Virginia HOA Architectural Review
| # | Mechanic | Virginia rule | Authority / citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Source of architectural authority | The recorded declaration sets the authority, and the board or an architectural committee administers it. HOAs answer to the Property Owners' Association Act; condominiums answer to the Virginia Condominium Act; condominiums created before July 1, 1974 fall under the Horizontal Property Act. Most associations also incorporate as nonstock corporations.1,2,3,4 | Va. Code §§ 55.1-1800 et seq.; §§ 55.1-1900 et seq.; §§ 55.1-2000 et seq.; tit. 13.1; recorded declaration |
| 2 | Statutory decision deadline for applications | No statute sets a standalone deadline; the governing documents run the process. Notice-and-hearing rules apply when the association charges an owner for a violation.5,6 | Va. Code §§ 55.1-1819, 55.1-1959; recorded declaration |
| 3 | Deemed approval if association misses deadline | No statutory rule; the declaration decides. | recorded declaration |
| 4 | Written decision required | No standalone architectural mandate. A written complaint procedure and a Notice of Final Adverse Decision run through the Ombudsman.7 | 18VAC48-70; recorded declaration |
| 5 | Written reasons required for denial | No standalone statutory mandate; the declaration governs. | recorded declaration |
| 6 | Owner right to a hearing or appeal | Charges for violations require notice and a chance to be heard. The association's complaint procedure and Ombudsman review add a second path.5,6,7 | Va. Code §§ 55.1-1819, 55.1-1959; 18VAC48-70; recorded declaration |
| 7 | Governing standard for decisions | Reasonableness. Courts enforce the declaration and rules adopted under statutory authority, but they construe restrictions strictly against the restriction.8 | Va. Code §§ 55.1-1819, 55.1-1959; Sainani v. Belmont Glen HOA; recorded declaration |
| 8 | Solar energy devices | An association may not prohibit a device on the owner's own property unless the recorded declaration establishes the prohibition. It may set reasonable size, place, and manner restrictions, and it may prohibit solar on common area.9,10 | Va. Code § 55.1-1820.1 (HOAs); § 55.1-1951.1 (condominiums); recorded declaration |
| 9 | Flag display | An association may not prohibit display of the U.S. flag in compliance with the U.S. Flag Code. It may impose reasonable size, place, duration, and manner restrictions that protect a substantial interest.11,12,13 | Va. Code § 55.1-1820 (HOAs); § 55.1-1951 (condominiums); Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005 |
| 10 | Political / campaign signs | No POAA or Condominium Act carve-out protects political signs; an association may regulate or prohibit them by declaration or rule. For-sale signs get separate protection.14,15 | Va. Code § 55.1-1822; § 15.2-109; recorded declaration |
| 11 | Drought-tolerant / native landscaping | No state carve-out; the declaration governs. | recorded declaration |
| 12 | Antennas and satellite dishes | The federal OTARD rule limits restrictions on covered devices.16 | 47 C.F.R. § 1.4000 |
| 13 | EV charging stations | An association may not prohibit a station on the owner's own property except as the declaration provides. It may set reasonable restrictions on number, size, place, and manner, and it may prohibit or restrict installations on common area.17,18 | Va. Code § 55.1-1823.1 (HOAs); § 55.1-1962.1 (condominiums); recorded declaration |
| 14 | Other protected items | For-sale signs are protected, and home-based businesses are protected subject to local ordinances.14,19 | Va. Code §§ 55.1-1821, 55.1-1822; recorded declaration |
| 15 | Enforcement remedies for violations | Charges after notice and hearing, capped at $50 for a single offense or $10 per day for a continuing offense and not to exceed 90 days; injunctive relief; an assessment lien; CIC Board registration and annual reporting; CIC manager licensing; and the Ombudsman complaint process.5,6,20,21,22 | Va. Code §§ 55.1-1819, 55.1-1959, 55.1-1835; §§ 54.1-2346, 54.1-2349; recorded declaration |
Section 1: Overview
Virginia governs single-family and townhome homeowners associations under the Property Owners' Association Act and condominiums under the Virginia Condominium Act. Lawmakers recodified both into Title 55.1 of the Code of Virginia, effective October 1, 2019, and they anchored architectural authority in the recorded declaration rather than in any statutory architectural-review code.1,2 So the first question is which act applies. An HOA falls under the Property Owners' Association Act in Chapter 18, a condominium under the Virginia Condominium Act in Chapter 19, a condominium created before July 1, 1974 under the Horizontal Property Act in Chapter 20, and a cooperative under the Virginia Real Estate Cooperative Act in Chapter 21. The Property Owners' Association Act does not reach condominiums, cooperatives, time-shares, or membership campgrounds.
