Rhode Island HOA Mediation & Dispute Resolution
Section 1: Overview — How HOA disputes are resolved in Rhode Island
Rhode Island settles community-association disputes the old-fashioned way, through contracts and the courts. The state runs no comprehensive statutory alternative-dispute-resolution (ADR) regime, and when a party loses at the trial level, the appeal goes straight to the Rhode Island Supreme Court.1 Which rules apply depends on when a condominium came into being. Condominiums created on or after July 1, 1982 answer to the Rhode Island Condominium Act (R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-36.1-1.01 et seq.); those created earlier remain under the predecessor Condominium Ownership Act (§ 34-36); and non-condominium planned communities have no comprehensive statute at all, relying instead on their recorded CC&Rs plus the Rhode Island Nonprofit Corporation Act (§ 7-6).2 For contractual disputes, Rhode Island enforces arbitration under its older arbitration statute (§ 10-3, not the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act), while the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) governs contracts that affect interstate commerce.3 The Superior Court runs its own court-connected ADR — a court-annexed arbitration program and periodic mediation — for qualifying civil cases.4 And because Rhode Island has no intermediate appellate court, a party unhappy with a Superior Court judgment appeals directly to the state Supreme Court.1 Step back nationally, and Rhode Island stands apart: it adopted the 1980 Uniform Condominium Act for condominiums specifically, not a full Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act (UCIOA), and it has no planned-community statute.5 The sections that follow trace the statutory, contractual, and court-based paths a real Rhode Island dispute travels.
Section 2: The dispute resolution framework
2A. Statutory dispute resolution under the Condominium Act
The Rhode Island Condominium Act (§ 34-36.1) rests on enforcement and lien mechanics rather than any mandatory ADR process. Section 34-36.1-3.02(a)(4) lets the unit owners' association institute, defend, or intervene in litigation or administrative proceedings in its own name on matters affecting the condominium.6 Section 34-36.1-3.20 lets the executive board impose and assess fines to enforce the declaration, bylaws, and rules, but it first requires notice and an opportunity for a hearing before the board fines an alleged violator; daily fines "shall be no more than one hundred dollars ($100) per day for residential condominiums nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) per day for commercial condominiums," non-daily fines top out at $500 (residential) and $1,000 (commercial), any declaration that purports to set a different cap is invalid, the board or its designee holds the hearing, and the decision must include costs and reasonable attorney's fees when the prevailing party is represented by a member of the Rhode Island Bar.7 Section 34-36.1-3.16 gives the association an automatic lien on a unit for unpaid assessments and fines, directs that any judgment enforcing the lien include costs and reasonable attorney's fees for the prevailing party, and bars enforcement unless proceedings begin within six years after the full amount comes due.8 The Act imposes no comprehensive mandatory pre-suit mediation or arbitration requirement like California's or Florida's; the notice-and-hearing step tied to fines is the closest thing to a required internal procedure. The creation date decides which statute governs: § 34-36.1-1.02 makes the post-1982 Act apply to condominiums created after July 1, 1982, leaves pre-1982 condominiums under Chapter 34-36 unless they voluntarily accept the newer Act, and reaches back to apply enumerated sections — including the lien, enforcement, and fee provisions — to pre-existing condominiums.2 Non-condominium planned communities fall outside § 34-36.1 entirely and depend on their recorded declaration and the Nonprofit Corporation Act (§ 7-6).9
2B. General civil ADR and arbitration
A declaration or other governing document may compel arbitration, and Rhode Island enforces those clauses under § 10-3. Section 10-3-2 makes a written provision to arbitrate valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract, and it requires a party who serves a notice of intention to arbitrate to state the twenty-day window within which the other side must move to stay.3 A court that faces a claim referable to arbitration must stay the action (§ 10-3-3), a party may petition the Superior Court to compel arbitration (§ 10-3-4), and the grounds for vacating an award are narrow (§ 10-3-12).3 Rhode Island never adopted the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act; the governing chapter dates to 1929. For any association contract that affects interstate commerce, the Federal Arbitration Act can preempt conflicting state limits. Separately, the Superior Court "administers the highly successful Court-Annexed Arbitration Program, which speeds the disposition of certain less-complex civil cases in which there is $100,000 or less at issue," certified under the Superior Court Rules Governing Arbitration of Civil Actions; the arbitration is nonbinding, a court-trained attorney-arbitrator usually makes an award within ten days of the hearing, and a party may reject the award within the rule's window and take a trial.4 The court also holds an annual "Settlement Week" mediation in Providence each December, where sixty-seven percent of the cases heard over the last five years settled through mediation.4 For lower-value assessment disputes, the District Court holds exclusive original jurisdiction of civil actions where the amount in controversy does not exceed $5,000 and concurrent jurisdiction with the Superior Court from more than $5,000 up to $10,000, and the small claims procedure handles the smallest matters.10
