We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Colorado bill to void mandatory golf-club covenants — and open club books — died 8-5

Colorado · Legislation

Colorado bill to void mandatory golf-club covenants — and open club books — died 8-5

A Colorado bill that would have voided future covenants requiring homeowners to join a private club, and suspended dues at any club that refused to open its books, was postponed indefinitely on March 24, 2026 after the committee worked through six amendments. HB26-1316 was killed 8–5 in the House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government, having failed a referral vote 5–8 minutes earlier. Its status is Lost.1

One thing to get right before anything else: this was not an HOA bill. It exempted unit owners' associations and metropolitan districts by name, and it sat in Title 38, Article 30 — general conveyancing — rather than in CCIOA. The target was the privately owned country club whose dues ride along with the deed.

The ban, and who was carved out

The bill would have added C.R.S. 38-30-170.5. Its operative sentence was prospective only: “a covenant or declaration for a residential property that is recorded on or after January 1, 2027, and that requires the owner of the residential property to join a private membership club is void and unenforceable.” Existing mandatory-membership covenants would have been untouched by the ban.2

A “private membership club” was an entity that “admits members and requires members to pay monetary dues, assessments, or fees in exchange for access to club facilities, programs, or services” and “is privately owned or operated” — expressly including a country club, a sports and recreation club, a golf club, a tennis club and an equestrian club.

And expressly excluding:

“(A) a unit owners' association organized pursuant to section 38-33.3-301; (B) a metropolitan district, as defined by section 32-1-103 (10); or (C) a recreational club, amenity, or facility that is owned or operated by a metropolitan district, a unit owners' association, or other common interest community, as defined by section 38-33.3-103 (8).”

HOA dues were never in scope. Neither were metro-district-owned pools and clubhouses.

Keep reading with the Colorado State Pass

The rest of this analysis — what an association can actually do, the recent bills and rulings, and how Colorado compares nationally — is for subscribers. $49/month for every Colorado topic on HOA Weekly.

$49/month, $449/year, or a $19.99 day pass.

What you unlock

  • The part that reached existing covenants
  • The remedy that made it contentious
  • Why the vote pattern matters

and 2 more sections in detail

Unlock Colorado

Already a subscriber? Sign in

Recurring monthly subscription · Cancel anytime · Need help?

Related Colorado HOA Topics

← All Colorado HOA Topics

  1. HB26-1316, "Private Membership Club Covenants" — bill page, status, amendment and postponement votes, Colorado General Assembly ↩
  2. HB26-1316 introduced bill text, proposed C.R.S. 38-30-170.5 (source of the quoted language and the CCIOA and metro-district exclusions) ↩

Stay on top of Colorado HOA law

Every week: new Colorado legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.