Turn to the limits that actually shape an architectural committee's work, and Virginia draws a clear line. It bars an association from prohibiting a solar energy collection device on an owner's own property unless the recorded declaration itself establishes the prohibition, while it still allows reasonable size, place, and manner restrictions. Virginia adds carve-outs for the U.S. flag, electric vehicle charging stations, for-sale signs, and home-based businesses. It also layers on a state regulator, the Common Interest Community Board within the Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation, which registers associations and licenses community association managers on a mandatory basis. When an association charges an owner for a violation, it must give notice and a chance to be heard, and a statute caps the charge. Civil appeals now run from the Circuit Court to the Court of Appeals of Virginia and then to the Supreme Court of Virginia, a path that changed in 2022 when civil appeals of right moved to the Court of Appeals.23 The sections below lay out the framework, the compliance obligations, and the recent activity.
Section 2: The architectural-review framework
2A. Source and scope of architectural authority
Architectural control in Virginia starts with the recorded declaration, and the board of directors or an architectural committee administers whatever review the declaration delegates. Neither the Property Owners' Association Act nor the Virginia Condominium Act supplies a standalone architectural-review code. The acts hand the board a rule-making power and set specific limits; the declaration supplies the design standards.
Several statutes carry the structure, all recodified into Title 55.1 (Property and Conveyances), Subtitle IV (Common Interest Communities), effective October 1, 2019, which repealed the former Title 55. The Property Owners' Association Act (§§ 55.1-1800 through 55.1-1836) governs HOAs, and it applies to developments subject to a declaration first recorded after January 1, 1959, to associations organized after that date, and to subdivisions under the Subdivided Land Sales Act.1 The Virginia Condominium Act (§§ 55.1-1900 et seq.) governs condominiums and supersedes the Horizontal Property Act as of July 1, 1974, so no one may create a condominium under the Horizontal Property Act on or after that date.2 The Horizontal Property Act (§§ 55.1-2000 et seq.) still governs condominium projects that predate July 1, 1974.3 Cooperatives fall under the Virginia Real Estate Cooperative Act (§§ 55.1-2100 et seq.).4 Most associations also incorporate as nonstock corporations under Title 13.1, which supplies the corporate overlay for meetings, directors, and governance. Older cases and secondary sources still cite the repealed Title 55, such as former § 55-508 or § 55-79.39; convert those citations to their Title 55.1 successors.
Virginia is a mandatory-regulator state. The Common Interest Community Board, inside the Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation, issues a certificate of registration to each association that files properly, and every association must file an annual report with the Board, accompanied by a fee the Board sets and credits to the Common Interest Community Management Information Fund.22,20 Community association managers must hold a license, because any entity that offers management services to a common interest community must carry a valid license from the Board.21 Separately, the Common Interest Community Ombudsman receives owner complaints and reviews an association's Notice of Final Adverse Decision, but the Ombudsman checks compliance with common-interest-community law rather than the merits of an architectural decision.24
The order of precedence for an architectural dispute runs from the applicable act, to the recorded declaration, to the bylaws, and then to the rules and architectural guidelines. A rule or guideline that reaches past the authority the declaration grants cannot stand.