2C. CC&R-based dispute resolution and order of precedence
For planned communities, the recorded declaration does most of the dispute-resolution work, because no Rhode Island planned-community statute supplies default procedures. Declarations commonly build in mediation-as-a-condition-precedent clauses, arbitration clauses, venue selections, and prevailing-party attorney-fee provisions, and they may set up internal grievance or architectural-appeal steps an owner must exhaust before litigating. The order of precedence runs from the Condominium Act (for condominiums) down to the declaration, then the bylaws, then the rules; § 34-36.1-2.03 confirms that the declaration prevails over the bylaws except where the declaration conflicts with the Act.2 Operationally, a planned-community board should treat its declaration as the principal rulebook, and a court evaluates any arbitration clause in that declaration under § 10-3 and, where interstate commerce is involved, the Federal Arbitration Act.3
Section 3: Dispute resolution pathways and obligations
A. Internal / association-level resolution
Condominium boards must give notice and an opportunity for a hearing before they impose a fine (§ 34-36.1-3.20; STATUTORY; CONDOMINIUMS), and that step functions as the first tier of dispute resolution.7 Planned-community boards draw any grievance, hearing, or architectural-appeal procedure from the recorded declaration and bylaws (CONTRACTUAL; PLANNED COMMUNITIES), because no statute imposes one. Rhode Island keeps no administrative agency or ombudsman for HOA disputes and does not license community-association managers, so an aggrieved owner cannot escalate to a state regulator; instead the owner moves from the internal process straight to court.11
B. Mediation
The Superior Court offers court-connected mediation (RULE-BASED; CONDOMINIUMS and PLANNED COMMUNITIES) through the annual Settlement Week and related programs, but referral is not automatic for association cases and participation generally stays voluntary.4 Section 9-19-44 protects mediation communications and mediator work product from later disclosure (STATUTORY), and Rhode Island has no separate Uniform Mediation Act.12 A declaration may also make mediation a condition precedent to suit (CONTRACTUAL; PLANNED COMMUNITIES).
C. Arbitration
A declaration's arbitration clause is enforceable under § 10-3-2, and a court must stay litigation and may compel arbitration under §§ 10-3-3 and 10-3-4 (STATUTORY; CONDOMINIUMS and PLANNED COMMUNITIES).3 Arbitration may be binding or nonbinding, depending on the clause; the Federal Arbitration Act (FEDERAL) governs clauses in contracts that affect interstate commerce and can preempt inconsistent state requirements. The court-annexed program described in Section 2B is nonbinding by design.4
D. Litigation and appeals
The Superior Court is the trial venue for higher-value covenant-enforcement, assessment, and injunction actions, while the District Court and small claims handle the lower-value matters (§ 8-8-3; STATUTORY).10 An association may sue or be sued in its own name (§ 34-36.1-3.02(a)(4); STATUTORY; CONDOMINIUMS).6 Attorney fees follow the American rule, with a mandatory award to the prevailing party in a condominium lien action (§ 34-36.1-3.16(g); STATUTORY) and a discretionary award in breach-of-contract actions only where the court finds a complete absence of a justiciable issue or renders a default judgment (§ 9-1-45; STATUTORY).13 The limitations periods include the general ten-year period for contract and property-damage actions (§ 9-1-13) and the six-year period to enforce a condominium assessment lien (§ 34-36.1-3.16(e)).14 Appeals go directly to the Rhode Island Supreme Court, because the state has no intermediate appellate court (RULE-BASED).1
There is no subsection E here. Rhode Island keeps no administrative or agency forum for HOA disputes, an absence already noted in subsection A.
Section 4: Recent legislative and judicial activity
A. Recent bills
One 2025 measure sharpened the internal-governance dispute pathway that precedes many association lawsuits.
S 0509 Sub A · P.L. 2025, ch. 123 · 2025 Regular Session
This law amended § 34-36.1-1.02 and § 34-36.1-3.08. It now requires the executive board to hold a special meeting when 20% of the unit owners — or any lower percentage the bylaws set — request one to discuss an issue on which owners have a right to vote. It permits meetings by electronic means as long as every participant can communicate with the others at the same time, and it requires in-person meetings to take place in the county where the condominium sits. Its companion, H 5156 Sub A (P.L. 2025, ch. 136), carried the same changes through the House.[15]
| Property managers | Track special-meeting petitions and honor a valid 20% owner petition promptly, so you avoid an injunction fight over meeting notice. |
| HOA board members | A board can no longer refuse a properly petitioned special meeting, and it may now hold meetings electronically as long as members can communicate at the same time. |
| Community association attorneys | The amendment codifies special-meeting triggers and venue for condominiums and forms the statutory backdrop to the 2025 Song v. Lemoine appeal. |
| Homeowners | Owners now have a clearer statutory route to force a vote on association decisions without going straight to court. |
B. Recent rulings
The Rhode Island Supreme Court's 2025 docket included a decision that directly shapes how owners can compel the meeting where they contest a board's decisions.
