We explain HOA law in plain English, but we are not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Here is why that matters.

Virginia put two community management companies into receivership

Virginia · Regulation

Virginia put two community management companies into receivership

Two Virginia community association management companies were placed into court-appointed receivership after state investigations, and one of them surrendered its licence. The Office of the Common Interest Community Ombudsman records the outcome in its annual report to the General Assembly.1

Receivership is the heaviest instrument Virginia has for a management company. It is not a fine and it is not a suspension — it is a court taking control of the business.

What the report says

The Office referred three cases for investigation in the reporting year. The result: “DPOR's Investigations Section conducted detailed investigations that resulted in two property management companies — Rosewood Management and Tagare Corporation — being placed in receiverships with local circuit courts”, working with the Office of the Attorney General.

Tagare Corporation admitted violations of the Common Interest Community Board's regulations and agreed to revocation of its licence.

The statutory machinery

Receivership of a common interest community manager is provided for in Title 54.1, Chapter 23.3 — the same chapter that creates the Board and the Ombudsman. The statute contemplates a court-supervised process in which a receiver takes control, and it anticipates the financial fallout: where the Common Interest Community Management Recovery Fund pays a claim, “The Fund shall have a claim against the subject common interest community manager for the amount paid.”2

The chapter goes further than most states would. Where the Board finds a manager insolvent, that merger into another manager is desirable “for the protection of the associations to which such common interest community manager provides management services”, and that an emergency exists, the Board's approval of a merger plan can substitute for shareholder approval.

✓ Your Virginia State Pass is active — the full analysis below is unlocked

Why a receivership rather than a revocation

Revoking a licence stops a company from managing associations. It does nothing about the money and records the company is already holding.

A Virginia management company typically holds operating and reserve accounts for every association on its books, together with the ledgers, contracts, minute books and vendor records those associations need to keep functioning. Pull the licence and those assets sit inside a company with no lawful business and no incentive to be helpful. A receiver is appointed precisely to take custody of them.

That the Attorney General's office was involved alongside DPOR reflects the same reality. Receivership requires a circuit court petition, and the state needs counsel to bring one.

The legislative response, enacted the same year

Chapter 105 of the 2025 Acts of Assembly amended §§ 55.1-1837 and 55.1-1940.1 to provide that “A management contract that contains an automatic renewal provision may be terminated by the association or the common interest community manager at any time without cause and without penalty upon not less than 60 days' written notice.”

The same chapter amended the licensing provisions in Title 54.1 to require an outgoing manager to transfer and release funds and close accounts within a reasonable time and without additional cost.

Read against the receivership record, the logic of that reform is visible. The state's remedy is slow and requires a court. The sixty-day exit is fast and requires only a board vote and a letter.

What the Board does in the ordinary case

Most enforcement is not receivership. At its June 5, 2025 meeting the Common Interest Community Board considered a disciplinary file against a management firm, rejected the milder recommendation that came out of its informal fact-finding process, and instead imposed “a monetary penalty of $2,500.00 and revocation” of the licence. A second file against a different firm was closed with no violation found.3

Historical files show the range: penalties in the hundreds, probation with automatic revocation on breach, and consent orders conditioning waiver of a penalty on completing named courses within 30 days.

The conditions that change the answer

Licensing reaches managers, not boards. The Board licenses common interest community managers and certifies their principal and supervisory employees. A self-managed association is outside that regime entirely — and 89 of the 310 complaints in the reporting year concerned self-managed communities.

The exemptions in § 54.1-2347 are wide. An employee of an association managing that association's community, an uncompensated resident, and a board member acting without compensation are all outside the licensing requirement.

Exact receivership dates were not stated in the material reviewed. The report records the outcomes within its reporting period; the underlying circuit court orders were not examined for this piece.

What to watch next

The Board's proposed rewrite of its manager regulations, 18VAC48-50, would add a fidelity bond requirement, contract-content requirements and a bar on undisclosed vendor remuneration. Those are the controls that address what a receivership discovers after the fact.

Related Virginia HOA Topics

← All Virginia HOA Topics

  1. Office of the Common Interest Community Ombudsman, Annual Report (RD938, 2025) — Virginia Reports to the General Assembly ↩
  2. Va. Code Title 54.1, Chapter 23.3, Common Interest Communities — full chapter text (receivership and Recovery Fund provisions) ↩
  3. Common Interest Community Board, meeting minutes, June 5, 2025 — Virginia Regulatory Town Hall ↩

Stay on top of Virginia HOA law

Every week: new Virginia legislation, court rulings, and regulatory developments affecting condos, planned communities, and property managers. Free.

Check your inbox to complete your sign up.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.