2B. The approval process, standards, and charges for violations
Virginia sets no standalone statutory deadline for deciding an architectural application and no deemed-approval rule. The architectural process comes entirely from the recorded declaration and from the association's rule-making power under § 55.1-1819 (HOAs) and § 55.1-1959 (condominiums), which let the board establish, adopt, and enforce rules for the common areas and for the other areas the declaration assigns.5,6
The governing standard is reasonableness, anchored in the declaration. Virginia courts enforce a valid recorded declaration and the rules an association adopts under statutory authority, but they construe restrictive covenants strictly against the restriction, and a rule must connect reasonably to authority the declaration actually confers.8 So an architectural standard should be reasonable, applied consistently, and grounded in the declaration.
On charges for violations, § 55.1-1819 (HOAs) and § 55.1-1959 (condominiums) set one uniform framework. The declaration or rules must expressly authorize the charge. Before it acts, the association must give the owner a reasonable chance to correct the alleged violation after written notice. If the violation stands, the owner must get a chance to be heard and to bring counsel before the board or a tribunal the documents name, with hearing notice hand-delivered or sent by registered or certified mail at least 14 days ahead and the result delivered within seven days of the hearing. The charge "shall not exceed $50 for a single offense or $10 per day for any offense of a continuing nature," and "the total charges for any offense of a continuing nature shall not be assessed for a period exceeding 90 days," which caps a single continuing violation at $900.
The complaint pathway adds another step. An association must adopt a written complaint procedure, and an owner who receives a final adverse decision may file a Notice of Final Adverse Decision with the Common Interest Community Ombudsman within 30 days, on a Board-approved form and with a $25 filing fee.24,7 The Ombudsman reviews only whether the decision conflicts with common-interest-community law or Board regulations, not whether the architectural judgment was right.
Here is the practical sequence for the professional reader: classify the community and cite the correct act; ground every architectural standard in the recorded declaration; follow the notice-and-hearing sequence before you charge any violation; keep the written complaint procedure current; and remember that the manager must hold a license and the association must register.
2C. Statutory and federal limits on architectural authority
Solar. Under § 55.1-1820.1 (HOAs) and § 55.1-1951.1 (condominiums), an association may not prohibit an owner from installing a solar energy collection device on that owner's property unless the recorded declaration establishes the prohibition. A board-adopted rule alone cannot ban solar. The association may set reasonable restrictions on the size, place, and manner of placement on individually owned property, and a restriction counts as unreasonable if it raises installation cost by five percent or cuts energy production by ten percent below the initial proposal, on documentation from a NABCEP-certified, Virginia-licensed specialist. The association may prohibit or restrict solar on common elements or common area.9,10
Flag. Under § 55.1-1820 (HOAs) and § 55.1-1951 (condominiums), and in line with the federal Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005, an association may not prohibit an owner from displaying the U.S. flag on the owner's own property in compliance with the U.S. Flag Code. It may impose reasonable restrictions on size, place, duration, and manner that protect a substantial interest, and it may restrict flags in common areas.11,12,13
EV charging. Under § 55.1-1823.1 (HOAs) and § 55.1-1962.1 (condominiums), and except as the declaration provides otherwise, an association may not prohibit a lot or unit owner from installing an EV charging station for personal use on property the owner owns. The association may set reasonable restrictions on number, size, place, and manner, may prohibit or restrict installation on common area, and may require indemnification and insurance.17,18
