Hilton Head ties the short-term rental permit to the covenants: no HOA letter, no permit
Hilton Head ties the short-term rental permit to the covenants: no HOA letter, no permit
2026-09-19 · South Carolina · Compliance
Hilton Head Island has made a private covenant a condition of a public permit. The Town's published short-term rental requirements now state, in full: "If applicable, owner must provide a letter from HOA stating that the property is permitted to be a short-term rental."1
Town Council voted in October 2025 to amend the ordinance. The requirement now sits alongside the rest of the permit conditions on the Town's ordinance page.
What else the amendment added
The HOA letter arrived in a package of operational conditions, all published on the same page:
- Properties of 3,600 square feet or more must have a compliant fire suppression system, or an approved fire safety monitoring system with siren coverage throughout the home, plus smoke detectors in every bedroom, on every floor and along egress paths.
- External propane barbecues require a 60-minute shut-off valve, with a combustible-gas alarm inside the residence where applicable.
- Bedrooms must meet building code and serve primarily as sleeping space rather than living or dining space.
- A maximum of six vehicles on the driveway.
- The permit number must appear in all advertisements.
- The application must be in a person's name, not an entity such as an LLC.
- Renewal moves to April 30, aligning with the business licence.
Why the HOA line is the significant one
Across most of South Carolina, a town permit and a restrictive covenant are separate systems that do not speak to each other. A municipality issues or refuses a permit under its zoning and licensing powers; an association enforces its covenants as a private contract in its own action. An owner can hold a valid permit and still lose a covenant enforcement suit.
Hilton Head has connected the two in one direction. The Town will not issue the permit unless the association confirms the use is allowed.
The direction of the link matters
The connection runs one way only, and the distinction is worth stating precisely.
A Hilton Head permit now requires association sign-off where an association exists. But no South Carolina municipality's permit authorises a covenant violation, and no South Carolina statute makes a permit a defence to a covenant enforcement action. An association that has never restricted short-term rentals does not acquire a restriction because the Town asks for a letter; and an owner who obtains a permit has not obtained permission from the association.
What the rule does change is the practical order of events. Previously an owner could permit, advertise and rent, leaving the association to discover the use and bring an enforcement action afterwards — with the cost and delay of litigation falling on the association. Under the amended ordinance the association's position is established at the front of the process, and the Town declines the permit rather than the association suing after the fact.
What "if applicable" leaves open
The requirement is conditional on its face. The Town's text does not define which properties are "applicable," what the letter must contain beyond stating that short-term rental is permitted, who at an association may sign it, or what happens where governing documents are silent rather than permissive — the most common situation in older communities whose covenants predate the short-term rental market.
Nor does the published requirement address an association that declines to respond. The Town's page states the requirement; it does not create an appeal from an association's refusal or non-response.
Enforcement is being resourced
Separately, Town Council gave second and final reading on March 31, 2026 to a budget amendment expanding the short-term rental programme. The flat $250 permit fee was replaced by $150 per bedroom annually, with a $250 late renewal fee, four new full-time positions and a 24/7 response hotline, shifting the programme from complaint-based to proactive inspection.2
That funding matters to the covenant question, because an inspection regime that verifies permits also, indirectly, verifies that an association letter was obtained.
Where the rest of South Carolina stands
No state statute governs short-term rentals. Both 2025-2026 bills that would have settled the question died in committee — S. 442, which would have expressly authorised local governments to prohibit rentals, and H. 3861, which would have preempted local prohibitions. H. 3861's text reached only government entities; it did not mention associations, covenants or deed restrictions, so even its passage would have left covenant bans untouched.3
Municipal activity continued regardless. Columbia gave second reading on January 6, 2026 to amendments limiting short-term rentals in residential districts to specified arterial and collector streets, grandfathering previously approved rentals. Charleston's Planning Commission deferred a proposed overhaul of the 2018 ordinance on July 15, 2026 rather than forwarding it to City Council, leaving the 2018 rules in place.4
For covenant interpretation itself, the governing South Carolina authority remains a 2018 Court of Appeals decision holding that where a rental restriction is capable of two reasonable readings, the ambiguity is resolved in favour of the free use of property. Nothing in 2025 or 2026 disturbed it, and the covenant, not the permit, still decides the private question.
Related South Carolina HOA Topics
Stay on top of South Carolina HOA law
Every week: new South Carolina legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.