S. 903 would have ended the notarization exemption for HOA documents. It got 15 days in a House committee
S. 903 would have ended the notarization exemption for HOA documents. It got 15 days in a House committee
2026-09-19 · South Carolina · Legislation · Did not pass
S. 903 passed the South Carolina Senate 39-0 and then expired, unheard, in a House committee. It would have rewritten the recording rule that already decides whether an association's governing documents can be enforced at all — and it would have reversed a nine-year-old exemption in the process.1
What Section 27-30-130 says now
Three things, and they are unchanged:
- (A)(1) — "in order to be enforceable, a homeowners association's governing documents must be recorded" in the clerk of court's, Register of Mesne Conveyance or register of deeds office in the county where the property is located.
- (B)(2) — rules, regulations and amendments to them must be recorded "by January tenth of each year following their adoption or amendment" to remain enforceable.
- (D) — "The recording of the rules, regulations, bylaws, and amendments to rules and regulations are not subject to the requirements of witnesses and acknowledgements required under Section 30-5-30."2
Subsection (D) is the exemption. Since 2018, an association has been able to record its rules without the witnessing and acknowledgment that the general recording statute demands of an ordinary instrument.
What the bill would have changed
Sponsored by Sens. Young, Grooms, Johnson, Zell, Stubbs and Kimbrell, S. 903 as reported by Senate Judiciary on April 9, 2026 did three things at once.
It widened the definition in Section 27-30-120(4), so that "governing documents" expressly took in rules and regulations alongside the declaration, master deeds and bylaws. It then swapped that widened term into the January 10 deadline — so the annual recording obligation would have reached every governing document, not just the rules. And it struck subsection (D) and replaced it.
The reversal in subsection (D)
The replacement subsection reads, in the committee's text: "On and after January 1, 2027, recording of the governing documents is subject to the requirements of witnesses and acknowledgements required under Section 30-5-30."
The word the amendment struck is "not." The exemption that has stood since 2018 Act No. 245 would have become an obligation.
Two softening provisions came with it. A new (D)(2) would have allowed each governing document to be recorded as an exhibit to an instrument that does satisfy Section 30-5-30 and that identifies and incorporates the document by reference — in which case no separate witnessing or acknowledgment is needed. And a new (D)(3) would have grandfathered everything already on file: documents recorded before January 1, 2027 "are valid, effective, and enforceable if not separately witnessed or acknowledged."
So the design was prospective. Nothing already recorded would have been put at risk; the formality would have attached to what associations recorded from 2027 onward.
Why the recording gate carries more weight in South Carolina than elsewhere
In most states the enforceability of a covenant turns on its terms, its reasonableness, and ordinary recording law. South Carolina wrote an express condition into the HOA Act itself: an unrecorded governing document is not enforceable. That makes a filing failure a complete answer to an enforcement action, and it is why Section 27-30-130 surfaces so often when an owner contests a fine or an architectural decision.
It is also why the January 10 date matters. Read literally, subsection (B)(2) attaches an annual deadline to the continued enforceability of rules and regulations — a requirement with no analogue in most states, and one that operates without anyone checking. No agency audits compliance. The gate is tested only when an owner raises it in a dispute, which means a rule recorded late, or never, can be enforced unchallenged for years.
What is unchanged because the bill died
- The January 10 recording deadline still applies to rules, regulations and amendments — not to declarations, master deeds or bylaws, which fall under the general enforceability requirement in (A) instead.
- Recording of rules, regulations, bylaws and amendments remains exempt from the witness and acknowledgment requirements of Section 30-5-30. There is no January 1, 2027 change coming.
- The definition of "governing documents" in Section 27-30-120(4) remains "declaration, master deeds, or bylaws, or any amendments" — without the express reference to rules and regulations the bill would have added.
- There is still no state registry of associations or of their documents. The county register of deeds is the only repository, indexed by property rather than by association name.
One 2026 act did reach the recording offices without touching the rule: Act No. 218, signed May 19, 2026, added Abbeville County to the list of counties whose register of deeds is an appointed office rather than a duty of the clerk of court.
The timeline, and what it shows
Introduced February 10, 2026 and referred to Senate Judiciary. Favorable with amendment April 9. Amendment adopted and second reading April 16, by a roll call of 39-0. Third reading April 28. To the House April 29, referred to Labor, Commerce and Industry. Session ended May 14.
Fifteen days, no hearing. S. 903 was the only association bill of the 2026 session to clear a chamber, and it did so without a dissenting vote — which locates the disagreement somewhere other than the Senate floor. Because South Carolina's two-year term ended with it, a 2027 version would begin again at first reading.
Related South Carolina HOA Topics
Stay on top of South Carolina HOA law
Every week: new South Carolina legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.