For-sale signs and home-based businesses. Under § 55.1-1822, an association may not force an owner to use an association for-sale sign or a sign that fails Real Estate Board requirements. Under § 55.1-1821, an association may not prohibit a lot owner from running a home-based business inside the residence, subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions and local ordinances.14,19 No political-sign or drought-tolerant landscaping carve-out lives in the Property Owners' Association Act or the Virginia Condominium Act; § 55.1-1819.1 is a smoking-rule provision, not a sign provision.25 Political-sign regulation in Virginia turns on the recorded declaration and rules, and the § 15.2-109 restriction on localities does not reach private associations.15
The federal overlays apply in Virginia, and they add to state law rather than replace it. The Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005 permits reasonable safety restrictions.13 The FCC OTARD rule, 47 C.F.R. § 1.4000, limits restrictions on covered antennas and satellite dishes one meter or less.16 The Fair Housing Act reasonable-modification right, 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(A), requires an association to allow owner-funded reasonable modifications for a disability, subject to reasonableness.26
Section 3: Compliance obligations in the architectural-review process
A. Adopting and maintaining architectural standards
The authority to adopt architectural standards is DECLARATION-based. The board's rule-making power under § 55.1-1819 (HOAs) and § 55.1-1959 (condominiums) is STATUTORY, but it reaches only the areas the declaration assigns. A standard that exceeds the declaration cannot be enforced, so trace each guideline back to declaration language (DECLARATION; POAA/Condominium Act).5,6
B. Reviewing and deciding applications
The review timeline, the deemed-approval treatment, the written-decision format, and the reasons-for-denial requirement are all DECLARATION-based, because no POAA or Condominium Act provision sets a decision deadline or a deemed-approval rule (recorded declaration). Apply the standards consistently and reasonably, because Virginia courts construe restrictions strictly (case law; recorded declaration).8
C. Honoring statutory and federal owner protections
These obligations are STATUTORY, and they override a conflicting declaration or rule except where the statute preserves a declaration exception: solar under § 55.1-1820.1 / § 55.1-1951.1 (no prohibition unless the recorded declaration establishes it, with reasonable size, place, and manner restrictions allowed); flag under § 55.1-1820 / § 55.1-1951; EV charging under § 55.1-1823.1 / § 55.1-1962.1 (subject to the declaration, with common area restrictable); and for-sale signs under § 55.1-1822 and home-based businesses under § 55.1-1821.9,10,11,12,14,17,18,19 The federal overlays stand on their own and add to state law: the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005, the FCC OTARD rule (47 C.F.R. § 1.4000), and the FHA reasonable-modification right (42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(A)).13,16,26
D. Enforcement and dispute resolution
The charges-for-violations process is STATUTORY: notice, a chance to correct, a 14-day hearing notice, a decision within seven days, and the $50 / $10-per-day / 90-day caps under § 55.1-1819 and § 55.1-1959. Enforcement by injunction or damages, plus prevailing-party attorney fees, is STATUTORY under § 55.1-1819.5,6 The complaint-procedure and Notice-of-Final-Adverse-Decision pathway is STATUTORY and regulatory (§ 54.1-2354.4; 18VAC48-70).24,7 Association registration and annual reporting (§ 55.1-1835) and manager licensing (§ 54.1-2346) are STATUTORY obligations the Common Interest Community Board administers.20,21
Section 4: Recent activity
The coverage window runs from mid-2023 through July 2026, drawing on the Code of Virginia, Virginia's Judicial System, and the Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation. The General Assembly amends the two acts most sessions, the courts hold associations to their own documents, and the regulator keeps updating the Ombudsman forms.
Recent Legislation
Virginia isn't rewriting its HOA code wholesale. The General Assembly works session by session, and the most consequential recent change answers a specific court ruling on what an association may charge.
