buys a roof score derived from one, is inside the bulletin.
Claims, not just underwriting
The same standards apply to settlement, under a different statute:
“If aerial or satellite imagery is used in the settlement of a claim, those images must provide a clear, accurate, and current view of the property. Images of insured property that are low-resolution, out-of-focus, blurry, or not current do not provide an accurate and clear representation of the property, and thus cannot alone be used to determine a claim settlement or denial. Failure to follow these standards may constitute a violation of R.I. Gen Laws Chapter 9.1 Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act.”
What the bulletin only encourages
Four practices are framed as best practice rather than requirement, and the difference matters to a homeowner. Where an insurer uses aerial imagery as a basis for non-renewal, beyond complying with statutory notification requirements, it is “best practice” to notify the homeowner before initiating the action, to provide the images used, and to allow the homeowner to provide updated information or dispute the imagery's accuracy. Insurers are “encouraged” to issue loss-control recommendations and to allow reasonable time for repairs before non-renewing.
So the right to see the photograph that cost you your policy is a recommendation in Rhode Island, not an entitlement. Asking for it is still the first thing to do.
The limit that matters to a condominium board
The bulletin is addressed to “homeowners insurance” and “homeowners insurers”. The words “condominium” and “association” do not appear in it.
A unit owner's HO-6 policy is a homeowners policy and is comfortably within the bulletin's subject matter. A condominium association's master policy is a commercial line, and whether the bulletin reaches it is not answered by its text. That is a genuinely open question and the obvious one to put to the Insurance Division.
What does protect the master policy is elsewhere, and it is worth knowing precisely because it is stronger than most boards realise:
The Condominium Act's own notice floor. Section 34-36.1-3.13(g): an insurer “may not cancel or refuse to renew it until thirty (30) days after notice of the proposed cancellation or nonrenewal has been mailed to the association, each unit owner, and each mortgagee or beneficiary under a deed of trust to whom a certificate or memorandum of insurance has been issued.” Not just the association — every unit owner. Our Rhode Island insurance requirements page covers the section.
The commercial-lines regulation. 230-RICR-20-20-1 reaches commercial property policies and requires a non-renewal notice “at least sixty (60) days before the expiration date”, with coverage continuing sixty days past notice if it is late. Cancellation after sixty days in force requires an enumerated ground, which includes “[a]ctivities or omissions on the part of the named insured which increase any hazard insured against, including a failure to comply with loss control recommendations” and “[c]hange in the risk which increases the risk of loss.”
With one gap worth naming. That regulation does not apply to surplus lines policies. Coastal Rhode Island master policies that land in surplus lines get no notice protection from it — though § 34-36.1-3.13(g) still applies, because it binds the insurer by statute rather than by regulation.
What this means for a board and an owner
Boards: read the loss-control letter, and answer it. “Failure to comply with loss control recommendations” is an enumerated cancellation ground on a commercial policy. A recommendation ignored is a ground created.
Boards: photograph your own roofs. Dated, clear, ground-level and drone imagery in the association's file is the cheapest available answer to a stale aerial image. The bulletin's fifteen-month standard cuts both ways — it tells you what the insurer's evidence has to be, and it tells you what yours should look like.
Owners: ask for the image. On an HO-6 non-renewal citing roof condition, the bulletin gives you the standards to test it against — currency, resolution, and whether what is visible is cosmetic streaking or material degradation.
Both: remember what is not in the bulletin. It regulates how imagery may be used. It does not require any insurer to write any policy, and it does not cap a premium.
What to watch next
Rhode Island issued only two insurance bulletins touching property owners in 2025 — this one and Bulletin 2025-4 on legislative changes, issued October 16, 2025 — and none at all in 2026 on homeowners or condominium insurance. Whether the Division extends the aerial-imagery standards to commercial residential policies, by bulletin or by regulation, is the single change that would most help a Rhode Island association. It has not happened yet.
Related Rhode Island HOA Topics
- R.I. Department of Business Regulation, Insurance Bulletin Number 2025-3, “Aerial Imagery Used by Homeowners Insurers” (August 18, 2025) ↩
- 230-RICR-20-20-1, Commercial Insurance Cancellation, Non-Renewal and Premium or Coverage Changes ↩
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-36.1-3.13, Insurance — including the 30-day cancellation notice at subsection (g) ↩
Stay on top of Rhode Island HOA law
Every week: new Rhode Island legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.