Tennessee HOA Compliance

Tennessee HOA Compliance

3. Compliance topics grid

1. Introduction

Tennessee splits its common-interest community law by property form. No single statewide planned-community act covers non-condominium subdivision HOAs. Their authority typically flows from recorded covenants, bylaws, corporate charters, and, when an association incorporates as a nonprofit corporation, the Tennessee Nonprofit Corporation Act at Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 48-51-101 et seq.1 Condominiums follow a different track. The Tennessee Condominium Act of 2008, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 66-27-201 et seq., governs newer projects, and the older Horizontal Property Act, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 66-27-101 et seq., still applies to earlier ones.2

A civil HOA dispute may start in Circuit Court or Chancery Court, depending on the claim. Civil appeals then move to the Tennessee Court of Appeals, with possible review by the Tennessee Supreme Court.3 Tennessee does not run a dedicated HOA regulatory agency. The Tennessee Real Estate Commission regulates real-estate licensees,4 and the Attorney General's Division of Consumer Affairs handles general consumer complaints.5

Recent activity stays targeted rather than sweeping. Lawmakers enacted 2025 and 2026 measures on condominium escrow funds, EV chargers, and HOA fidelity bonds, and the Court of Appeals issued decisions on covenant enforcement and HOA access disputes.6 Place Tennessee within the national HOA-law landscape, and it remains a lighter-regulation state for non-condominium planned communities, with narrower statutory overlays for specific issues.7

2. Primary statute and key resources

  • Subdivision HOA baseline, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 48-51-101 et seq. Non-condominium HOA governance leans heavily on recorded documents and nonprofit corporate law.8
  • Condominium statutes, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 66-27-101 et seq. and 66-27-201 et seq. These chapters frame Tennessee's condominium regime.9
  • Tennessee courts. Circuit and Chancery Courts handle trial-level civil disputes, the Court of Appeals hears civil appeals, and the Supreme Court takes discretionary review.10
  • Tennessee Real Estate Commission. TREC regulates real-estate license categories. It does not issue a stand-alone HOA manager license.11
  • Tennessee Attorney General, Division of Consumer Affairs. DCA receives consumer complaints and forwards them for attempted resolution.12

4. Tennessee's recent regulatory landscape

Recent Legislation

Tennessee's recent HOA legislation stays issue-specific. The General Assembly hasn't passed a general planned-community act, but it has enacted targeted rules on fidelity bonds, EV chargers, and condominium escrow.

Status Signed
Last verified May 9, 2026
Docket

SB2326/HB2338 · Public Chapter 731 · 2026 Regular Session

Effective
Jan 1, 2027
Sunset
N/A
Relating to property owners' associations' responsibility to maintain fidelity bonds

Public Chapter 731 requires an HOA that collects assessments for common expenses to obtain and maintain blanket fidelity bond coverage. The bond has to protect the association against theft or dishonesty by officers, directors, employees, managing agents, and the managing agent's own employees. Tennessee now sets a floor for that coverage rather than leaving it entirely to governing documents.[13]

What this means, by role
Property managers Add fidelity bond verification to annual insurance and budget calendars.
HOA board members Treat bond coverage as a recurring financial-control duty, not a one-time setup.
Community association attorneys Review governing documents and management contracts for bond-language gaps.
Homeowners Association funds gain a statutory baseline for dishonesty coverage.
Status Signed
Last verified May 9, 2026
Docket

HB1875/SB1787 · 2026 Regular Session

Effective
Jul 1, 2026
Sunset
N/A
Relating to electric vehicle charging stations

The act prohibits condominium associations and HOAs from barring an owner from installing a personal-use EV charging station on property the owner owns. The bill keeps room for reasonable association controls — safety, installation, and aesthetic standards — but it takes blanket bans off the table.[14]

What this means, by role
Property managers Architectural forms need an EV-charger review path before July 1, 2026.
HOA board members Blanket bans create risk, while safety and installation standards still matter.
Community association attorneys Update rules to separate allowed controls from prohibited bans.
Homeowners Owners gain a statutory basis for personal-use charger requests on owned property.
Status Signed
Last verified May 9, 2026
Docket

SB1079/HB0871 · Public Chapter 180 · 2025 Regular Session

Effective
Jul 1, 2025
Sunset
N/A
Relating to the use of escrow funds for condominium projects

Public Chapter 180 adds requirements that govern declarant access to, and use of, deposits made in connection with the purchase or reservation of a condominium unit. The act focuses on the developer side of the transaction rather than on board governance, so its main audience is new-project counsel and developer-controlled boards.[15]

What this means, by role
Property managers New-project files should separate association operations from declarant escrow duties.
HOA board members Developer-controlled condominium boards should track deposit-handling rules.
Community association attorneys Purchase, reservation, and escrow forms need review under the 2025 act.
Homeowners New-unit purchasers get clearer statutory treatment of deposits and reservation funds.

Recent Court Rulings

Tennessee's recent HOA appellate opinions cluster in the Court of Appeals. They often turn on covenant text, declaratory judgment procedure, and the record supporting summary judgment.

Status Final
Last verified May 9, 2026
Case

Hurley v. Green Shadows Homeowners Association, Inc.

Tennessee Court of Appeals, Western Section · No. W2024-00556-COA-R3-CV
Decided
Apr 24, 2025
Court
Tenn. Ct. App.