SB 672 · Chapter 685 · 2024 Regular Session
SB 672 makes clear that neither the Property Owners' Association Act nor the Virginia Condominium Act stops an association from levying or using assessments, charges, or fees to pay its contractual or other legal obligations. It also bars an association from charging fewer than all owners unless the acts specifically authorize it. Lawmakers passed it as a direct answer to the 2023 Court of Appeals decision in Burkholder v. Palisades Park Owners Association.[27]
| Property managers | Reconcile budgets so that assessments tied to legal and contractual obligations are clearly documented and applied to all owners. |
| HOA board members | You may fund the association's legal obligations through assessments, but selective charges need specific authority. |
| Community association attorneys | Read this fix alongside Burkholder, and confirm the declaration expressly authorizes any owner-specific charge. |
| Homeowners | Your association can recover the cost of its legal duties, but it cannot single you out without clear authority. |
HB 2750 · 2025 Regular Session
HB 2750 amends how a common interest community terminates a management contract, updating § 55.1-1837 of the Property Owners' Association Act and § 55.1-1940.1 of the Condominium Act. It does not create a new architectural-review deadline or a new architectural carve-out, but it changes the mechanics of the association's most important vendor relationship.[28]
| Property managers | Review your management agreements against the updated termination terms before the next renewal. |
| HOA board members | You gain clearer footing to exit a management contract that no longer serves the community. |
| Community association attorneys | Update contract templates so termination clauses track the amended statute. |
| Homeowners | A board can change managers more predictably, which affects who handles your requests. |
HB 1704 / SB 808 · 2025 Regular Session
This companion legislation adds an insurance-deductible disclosure to the resale certificate, amending § 55.1-2310. It sharpens what a buyer learns before closing, and it points, once again, toward disclosure rather than any change to the architectural-review process.[29]
| Property managers | Update resale-certificate templates to show the insurance-deductible figure. |
| HOA board members | Confirm the association's deductible information is current and accurate for disclosures. |
| Community association attorneys | Add the new disclosure line to your resale-package review. |
| Homeowners | When you buy, expect clearer information about the association's insurance deductible. |
Recent Court Rulings
Virginia's courts aren't rewriting HOA law from the bench. They are doing something more practical: holding associations to the plain words of their own documents. Two decisions show the pattern — one on whether an association may charge for something its declaration never authorized, and one on how far a covenant guideline can stretch.
Burkholder v. Palisades Park Owners Ass'n, Inc.
The court held that under § 55.1-1805 an association may not impose an assessment for lot-compliance inspections unless the declaration expressly authorizes it, and it read "expressly authorized" to demand that the declaration speak with unmistakable clarity. The decision reversed a circuit court judgment and vacated a $67,481.68 attorney-fee award that had been entered under the Act's fee-shifting provision, § 55.1-1828. It shows how strictly Virginia courts read association authority, and that reach extends to architectural enforcement grounded in declaration language.[30]
| Property managers | Confirm the declaration authorizes any charge before you bill it, and keep the authorizing language on file. |
| HOA board members | Do not infer a charging power from a general assessment clause; the declaration must say it plainly. |
| Community association attorneys | Test every fee against the "unmistakable clarity" standard before advising the board to collect it. |
| Homeowners | You can challenge a charge the declaration never expressly authorized. |
Sainani v. Belmont Glen Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.
This remains the controlling architectural-standards precedent. The Supreme Court of Virginia held that seasonal-decoration guidelines exceeded the scope of the recorded covenants and could not be enforced, because they were not reasonably related to any covenant. The court applied the principle of strict construction to restrictive covenants and affirmed that a lot owner enjoys the "absolute right" to property, which "consists in the free use, enjoyment, and disposal of all [one's] acquisitions, without any control or diminution, save only by the laws of the land."[8]
| Property managers | Enforce only the guidelines that tie back to a covenant, and document that link. |
| HOA board members | A guideline that reaches beyond the covenants is unenforceable, however reasonable it sounds. |
| Community association attorneys | Anchor every rule in a specific covenant before the association tries to enforce it. |
| Homeowners | You can resist a guideline that has no covenant behind it. |
Regulatory Developments
The regulator's recent work is procedural, and it centers on the Ombudsman. The Common Interest Community Ombudsman regulations set the forms an owner uses to complain and to escalate a final adverse decision, and the Board has refreshed them twice in this window.
Common Interest Community Ombudsman
The Board amended 18VAC48-70 with an effective date of January 1, 2024, and again with an effective date of August 1, 2025, updating the complaint and Notice-of-Final-Adverse-Decision forms. The Notice of Final Adverse Decision still carries a 30-day filing deadline and a $25 fee.[7]
| Property managers | Make sure the association hands owners the current complaint forms, not an outdated version. |
| HOA board members | Keep the written complaint procedure aligned with the 2025 regulation. |
| Community association attorneys | Track the amendments and confirm your clients use the Board-approved forms. |
| Homeowners | You have 30 days and a $25 fee to escalate a final adverse decision. |
Section 5: National positioning + related coverage
Virginia sits toward the procedure-heavy, owner-protective end of the national spectrum on enforcement. Its $50-per-offense charge cap ranks among the lowest statutory ceilings in the country, and its notice-and-hearing sequence is prescriptive, yet it leaves the architectural-review process itself entirely to the declaration, with no statutory decision deadline and no deemed-approval rule. Mandatory manager licensing and association registration through the Common Interest Community Board, plus the Ombudsman complaint pathway, add a regulatory layer that many states lack. The market is large. Per the Foundation for Community Association Research (CAI) 2024 Virginia Facts and Figures, roughly 2,050,000 Virginians live in 804,400 homes across more than 9,100 community associations, whose residents pay $4.04 billion a year to maintain their communities, and 70,300 Virginians serve as volunteer community-association leaders each year, providing $92.1 million in service.31 That scale, concentrated in Northern Virginia, Richmond, and Hampton Roads, gives the strict-construction case law and the CIC Board's oversight real weight for boards and managers.