Song v. Lemoine
Boyang Song and Travis McCune, owners at The 903 condominium in Providence, sued board president Evan Lemoine and secretary Stephen Rodio. The Supreme Court held that the owners had satisfied the signature requirement and that their proposed notice complied with § 34-36.1-3.08, so the board had to honor the owners' proposed notice and agenda, and it faulted the trial justice for granting relief the parties had never sought. The Community Associations Institute filed an amicus brief, and the Court reiterated that the Act "as a whole contains a strong consumer protection flavor."[16]
| Property managers | When owners submit a compliant special-meeting petition, use the owners' proposed agenda rather than substituting a broader board version. |
| HOA board members | Rejecting a compliant petition as "too narrow" is not permitted and can be reversed on appeal. |
| Community association attorneys | The decision confirms the Act's consumer-protection reading and limits judicial second-guessing of owner agendas to the issues actually raised. |
| Homeowners | Owners who follow the petition rules are entitled to the specific meeting they requested. |
C. Active legislative debates
In the 2026 session, S 2396 would soften the 2024 amendments to the arbitration statute (§ 10-3) by extending the window to apply to stay arbitration and by exempting agreements governed by the Federal Arbitration Act — a change that would affect how courts police association arbitration clauses.17 No bill proposing a comprehensive Rhode Island planned-community statute is pending.
Section 5: National positioning and related coverage
Rhode Island adopted the 1980 Uniform Condominium Act for condominiums, not a full UCIOA framework, and it has no comprehensive planned-community statute and no intermediate appellate court. That combination sets it apart from comprehensive-statute states such as California and Florida and from full-UCIOA jurisdictions. The direct-appeal structure sends trial rulings to the Rhode Island Supreme Court quickly and without an intermediate filter, and the older § 10-3 arbitration statute — rather than the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act — shapes how parties draft and contest arbitration clauses. For a multi-state operator, the practical takeaway is straightforward: in Rhode Island the declaration does most of the dispute-pathway work for planned communities, appeals run straight to the Supreme Court, and courts evaluate arbitration clauses under § 10-3 and the Federal Arbitration Act.
Federal frameworks also bear on Rhode Island association disputes, regardless of the state structure — notably the FAA, along with the FHA, ADA, FDCPA, SCRA, and OTARD.
- Rhode Island Judiciary, Know Your Courts: Superior Court (appeals taken directly to the Rhode Island Supreme Court) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Song v. Lemoine, No. 2024-34-Appeal (R.I. May 19, 2025) (discussing § 34-36.1-1.02 applicability, 1982 adoption of the Uniform Condominium Act, and § 34-36.1-2.03) ↩ ↩ ↩
- R.I. Gen. Laws ch. 10-3 (Arbitration), incl. §§ 10-3-2, 10-3-3, 10-3-4, 10-3-12 ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- Rhode Island Superior Court, Court-Annexed Arbitration Program and Settlement Week mediation ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- R.I. Gen. Laws ch. 34-36.1 (Rhode Island Condominium Act, index) ↩
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-36.1-3.02 (Powers of unit owners' association) ↩ ↩
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-36.1-3.20 (Enforcement of declaration, by-laws and rules; notice and hearing; fine caps) ↩ ↩
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-36.1-3.16 (Lien for assessments; prevailing-party fees; six-year limit) ↩
- R.I. Gen. Laws ch. 7-6 (Rhode Island Nonprofit Corporation Act) ↩
- Rhode Island District Court, Civil jurisdiction (R.I. Gen. Laws § 8-8-3) ↩ ↩
- Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation (real estate licensing generally; no HOA agency or CAM licensing) ↩
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-19-44 (Mediator confidentiality in mediation proceedings) ↩
- R.I. Gen. Laws § 9-1-45 (Attorney's fees in breach of contract actions) ↩
- R.I. Gen. Laws ch. 9-1 (limitations of actions, incl. § 9-1-13) ↩
- P.L. 2025 ch. 123 (S 0509 Sub A); companion P.L. 2025 ch. 136 (H 5156 Sub A) — amending §§ 34-36.1-1.02 and 34-36.1-3.08 ↩
- Song v. Lemoine, No. 2024-34-Appeal (R.I. May 19, 2025) ↩
- 2026 R.I. S 2396 (proposed amendments to ch. 10-3 arbitration) ↩