The Court of Appeals vacated the dismissal of the owner's declaratory-judgment action and reversed the summary judgment and attorney fees awarded to the HOA. The trial-court order, the panel found, did not provide a sufficient explanation, and factual disputes still remained. The practical lesson: associations winning at the trial level still need a record that walks through the elements, not a one-line ruling.[16]

What this means, by role
Property managers Preserve architectural files, board minutes, application records, and owner communications.
HOA board members Fee-shifting and enforcement positions need a record that supports each element.
Community association attorneys Proposed orders should make findings clear and identify necessary parties early.
Homeowners Covenant challenges can survive when a dismissal or summary judgment lacks a sufficient record.
Status Final
Last verified May 9, 2026
Case

Morris v. Foster, et al.

Tennessee Court of Appeals, Middle Section · No. M2024-00711-COA-R3-CV
Decided
Sept 5, 2025
Court
Tenn. Ct. App.

The Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment requiring a homeowner to provide private-road access to all HOA members, and it affirmed an attorney-fee award for the HOA and the neighboring owners. The takeaway for associations: recorded subdivision rights can defeat a unilateral gate or access claim, and a strong CCR fee provision can carry through to appellate fees.[17]

What this means, by role
Property managers Access-control disputes need plats, covenants, agreements, and board records in one file.
HOA board members Private-road restrictions should be checked against recorded subdivision rights.
Community association attorneys CCR fee provisions can support appellate fee exposure when enforcement succeeds.
Homeowners Gate or access claims may fail when recorded documents preserve broader member access.

Regulatory Developments

Tennessee doesn't run a dedicated HOA regulator. When association-run utility systems come up, the Public Utility Commission can step in alongside ordinary covenant disputes.

Status Held in abeyance
Last verified May 9, 2026
Agency

Tennessee Public Utility Commission

Docket No. 25-00048 · Tellico Village Property Owners Association
Issued
Feb 27, 2026
Type
Docket order

In 2025, the docket included a Consumer Advocate petition asking the Tennessee Public Utility Commission to convene a show-cause proceeding against Tellico Village Property Owners Association. A February 27, 2026 order then held the docket in abeyance after TVPOA cited pending SB2534/HB2164 legislation tied to its utility services. The docket isn't a general HOA enforcement program, but it shows that property-owner associations running utility systems can encounter state utility regulation outside ordinary covenant law.[18]

What this means, by role
Property managers Associations that provide utility services need separate utility-regulatory tracking.
HOA board members Utility assets, rates, and transfers may require regulatory counsel.
Community association attorneys Association-run services should be checked against TPUC and utility statutes.
Homeowners Utility-service disputes may involve remedies beyond covenant and corporate-law claims.

Active Policy Debates

Policy debate in Tennessee stays bill-specific rather than moving toward a general HOA act. Recent proposals took on child-care use restrictions, first-responder emergency-vehicle parking, and the TVPOA utility-jurisdiction issue that TPUC Docket No. 25-00048 raises.19,20,21

5. Closing note

HOA Weekly's Tennessee coverage will grow as new bills, appellate rulings, utility dockets, and agency materials surface. Federal frameworks — the Fair Housing Act, the ADA, the FDCPA, the SCRA, and the FCC's Over-the-Air Reception Devices Rule — may also apply to Tennessee associations depending on the facts. Deeper federal coverage will live at /federal/.22,23,24,25,26

Footnotes

  1. Tennessee Code public access, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 48-51-101 et seq.
  2. Tennessee Code public access, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 66-27-101 et seq. and 66-27-201 et seq.
  3. Tennessee Courts, Circuit, Criminal, Chancery Courts; Tennessee Courts, Court of Appeals; Tennessee Courts, Supreme Court
  4. Tennessee Real Estate Commission
  5. Tennessee Attorney General, Division of Consumer Affairs
  6. Tennessee General Assembly, SB2326/HB2338; Tennessee General Assembly, HB1875/SB1787; Tennessee General Assembly, SB1079/HB0871; Hurley v. Green Shadows Homeowners Association, Inc.; Morris v. Foster, et al.
  7. Tennessee Code public access, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 48-51-101 et seq.; §§ 66-27-101 et seq.; §§ 66-27-201 et seq.
  8. Tennessee Code public access, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 48-51-101 et seq.
  9. Tennessee Code public access, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 66-27-101 et seq. and 66-27-201 et seq.
  10. Tennessee Courts, Circuit, Criminal, Chancery Courts; Tennessee Courts, Court of Appeals; Tennessee Courts, Supreme Court
  11. Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance, Tennessee Real Estate Commission
  12. Tennessee Attorney General, File a Consumer Complaint
  13. Tennessee Public Chapter 731, property owners' associations' responsibility to maintain fidelity bonds (SB2326/HB2338)
  14. Tennessee General Assembly, HB1875/SB1787 bill text, electric vehicle charging stations
  15. Tennessee Public Chapter 180, use of escrow funds for condominium projects (SB1079/HB0871)
  16. Tennessee Court of Appeals, Hurley v. Green Shadows Homeowners Association, Inc., No. W2024-00556-COA-R3-CV
  17. Tennessee Court of Appeals, Morris v. Foster, et al., No. M2024-00711-COA-R3-CV
  18. Tennessee Public Utility Commission, Electronic Docket No. 25-00048; Order Holding Docket in Abeyance
  19. Tennessee General Assembly, SB2534/HB2164
  20. Tennessee General Assembly, HB1069/SB1013 child-care property-use bill text
  21. Tennessee General Assembly, HB1462/SB1763 first-responder vehicle parking bill text
  22. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Housing Act overview
  23. ADA.gov, Americans with Disabilities Act text
  24. Federal Trade Commission, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act text
  25. U.S. Department of Justice, Servicemembers Civil Relief Act summary
  26. Federal Communications Commission, Over-the-Air Reception Devices Rule