This coverage updates quarterly as the General Assembly, the Court of Appeals of Virginia, and the Supreme Court of Virginia act. Federal frameworks — the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act, the FCC OTARD rule, and the Fair Housing Act — apply to Virginia associations on top of state law.13,16,26
- Va. Code §§ 55.1-1800 et seq. (Property Owners' Association Act) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code §§ 55.1-1900 et seq. (Virginia Condominium Act) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code §§ 55.1-2000 et seq. (Horizontal Property Act) ↩ ↩
- Va. Code §§ 55.1-2100 et seq. (Virginia Real Estate Cooperative Act) ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1819 (adoption and enforcement of rules; notice and hearing; $50-per-offense / $10-per-day / 90-day charge caps) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1959 (Virginia Condominium Act parallel; adoption and enforcement of rules and charges for violations) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- 18VAC48-70 (Common Interest Community Ombudsman Regulations; complaint procedure and Notice of Final Adverse Decision) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- Sainani v. Belmont Glen Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., 297 Va. 714, 831 S.E.2d 662 (2019) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1820.1 (solar energy collection devices; no prohibition unless established by the recorded declaration) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1951.1 (Virginia Condominium Act; solar energy collection devices) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1820 (display of the flag of the United States) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1951 (Virginia Condominium Act; display of the flag of the United States) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-243, 120 Stat. 572 ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1822 (for-sale signs; association may not require use of an association sign) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 15.2-109 (restriction on localities regulating certain signs; does not reach private associations) ↩ ↩
- 47 C.F.R. § 1.4000 (Over-the-Air Reception Devices rule) ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1823.1 (electric vehicle charging stations; installation on an owner's property) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1962.1 (Virginia Condominium Act; electric vehicle charging stations) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1821 (home-based businesses; subject to reasonable restrictions and local ordinances) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1835 (annual report by association; fee credited to the Common Interest Community Management Information Fund) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 54.1-2346 (license required to provide management services to a common interest community) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 54.1-2349 (Common Interest Community Board; certificate of registration to associations) ↩ ↩
- Court of Appeals of Virginia, expanded appellate jurisdiction effective January 1, 2022 (2021 Special Session I, SB 1261) ↩
- Va. Code § 54.1-2354.4 (association complaint procedure; Common Interest Community Ombudsman) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Code § 55.1-1819.1 (limitation of smoking in development; not a political-sign provision) ↩
- 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(A) (Fair Housing Act reasonable-modification right) ↩ ↩ ↩
- Va. Acts of Assembly ch. 685 (SB 672, 2024 Regular Session), amending Va. Code §§ 55.1-1805, 55.1-1904 (assessments for legal obligations of associations) ↩
- HB 2750 (2025 Regular Session), amending Va. Code § 55.1-1837 (POAA) and § 55.1-1940.1 (Condominium Act) (termination of management contracts) ↩
- HB 1704 / SB 808 (2025 Regular Session), amending Va. Code § 55.1-2310 (resale certificate; insurance-deductible disclosure) ↩
- Burkholder v. Palisades Park Owners Ass'n, Inc., 76 Va. App. 577, 882 S.E.2d 906 (2023) ↩
- Foundation for Community Association Research (CAI), 2024 Virginia Facts and Figures ↩